SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 4

CONCORDAT AND RESTRUCTURING IN TURKISH INSOLVENCY LAW (A REVIEW FROM ADR PERSPECTIVE)

Mustafa GÖKSU
Pages
119–153
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this article, concordat and restructuring in Turkish law and the aforementioned similarity and a possible relation between these institutions and ADR are examined.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:All modern legal systems present alternatives to the ultimate and undesirable conclusion of bankruptcy liquidation for insolvent debtors.
📊
Key Findings & Data:These alternatives provide reorganization and restructuring of unpaid debts, the debtor or even both.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this article, concordat and restructuring in Turkish law and the aforementioned similarity and a possible relation between these institutions and ADR are examined.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Bankruptcy · reorganization · insolvency

Abstract

All modern legal systems present alternatives to the ultimate and undesirable conclusion of bankruptcy liquidation for insolvent debtors. These alternatives provide reorganization and restructuring of unpaid debts, the debtor or even both. Even though there is a wide range of reorganization schemes throughout different legal systems, the essence of these mechanisms are surprisingly similar. They provide temporary protection for debtors who are in financial trouble with the hopes of a possible rescue, while incorporating the creditors in the process. The key point of all these schemes is almost always the concession to be made by both sides. This aspect of reorganization mechanisms is unmistakably reminiscent of amicable resolution of conflicts and alternative dispute resolution, even though the origins of the reorganization mechanisms mostly lack this perspective. In this article, concordat and restructuring in Turkish law and the aforementioned similarity and a possible relation between these institutions and ADR are examined.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖKSU, M. (2022). CONCORDAT AND RESTRUCTURING IN TURKISH INSOLVENCY LAW (A REVIEW FROM ADR PERSPECTIVE). Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 4, 119–153. https://ajindex.com/articles/441541

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (30)

  1. ANSAY, S. Ş.: Hukuk İcra ve İflas Usulleri, 5th Edition,
  2. İstiklal, Ankara, 1960.
  3. ARSLAN, R. / YILMAZ, E. / TAŞPINAR- AYVAZ, S. / HANAĞASI, E.: İcra ve İflas Hukuku, 5th Edition,
  4. Yetkin, Ankara, 2019.
  5. ATALAY, O.: “Konkordato Reformu Hakkında Değerlendirmeler”, 7101 Sayılı Kanunla Konkordato ve Elektronik Tebligat Konularında Getirilen Yenilikler, Oniki Levha, İstanbul, 2018, pp. 111-135.
  6. ATALI, M. / ERMENEK, İ. / ERDOĞAN, E.: İcra ve İflas Hukuku, 2nd Edition,
  7. Yetkin, Ankara, 2019.
  8. AYER, J. D. / BERNSTEIN, M. / FRIEDLAND, J.: “Chapter 11- An Overview of the Automatic Stay”, ABI Journal, Vol. XXII, No. 10, December/January 2004.
  9. AYHAN, R. / ÇAĞLAR, H. / ÖZDAMAR, M.: Şirketler Hukuku Genel Esaslar, Yetkin, Ankara, 2019.
  10. BERKİN, N. M.: İflas Hukuku Dersleri, Hamle, İstanbul, 1960.
  11. BÖRÜ, L.: “Adi Konkordatoda Alacaklılar Kurulu”, İnönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 9 (2), pp. 341-372.
  12. CONWAY, L.: Company Voluntary Arrangements, House of Commons Library Briefing Paper, No. 6944, 11 June 2019.
  13. EISENBERG, T.: Bankruptcy and Debtor-Creditor Law, Fourth Edition,
  14. Foundation, New York, 2011.
  15. EKMEKÇİ, Ö. / ÖZEKES, M. / ATALI, M. / SEVEN, V.: Hukuk Uyuşmazlıklarında Arabuluculuk, 2nd Edition,
  16. Oniki Levha, İstanbul, 2019.
  17. EREN, F.: Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler, Volume I, 5th Edition,
  18. Beta, İstanbul, 1994.
  19. ERMENEK, İ. / AZAKLI ARSLAN, B.: “İcra ve İflâs Hukuku Açisindan Ticarî Davalarda Arabulucuya Başvuru Zorunluluğu (TTK m. 5/A)”, TBB Journal 2020 (148), pp. 135-196.
  20. ERMENEK, İ.: İflasın Ertelenmesi, 2nd Edition,
  21. Adalet, Ankara, 2010.
  22. GÖKSU, M.: Alternatif Uyuşmazlık Yolları ve Tahkim, 2nd Edition,
  23. Seçkin, Ankara, 2020. (ADR) GÖKSU, M.: “Recovery of Monetary Credits by Way of Procedures for Compulsory Enforcement Without a Judgment According to Turkish Code of Compulsory Enforcement and Bankruptcy”, Ankara Bar Review, Year 7, No 1, pp. 81-112. (Recovery) GÜRDOĞAN, B.: İflas Hukuku Dersleri, Ajans-Türk, Ankara, 1966.
  24. ILDIR, G.: Alternatif Uyuşmazlık Çözümü, Seçkin, Ankara, 2003.
  25. JAMES, F. / HAZARD, G. C. / LEUBSDORF, J.: Civil Procedure, 5th Edition,
  26. Foundation, New York, 2001.
  27. KALE, S.: “7101 Sayılı İcra ve İflas Kanununda Değişiklik Yapılmasına Dair Kanun Çerçevesinde İflas Dışı Adi Konkordato”, İstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 5 (1), Spring 2018, pp. 213-269.
  28. KERLEY, P. / BANKER HAMES, J. / SUKYS, P. A.: Civil Litigation, 6th Edition,
  29. Delmar, New York, 2012.
  30. KILINÇ, A.: “Mahkeme Dışında Yapılan Sulh ve Yargılamaya Etkisi”, İstanbul Hukuk