SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Medical Journal / 2015 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 4

Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors and Quality of Life in Physicians: A Faculty of Medicine Based Cross-Sectional Study

Hekimlerde Sağlıklı Yaşam Biçimi Davranışları ve Yaşam Kalitesi: Tıp Fakültesi Tabanlı Kesitsel Bir Çalışma

Birgül PİYAL
Mustafa ÇAKIR
Sefer AYCAN
Pages
209–219
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: There were significant positive relation among healty lifestyle behaviors with quality of life and perceived economic status and negative relation between weekly working hours and healty lifestyle behaviors (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the healthy lifestyle behaviors and the quality of life of research assistants who work in a university hospital located in Ankara.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted with the participation of 144 Internal and Surgical Medicine Sciences'assistants who work in an university hospital.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: There were significant positive relation among healty lifestyle behaviors with quality of life and perceived economic status and negative relation between weekly working hours and healty lifestyle behaviors (p
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the healthy lifestyle behaviors and the quality of life of research assistants who work in a university hospital located in Ankara. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted with the participation of 144 Internal and Surgical Medicine Sciences'assistants who work in an university hospital. Data was collected by a questionnaire which includes sociodemographic characteristics, healthy lifestyle scale and quality of life scale between 5-14 May 2014. SPSS 15.0 software programme was used for analyses. Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal Wallis tests were used for comparisons and Spearman and Kendall Tau correlation test was used for correlations. Results: There were significant positive relation among healty lifestyle behaviors with quality of life and perceived economic status and negative relation between weekly working hours and healty lifestyle behaviors (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada Ankara'da bir tıp fakültesinde çalışan araştırma görevlilerinin sağlıklı yaşam biçimi davranışları ve yaşam kalitelerinin değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Materyal ve Metot: Araştırma Ankara'da bir üniversite hastanesinde dahili ve cerrahi tıp bilimleri araştırma görevlilerinden 144 kişinin katılımıyla gerçekleştirilmiş kesitsel tipte bir çalışmadır. Veriler, sosyodemografik özellikler, sağlıklı yaşam biçimi davranışları ölçeği ve yaşam kalitesi ölçeğinden oluşan anket formlarının doldurulmasıyla 5-14 Mayıs 2014 tarihleri arasında toplanmıştır. SPSS 15.0 ile değerlendirilmiştir. İstatiksel değerlendirmede Mann-Whitney U ve Kruskal Wallis testi, Spearman korelasyon, Kendall Tau korelasyon testi kullanılmıştır. Bulgular: Sağlıklı yaşam biçimi davranışları ile yaşam kalitesi ve algılanan ekonomik durum arasında pozitif yönde ilişki, haftalık çalışma süresi arasında ise negatif yönde ilişki saptanmıştır (p

🔖

Cite This Article

PİYAL, B., ÇAKIR, M., AYCAN, S. (2022). Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors and Quality of Life in Physicians: A Faculty of Medicine Based Cross-Sectional Study. Ankara Medical Journal, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 4, 209–219. https://ajindex.com/articles/442158

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Tones K. Health Promotion, Health Education, and Public Health. In: Oxford Textbook of Public Health, Detels R, McEwen J, Beaglehole R and Tanaka H (eds), 4th ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002. Gochman DS (editor). Health Behaviour: Plural Perspectives, In: Health Behaviour, Emerging Research Perspective. New York: Plenum Publishing Corporation; New York 1988:3-4.
  2. Upton D, Thirlaway K. Promoting Healthy Behaviour: A Practical Guide. 2nd ed., New York: Roudledge; 2014:76. Kung HC, Hoyert DL, Xu JQ, Murphy SL. Deaths: Final data for 2005. National Vital Statistics Reports 2008;56(10). Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD, et al. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012;380:2224-60.
  3. Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012;380:2095-2128.
  4. Ford ES, Zhao G, Tsai J, Li C. Low-risk lifestyle behaviors and all-cause mortality: Findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III Mortality Study. American Journal of Public Health, published online ahead of print August 18, 2011. Fallowfield L. What is Quality of life. Health Economics, Second Edition, 2009. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) & Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Measuring healthy days: Population assessment of health-related quality of life. Atlanta: CDC; 2000.
  5. Walker SN, Hill-Polerecky DM. Psychometric evaluation of the Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile II. Unpublished manuscript, University of Nebraska Medical Center;1996.
  6. Bahar Z, Beşer A, Gördes N, Ersin F, Kıssal A. Sağlıklı Yasam Biçimi Davranışları Ölçeği II'nin Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması, C.Ü. Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi 2008;12(1):1-13.
  7. Eser E, Lağarlı T, Baydur H, et al. EUROHIS (WHOQOL-8.Tr) Türkçe sürümünün Türk toplumundaki psikometrik özellikleri. Turk J Public Health 2010;8(3): 136-152. İş Kanunu. Kanun NO: 4857. Resmi Gazete:10.03.2003/sayı:25134. Pasinlioğlu T, Gözüm S. Birinci Basamak Sağlık Hizmetlerinde Çalışan Sağlık Personelinin Sağlık Davranışları. C. Ü. Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi 1998;2 (2):60-68.
  8. Yalçınkaya M, Özer FG, Karamanoğlu AY. Sağlık Çalışanlarında Sağlıklı Yaşam Biçimi Davranışlarının Değerlendirilmesi. TAF Prev Me