Journals / Ankara Medical Journal / 2021 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 4

EVALUATION OF ANXIETY IN INDIVIDUALS WITH ENDSTAGE LUNG DISEASE DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC

COVID-19 PANDEMİSİ SÜRECİNDE SON DÖNEM AKCİĞER HASTALIĞI OLAN BİREYLERDE KAYGININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Pages
594–604
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the STAI-2 evaluation, the anxiety level was statistically significantly higher in women (median; min-max: 50; 38-67) compared to men (42; 26-75) (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: With this study, it was aimed to determine the anxiety levels of individuals with end-stage lung disease during the COVID-19 outbreak.
📊
Key Findings & Data:State and trait anxiety levels of the participants were determined according to the STAI-1 and STAI-2 scores.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the STAI-2 evaluation, the anxiety level was statistically significantly higher in women (median; min-max: 50; 38-67) compared to men (42; 26-75) (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: With this study, it was aimed to determine the anxiety levels of individuals with end-stage lung disease during the COVID-19 outbreak. Materials and Methods: Adults with respiratory failure due to underlying lung disease and using long-term oxygen therapy were included in the study. State and trait anxiety levels of the participants were determined according to the STAI-1 and STAI-2 scores. Results: According to the STAI-1 evaluation, 64 (28,57) of the cases had mild, 142 (63,39) moderate, and 18 (8,03) severe anxiety, and according to the STAI-2 evaluation, 44 (19,64) had mild, 164 (73,21) moderate, and 16 (7.14) had severe anxiety. According to the STAI-2 evaluation, the anxiety level was statistically significantly higher in women (median; min-max: 50; 38-67) compared to men (42; 26-75) (p

Özet

Amaç: COVID-19 salgını sırasında son dönem akciğer hastalığı olan bireylerin kaygı düzeylerinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Materyal ve Metot: Çalışmaya altta yatan akciğer hastalığı nedeni ile solunum yetmezliği olan ve uzun süreli oksijen tedavisi kullanan erişkinler dahil edildi. Katılımcılarda durumluk ve sürekli kaygı düzeyleri sırası ile STAI-1 ve STAI-2 skorlarına göre belirlendi Bulgular: STAI-1 değerlendirmesine göre olguların 64’ünde (28,57%) hafif, 142’sinde (63,39%) orta, 18’inde (8,03%) ağır düzeyde anksiyete, STAI-2 değerlendirmesine göre 44’ünde (19,64%) hafif, 164’sinde (73,21%) orta, 16’inde (7,14%) ağır düzeyde anksiyete mevcuttu. STAI-2 değerlendirmesine göre kadınlarda (medyan; min-max: 50; 38-67) erkeklere (42; 26-75) göre kaygı düzeyi daha yüksekti (p

🔖

Cite This Article

AKSU, K., BEYOĞLU, M. A., YILDIZ, M., ŞAHİN, M. F. (2022). EVALUATION OF ANXIETY IN INDIVIDUALS WITH ENDSTAGE LUNG DISEASE DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC. Ankara Medical Journal, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 4, 594–604. https://ajindex.com/articles/441758

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Pascarella G, Strumia A, Piliego C, et al. COVID-19 diagnosis and management: a comprehensive review. J Intern Med. 2020;288(2):192-206
  2. Du RH, Liang LR, Yang CQ, et al. Predictors of mortality for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia caused by SARS-CoV-2: a prospective cohort study. Eur Respir J. 2020;55(5):2000524
  3. Aksu K, Naziroğlu T, Özkan P. Factors determining COVID-19 pneumonia severity in a country with routine BCG vaccination. Clin Exp Immunol. 2020;202(2):220-5
  4. Cummings MJ, Baldwin MR, Abrams D, et al. Epidemiology, clinical course, and outcomes of critically ill adults with COVID-19 in New York City: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395(10239):1763-70
  5. Bavel JJV, Baicker K, Boggio PS, et al. Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nat Hum Behav. 2020;4(5):460-71
  6. Vindegaard N, Benros ME. COVID-19 pandemic and mental health consequences: Systematic review of the current evidence. Brain Behav Immun. 2020;89:531-42
  7. Shigemura J, Ursano RJ, Morganstein JC, Kurosawa M, Benedek DM. Public responses to the novel 2019 coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in Japan: Mental health consequences and target populations. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2020;74(4):281-2
  8. Brooks SK, Webster RK, Smith LE, et al. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. Lancet. 2020;395(10227):912-20
  9. Tahmassian K, Jalali Moghadam N. Relationship between self-efficacy and symptoms of anxiety, depression, worry and social avoidance in a normal sample of students. Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci. 2011;5(2):91-8
  10. Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene R, Vagg PR, Jacobs L. vol
  11. Calif Consulting Psychologists Press; 1970. pp. 1–24. (Manual for the State-Trait. Anxiety Inventory Palo Alto)
  12. Öner N, Le Compte A. (1998). Süreksiz Durumluk/Sürekli Kaygı Evanteri El Kitabı.(2.Basım). İstanbul: Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınevi
  13. Global Strategy for Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of COPD 2021 report [İnternet] https://goldcopd.org/2021-gold-reports/ (Erişim tarihi 27.04.2021)
  14. Sharma BB, Singh S, Sharma VK, et al. Psychiatric morbidity in chronic respiratory disorders in an Indian service using GMHAT/PC. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2013;35(1):39-44
  15. Yiğit R, Dilmaç B, Deniz ME, Hamarta E. Sürücülerin Sürekli ve Durumluk Kaygılarının Bazı Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi. Uluslararası Avrasya Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2011; 2(4):37-44
  16. Savas E, Tanriverdi D. Knowledge, attitude