SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Medical Journal / 2019 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1

Old and New Criteria for the Diagnosis of Fibromyalgia:Comparison and Evaluation

Fibromiyalji Tanısı İçin Eski ve Yeni Kriterler:Değerlendirme ve Karşılaştırma

Ayla ÇAĞLIYAN TÜRK
Pages
83–95
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

While ACR 1990, ACR 2010 and ACR 2010‐mode criteria did not differ, the ACR 2013 alternative criteria were significantly different from those of the others by WPI and SES score (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: To evaluate the differences between the diagnostic criteria of old and new Fibromyalgia Syndrome (FMS) and to determine the relationship between the diagnostic criteria and the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ).Materials and Methods: A total of 132 women with generalized pain were included in the study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:ACR 1990 to the patients, the number of tender points, ACR 2010; widespread pain index (WPI) ‐ symptom severity scale (SSS), ACR 2010 modified criteria; (WPI‐modified score) and alternative diagnostic criteria for 2013 ACR; pain location score (PLS) was applied with Symptom Impact Questionnaire (SIQR).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:While ACR 1990, ACR 2010 and ACR 2010‐mode criteria did not differ, the ACR 2013 alternative criteria were significantly different from those of the others by WPI and SES score (p
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the differences between the diagnostic criteria of old and new Fibromyalgia Syndrome (FMS) and to determine the relationship between the diagnostic criteria and the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ).Materials and Methods: A total of 132 women with generalized pain were included in the study. ACR 1990 to the patients, the number of tender points, ACR 2010; widespread pain index (WPI) ‐ symptom severity scale (SSS), ACR 2010 modified criteria; (WPI‐modified score) and alternative diagnostic criteria for 2013 ACR; pain location score (PLS) was applied with Symptom Impact Questionnaire (SIQR). Functional status evaluation was performed with FIQ.Results: The mean age of the patients was 47.68 ± 8.31 years. The mean BMI was 29.34 ± 4.92. While 34.8% of the patients were diagnosed as FMS according to ACR 1990 criteria, 37.9% according to ACR 2010 criteria, 42.4% according to ACR 2010‐mode criteria and 18.2% according to ACR alternative criteria were diagnosed as FMS. While ACR 1990, ACR 2010 and ACR 2010‐mode criteria did not differ, the ACR 2013 alternative criteria were significantly different from those of the others by WPI and SES score (p

Özet

Amaç: Eski ve yeni Fibromiyalji Sendromu (FMS) tanı kriterleri arasındaki farklılıkları değerlendirmekve tanı kriterleri ile Fibromiyalji Etki Anketi (FEA) arasındaki ilişkiyi saptamaktır.Materyal ve Metot: Yaygın ağrı şikayeti olan 132 kadın hasta çalışmaya dahil edildi. Hastalara ACR1990; hassas nokta sayısı, ACR 2010; yaygın ağrı indeksi (YAİ)‐semptom şiddet skalası (SSS), ACR 2010modifiye kriterler; (YAİ‐modifiye skor) ve 2013 ACR alternatif tanı kriterleri; ağrı yerleşim skoru (AYS)‐semptom etki skoru (SES) ile uygulandı. Fonksiyonel durum değerlendirilmesi FEA ile yapıldı. Bulgular: Hastaların ortalama yaşı 47,68±8,31 yıl idi. Ortalama BMI 29,34±4,92 idi. ACR 1990 kriterleregöre hastaların %34,80’i FMS tanısı alırken, ACR 2010 kriterlerine göre %37,90 hasta, ACR 2010‐modkriterlerine göre %42,40 hasta, 2013 ACR alternatif kriterlerine göre %18,20 hasta FMS tanısı almıştı.ACR 1990, ACR 2010 ve ACR 2010‐mod kriterleri arasında farklılık gözlenmezken, ACR 2013 alternatifkriterleri AYS ve SES skoru ile diğerlerinden anlamlı olarak farklıydı (p

🔖

Cite This Article

TÜRK, A. Ç. (2022). Old and New Criteria for the Diagnosis of Fibromyalgia:Comparison and Evaluation. Ankara Medical Journal, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1, 83–95. https://ajindex.com/articles/441931

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Moyano S, Kilstein JG, Alegre de Miguel C. New diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia: Here to stay? Reumatol Clin. 2015
  2. 11(4):210‐4 2. Nazlıkul H. Fibromyalgia syndrome. Journal of Complementary Medicine, Regulation and Neural Therapy 2014
  3. 8(2):1‐9 3. Koca TT. Cognitive Dysfunction in Fibromyalgia. Archives Medical Review Journal 2015
  4. 24(1):105‐18 4. Bellato E, Marini E, Castoldi F, et al. Fibromyalgia syndrome: etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. Pain Res Treat 2012
  5. 426130 5. Wolfe F. Fibromyalgia wars. J Rheumatol 2009
  6. 36(4):671‐8 6. Bass C, Henderson M. Fibromyalgia: an unhelpful diagnosis for patients and doctors. BMJ 2014
  7. g2168 7. Wolfe F, Smythe HA, Yunus MB, et al. The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of fibromyalgia. Report of the Multicenter Criteria Committee. Arthritis Rheum 1990
  8. 33(2):160–72. 8. Çakır T. Fibromiyalji Sendromunda Tanı Kriterleri: Türkiye Klinikleri J PM&R‐Special Topics 2015
  9. 8(3): 22‐7 9. Özkan N. Complementary approach in fibromyalgia syndrome. Journal of Complementary Medicine, Regulation and Neural Therapy 2017
  10. 11(1): 12‐9 10. Wolfe F, Clauw DJ, Fitzcharles MA, et al. The American College of Rheumatology preliminary diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia and measurement of symptom severity. Arthr Care Res (Hoboken) 2010
  11. 600‐10. 11. Wolfe F, Clauw DJ, Fitzcharles MA, et al. Fibromyalgia criteria and severity scales for clinical and epidemiological studies: a modification of the ACR Preliminary Diagnostic Criteria for Fibromyalgia. J Rheumatol 2011
  12. 38(6):1113‐22 12. Bennett R, Friend R, Marcus D, et al. Criteria for the Diagnosis of Fibromyalgia: Validation of the Modified 2010 Preliminary ACR Criteria and the Development of Alternative Criteria. Arthritis Care & Research 2014 Feb
  13. 1002 13. Burckhardt CS, Clark Sr, Bennet RM. The fibromiyalgia impact questionnaire: development and validation. J Rheumatol.1991
  14. 18(5):728‐33. 14. Sarmer S, Ergin S, Yavuzer G. The validity and realibility of the Turkish version of the Fibromyalgia impact questionnaire Rheumatol Int. 2000
  15. 9‐12. 15. Fitzcharles MA, Boulos P. Inaccuracy in the diagnosis of fibromyalgia syndrome: analysis of referrals. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2003
  16. 42(2):263‐7. 16. Mease P, Arnold LM, Choy EH, et al. Fibromyalgia syndrome module at OMERACT 9: domain construct. J Rheumatol. 2009
  17. 36(10):2318‐29. 17. Mease P. Fibromyalgia syndrome: review of clinical presentation, pathogenesis, outcome measures, and tre