Journals / Ankara Bar Review / 2013 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

New Religious Movements and Freedom of Thought, Conscience and Religion in the European Convention on Human Rights' Jurisprudence

Pages
83–109
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This paper also considers the approach adopted by the British courts which represent a more moderate and measured approach towards NRMs.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper critically examines the attitude of the Council of Europe through the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights in relation to New Religious Movements (NRMs) sometimes referred to as cults .
📊
Key Findings & Data:The Church of Scientology has been used as an example to illustrate the challenges faced by such organizations striving for recognition.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This paper also considers the approach adopted by the British courts which represent a more moderate and measured approach towards NRMs.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This paper critically examines the attitude of the Council of Europe through the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights in relation to New Religious Movements (NRMs) sometimes referred to as cults . On the whole, in contemporary Europe, NMRs seem to have been particularly vulnerable to persecution especially since the collapse of the Soviet Empire and the subsequent integration of many Eastern European states into the Council of Europe. Even though the Strasbourg organs initially limited religious freedoms to the individual, it now accepts that a religious organization also enjoys the right to religious freedom as representative of its members. In spite of this, by and large, NRMs have been denied recognition as bona fide religious institutions in Europe. This is mainly due to the fact that the European Court allows its member states a wide margin of appreciation in such matters. The Church of Scientology has been used as an example to illustrate the challenges faced by such organizations striving for recognition. This paper also considers the approach adopted by the British courts which represent a more moderate and measured approach towards NRMs.

🔖

Cite This Article

ZAND, J. (2022). New Religious Movements and Freedom of Thought, Conscience and Religion in the European Convention on Human Rights' Jurisprudence. Ankara Bar Review, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 83–109. https://ajindex.com/articles/441063

References (9)

  1. Adhar, R. and Leigh, I., ‘Religious Freedom in the Liberal State’, Oxford University Press, 2nd ed., 2013. Ahmed v Inner London Education Authority (1978) QB 36, 41. Al-Nashif v Bulgaria, 20 June 2002 (No. 50963/99). Altıparmak, K. & Karahanoğulları, O., ‘after Şahin: the Debate on Headscarves is not Over’, European Constitutional Law Review 2 (2006) 268. Anagnostou, D. and Psychogiopoulou, E. (eds.), ‘The European Court of Human Rights and the Rights of Marginalized Individuals and Minorities in National Context’, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2009.
  2. Appleby, R.S., ‘the Ambivalence of the Sacred: Religion, Violence, and Reconciliation’, Rowman & Littlefield, 1999.
  3. Arai-Takahashi, Y., “The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine and the Principle of Proportionality in the Jurisprudence of the ECHR”, Cambridge University Press, 1st ed., 2002.
  4. Arrowsmith v. United Kingdom, No. 7050/75, Comm. Rep. 1978, 19 DR 5. Arwick, E., ‘Researching New Religious Movements: Responses and Redefinitions’, Routledge, 2006.
  5. Barker, E., ‘New Religious Movements: A Practical Introduction’, Rose of Sharon Press, 1st ed., 1989.
  6. Barker, E., “New Religions Movements’ in Smelser, N.J. & Baltes, P.B. (eds.), International Encyclopaedia of the Social and Behavioural Science’, 16: 10631-34, Oxford: Elsevier. Beckford, J, A., New religious Movements and Rapid Social Change, sage Publications, 1st ed., 1988.
  7. Boyle, K, Sheen, J., Freedom of Religion or Belief: A World Report, Routledge, 1997. 316-17. Chappell v. UK Application No. 12587/86 (1987) 53 DR 241. Chryssides, G. & Wilkins, M.Z. (eds.), ‘Reader in New Religious Movements: Readings in the Study of New Religious Movements’, Continuum International Publishing, 2006.
  8. Chryssides, G.D., ‘Historical Dictionary of New Religious Movements’, 2nd edition, Scarecrow Press, 2012. Church of Scientology Moscow v. Russia, 5 April 2007, No. 18147/02. Church of the New Faith (Scientology) v. The Commissioner for Payroll Tax ALJRt 57 (1983) 785. Church of X v. the United Kingdom, app. No. 3798/68, 13Y.B. Eur. Conv. On H.R. 306. Cole-Durham, W. and Ferrari, S. (eds.), ‘Law on Religion and the State in Post-Communist Europe’, Peeters Publishers, 2004.
  9. Cumper, P., ‘The Protection of Religious Rights under Section 13 of the Human Rights Act 1998’, [2000] Public Law, 254. Cumper, P., ‘The Rights of Religious Minorities: The Legal Regulation of New Religious Movements, Minority rights’ in the ‘New’ Europe, 165-183, Kluwer Law International, 1999. D v. France No 10