Journals / Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 3

GENEVA ACT OF THE LISBON AGREEMENT ON APPELLATIONS OF ORIGIN AND GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS IN THE LIGHT OF INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

ULUSLARARASI SÖZLEŞMELER IŞIĞINDA MENŞE ADI VECOĞRAFİ İŞARETLERİN KORUNMASINA İLİŞKİN LİZBONSÖZLEŞMESİ’NİN CENEVRE METNİ

Pages
107–160
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

For this reason, I believe that countries follow the wait-and-see approachwill be more willing to become a party to the Geneva Act if the number of membersincreases a little more and the confi dence in the functionality of the system increases.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Geneva Act, which was prepared with great hopes, was analyzed in thispaper.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The fl exibility of the Lisbon System has been increased, many issues regardingregistration have been clarifi ed, and some of the criticisms against the system havebeen eliminated through the Geneva Act.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For this reason, I believe that countries follow the wait-and-see approachwill be more willing to become a party to the Geneva Act if the number of membersincreases a little more and the confi dence in the functionality of the system increases.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The Geneva Act, which was prepared with great hopes, was analyzed in thispaper. The fl exibility of the Lisbon System has been increased, many issues regardingregistration have been clarifi ed, and some of the criticisms against the system havebeen eliminated through the Geneva Act. However, all of these do not seem to satisfythe new world countries which prefer trademark law to protect the geographicalindications. The current number of members is still far from reaching the desired point.Free trade agreements also appear as a new way to protect geographical indicationsoutside the country of origin. Although FTAs seems to provide a quick solution at fi rstglance, this cannot be comparable to the advantages of obtaining protection in allcontracting states by paying a single fee for a single application prepared in a singlelanguage. For this reason, I believe that countries follow the wait-and-see approachwill be more willing to become a party to the Geneva Act if the number of membersincreases a little more and the confi dence in the functionality of the system increases.

Özet

Çalışmada coğrafi işaretlerin korunması ve uluslararası tesciline ilişkin büyükumutlarla hazırlanan Cenevre Metni incelenmiştir. Metinde Lizbon sisteminin esnekliğiartırılmış, tescile ilişkin pek çok konu aydınlatılmış, sisteme yöneltilen eleştirilerin birkısmı bertaraf edilmiştir. Ancak tüm bunlar marka hukuku korumasını tercih edenyeni dünya ülkelerini tatmin etmiş gibi görünmemektedir. Halihazırdaki taraf ülkesayısı hala istenilen noktaya ulaşmaktan uzaktır. Serbest ticaret anlaşmaları coğrafiişaretlerin köken ülkesi dışında korunması konusunda bir alternatif olarak karşımızaçıkmaktadır. Her ne kadar bu yol ilk bakışta hızlı çözüm sağlayan bir yol olarakgözükse de tek bir dilde hazırlanmış, tek bir başvuru ile yine tek bir ücret ödeyerektaraf devletlerin tümünde bir koruma elde edilmesinin sağladığı kolaylık, tasarruf vehız ile karşılaştırılabilir değildir. Bu nedenle taraf ülke sayısının artması ve sisteminişlerliğine güvenin oluşması durumunda, bekle ve gör yaklaşımını izleyen ülkelerinCenevre Metnine taraf olmaya daha sıcak bakacakları düşünülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜNER, Z. Ö. (2022). GENEVA ACT OF THE LISBON AGREEMENT ON APPELLATIONS OF ORIGIN AND GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS IN THE LIGHT OF INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 3, 107–160. https://ajindex.com/articles/441491

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Addor F ve Grazioli A, “Geographical Indications beyond Wines and Spirits”, 2005, 5, The Journal of World Intellectual Property, s.865-897.
  2. Ayhan R. Çağlar, H., Yıldız, B., İmirlioğlu D., Sınaî Mülkiyet Hukuku, Adalet Yayınevi, 2021.
  3. Blakeney M, The Protection of Geographical Indications, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2014.
  4. Bodenhousen G, Guide to the Application of the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, International Bureaux for the Protection of Intellectual Property, 1968. Calboli I, “Expanding the Protections of Geographical Indications of Origin under TRIPS: ‘Old’ Debate or ‘New’ Opportunity?”, 2006, 10, Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review, s.181-204. Calboli I, “Time to Say Local Cheese and Smile at Geographical Indications of Origin - International Trade and Local Development in the United States”, 2015, 53 Houston Law Review, s.373-420. Coşkun AY, “Coğrafi İşaretler” (Türk Patent Enstitüsü Uzmanlık Tezi 2001). Daudpota F ve Ahmed SG, “Trade War for Trans-Border Basmati Label - an Assessment of Select Legal Issues Before the European Commission” (SSRN, 16 Ocak 2021) erişim tarihi 02.06.2021.
  5. Echols MA, Geographical Indications for Food Products, Kluwer Law International, 2008. Engelhardt T, “Geographical Indications Under Recent EU Trade Agreements”, 2015, 46 IIC International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, s.781-818. Evans GR. ve Blakeney M., “The protection of geographical indications after Doha: Quo vadis?”, 2006, 9 Journal of International Economic Law, s.575-614. Ficsor M, “Challenges to the Lisbon System”, Forum on geographical indications and appellations of origin (WIPO/GEO/LIS/08/4) (2008).
  6. Gangjee D, Relocating the Law of Geographical Indications, Cambridge University Press, 2012. Gangjee D, “Making a place for place-based IP: WIPO and geographical indications” in Samuel Ricketson (ed), Research Handbook on the World Intellectual Property Organization, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020 (forthcoming) erişim tarihi 02.06.2021.
  7. Gangjee D, Genericide: The Death of a Geographical Indication? (Jan 30, 2016). in D Gangjee (ed) Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Geographical Indications, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2016, s.4,, erişim tarihi 02.06.2021 Gervais D, “The Lisbon Agreement’s Misunderstood Potential”, 2009, The WIPO Journal, s.87-102. Gervais D,“Reinventing Lisbon: the Case for a Protocol to the Lisbon Agreement (Geographical Indications)”, 2010, 11, Chicago Journal of Internationa