Journals / Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2

MIGRATION-DEVELOPMENT-SECURITY NEXUSIN THE CONTEXT OF THE EXTERNALDIMENSIONS OF THE EU POLICIES

AB Politikalarının Dış Boyutları Bağlamında Göç-Kalkınma Güvenlik İlişkisi

Pages
523–552
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We conclude that the securitization of migration underpins the current ambivalent approach to the migration-development nexus in the EU policy-making context.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper questions how migration-development nexus has been conceptualized on the EU policymaking agenda since the early 2000s.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To explore this question, this paper focuses on documents laying out Union’s strategy for the external dimensions of the EU migration policy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We conclude that the securitization of migration underpins the current ambivalent approach to the migration-development nexus in the EU policy-making context.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This paper questions how migration-development nexus has been conceptualized on the EU policymaking agenda since the early 2000s. To explore this question, this paper focuses on documents laying out Union’s strategy for the external dimensions of the EU migration policy. The empirical evidence is gathered from the content analysis of Council Conclusions, Commission’s Communications and Reports, and the secondary literature on external dimensions of the EU migration policy. Our study finds that the already existing securitized approach to migrationdevelopment nexus prevailed after 2015, hollowing out the relation between migration and development with an increasingly narrower focus on development and the new narrative of ‘saving lives’. We conclude that the securitization of migration underpins the current ambivalent approach to the migration-development nexus in the EU policy-making context.

Özet

Bu çalışma, göç-kalkınma ilişkisinin 2000'li yılların başından bu yanaAvrupa Birliği (AB) politikalarında nasıl kurulduğunu sorgulamaktadır. Buamaç doğrultusunda bu makale, AB göç politikasının dış boyutları stratejisini ortaya koyan belgelere odaklanmaktadır. Ampirik veriler;Avrupa Konseyi sonuçları, AB Komisyonunun tebliğ ve raporlarının içerikanalizinden ve AB göç politikasının dış boyutları hakkındaki ikincilliteratürden elde edilmiştir. Çalışmamız, göç-kalkınma ilişkisine dair 2015öncesi de var olan güvenlikleştirilmiş yaklaşımın 2015 sonrası, dar birkalkınma anlayışı ve bu dönemde ortaya çıkan 'hayat kurtarma' anlatısı ilebirlikte, daha çok öne çıktığını ortaya koyar. Göçün güvenlikleştirilmesinin,AB politika oluşturma bağlamında göç-kalkınma ilişkisine yönelik mevcutikircikli yaklaşımın temelini oluşturduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜSTÜBİCİ, A., ERGÜN, K. (2022). MIGRATION-DEVELOPMENT-SECURITY NEXUSIN THE CONTEXT OF THE EXTERNALDIMENSIONS OF THE EU POLICIES. Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2, 523–552. https://ajindex.com/articles/440905

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Adepoju, Aderanti, Femke Van Noorloos, and Annelies Zoomers. “Europe’s Migration Agreements with Migrant-Sending Countries in the Global South: A Critical Review.” International Migration 48, no. 3 (2009): 42–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2435.2009.00529.x.
  2. Boswell, Christina. “Migration in Europe - International Organization for Migration.” (2005) Accessed July 17, 2020. https://www.iom.int/jahia/webdav/site/myjahiasite/shared/shared/mainsite/poli cy_and_research/gcim/rs/RS4.pdf. Boswell, Christina. “The ‘External Dimension’ of EU Immigration and Asylum Policy.” International Affairs 79, no. 3 (2003): 619–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.00326.
  3. Boswell, Christina. European Migration Policies in Flux: Changing Patterns of Inclusion and Exclusion. Oxford: Blackwell, 2003.
  4. Carling, Jørgen, and Cathrine Talleraas. “Root causes and drivers of migration.” Oslo: Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO) (2016): 1-44.
  5. Cassarino, Jean-Pierre. “Informalising readmission agreements in the EU neighbourhood.” The International Spectator 42, no.2 (2007): 179-96.
  6. Castles, Stephen. “Understanding Global Migration: A Social Transformation Perspective.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 2010, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788112376.00007.
  7. Chaloff, Jonathan. Co-development-a myth or a workable policy approach. Rome, Centro Studi di Politica Internazionale, 2005.
  8. Chou, Meng-Hsuan, and Marie Gibert. "From Cotonou to Circular Migration: The EU, Senegal and the “Agreement Duplicity”." Migration: A World in Motion, Maastricht, the Netherlands (2010): 18-20.
  9. Chou, Meng-Hsuan. 'EU and the Migration-Development Nexus: What Prospects for EU Wide Policies? Working paper, Centre on Migration, Policy and Society, 2006. de Haas, Hein. “Migration and Development: A Theoretical Perspective.” International Migration Review 44, no. 1 (2010): 227–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2009.00804.x. de Haas, Hein. Turning the Tide? Why ‘Development Instead of Migration’ Policies Are Bound to Fail. IMI Working Papers 2006, 2006.
  10. Ellerman, David. “Labour Migration: A Developmental Path or a Low-Level Trap?” Development in Practice 15, no. 5 (2005): 617–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520500128646.
  11. Ferreira, Susana. “From Narratives to Perceptions in the Securitisation of the Migratory Crisis in Europe.” E-International Relations, (2018).
  12. Geddes, Andrew. The Politics of Migration and Immigration in Europe. London: Sage, 2003.
  13. Guiraudon, Virginie. “The Constitution of a European