Journals / Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1

Dünyadaki Bölgeler

GLOBES in the GLOBE

Pages
123–139
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

So, the globes are regions here and the globe is the world.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article argues that regionalism arises from safety concerns and power motives and it has a core of political polarization at the global level.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Economic integration which targets to increase trade volumes, stimulate economy and multiply the prosperity of people serves the man s safety motives much more than it does the economic interests; it is a tool of regionalism, so it is a tool for providing security and achieving power.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:So, the globes are regions here and the globe is the world.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This article argues that regionalism arises from safety concerns and power motives and it has a core of political polarization at the global level. Thesis of the article clarifies itself by showing how the economic dimension of globalization is used as a tool of regionalism. Economic integration which targets to increase trade volumes, stimulate economy and multiply the prosperity of people serves the man s safety motives much more than it does the economic interests; it is a tool of regionalism, so it is a tool for providing security and achieving power. European Union as a representative of the highest level in economic integration today is very clear model of this trio: economic region-safety region-power region. So, the globes are regions here and the globe is the world.

Özet

Bu makale, bölgeselciliğin güvenlik kaygıları ve güç motivasyonlarından doğ- duğunu ve küresel seviyede bir siyasi kutuplaşmanın özünü içerisinde taşıdığını iddia etmektedir. Makale, küreselleşmenin ekonomik boyutunun, bölgeselciliğin bir aracı olarak kullanıldığını göstererek kendi tezini belirginleştiriyor. Ekonomiyi canlandırmayı, ticareti ve insanların zenginliğini arttırmayı hedefleyen ekonomik bütünleşme, insanoğlunun iktisadi çıkarlarına hizmet ettiğinden daha fazla, onun güvenlik dürtülerine hizmet etmektedir; ekonomik entegrasyon, bölgeselciliğin ve dolayısıyla güvenlik sağlama ve güç elde etmenin bir aracı olarak kullanılmaktadır. Ekonomik bütünleşmelerin bugün en yüksek seviyesini temsil eden Avrupa Birliği, iktisadi bölge-güvenlik bölgesi-güç bölgesi triyosunun çok açık bir modelidir. Çalışmada küreler bölgeleri, küre ise dünyayı sembolize etmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAGÖZLÜ, Ö. (2022). Dünyadaki Bölgeler. Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1, 123–139. https://ajindex.com/articles/440927

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Adam Smith, An Inquiry into The Nature and Causes of The Wealth of Nations, 2005, http://www2.hn.psu.edu/faculty/jmanis/adam-smith/wealth-nations.pdf (09.05.2014). Alfred Tovias, “A survey of the theory of economic integration.” Journal of European Integration, XV, no. 1, 1991. Andre Sapir, “European Integration at the Crossroads: A Review Essay on the 50th Anniversary of Bela Balassa’s Theory of Economic Integration.” Journal of Economic Literature, 2011, 49:4, 1200–1229. Anthony Giddens, “Modernliğin Küreselleşmesi.” Küresel Dönüşümler. translation Mehmet Celil Çelebi. ed. David Held and Anthony McGrew. Ankara: Phoenix Yayınevi, 2008.
  2. Bela Balassa, The Theory of Economic Integration. Homewood, Illinois: Richard D. Irwin, Inc., 1961. Belgin Akçay, “Ekonomik ve Parasal Birlik”, Avrupa Birliği: Tarihçe, Teoriler, Kurumlar ve Politikalar, ed. Belgin Akçay & İlke Göçmen, Ankara, Seçkin Yayıncılık, 2012. Caroline Freund and Emanuel Ornelas, “Regional Trade Agreements”, The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 5314, 2010.
  3. Coşkun Üçok, Siyasal Tarih, 2. Baskı. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Yayınları, 1978.
  4. Derek W. Urwin, Regions and Regionalism in Europe, ed. Michael Keating. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2004. Edward D. Mansfield and Helen V. Milner. “The New Wave of Regionalism.” International Organization. Vol. 53, No. 3 (Summer, 1999), 589-627. European Commission, “The European Union explained: Enlargement”, 2013, http://europa.eu/pol/pdf/flipbook/en/enlargement_en.pdf (11.05.2014). European Union, “The history of the European Union.” http://europa.eu/abouteu/eu-history/index_en.htm (10.05.2014). Florian Ploeckl, “The Zollverein and the Formation of a Customs Union.” University of Oxford Discussion Papers in Economic and Social History, 2010, http://www.nuff.ox.ac.uk/economics/history/Paper84/ploeckl84.pdf (11.05.2014).
  5. Frans Schrijver, Regionalism after Regionalisation, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2006.
  6. Jacob Viner, The Customs Union Issue. London: Stevens & Sons Limited, 1950. William I. Robinson, 2007, “Theories of Globalization”, http://www.deu.edu.tr/userweb/timucin.yalcinkaya/Theories%20of%20Globali zation.pdf (11.05.2014). Mark Beeson, “Re-thinking Regionalism: Europe and East Asia in Comparative Historical Perspective.” Oceanic Conference on International Studies, Canberra July 14-16, 2004. Michael Keating, “Is there a regional level of government in Europe?” translation Uttam Bharthare. Regions and Regionalism i