Journals / An International Journal of Optimization and Control: Theories & Applications (IJOCTA) / 2018 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

A pairwise output coding method for multi-class EEG classification of a self-induced BCI

Pages
216–227
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results would bepromising for a real-time study.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In brain computer interface (BCI) research, electroencephalography (EEG) is themost widely used method due to its noninvasiveness, high temporal resolution andportability.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We present a multi-class EEG decoding with anovel pairwise output coding method of EEGs to improve the performance of selfinducedBCI systems.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results would bepromising for a real-time study.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In brain computer interface (BCI) research, electroencephalography (EEG) is themost widely used method due to its noninvasiveness, high temporal resolution andportability. Most of the EEG-based BCI studies are aimed at developingmethodologies for signal processing, feature extraction and classification. In thisstudy, an experimental EEG study was carried out with six subjects performingimagery mental and motor tasks. We present a multi-class EEG decoding with anovel pairwise output coding method of EEGs to improve the performance of selfinducedBCI systems. This method involves an augmented one-versus-onemulticlass classification with less time and reduced number of electrodes.Furthermore, a train repetition number is introduced in the training step to optimizethe data selection. The difference among right and left hemispheres is alsosearched. Finally, the difference between experienced and novice subjects is alsoobserved.The experimental results have demonstrated that, the use of proposed classificationalgorithm produces high classification accuracies (98%) with nine channels.Reduced numbers of channels (four channels) have 100% accuracies for mentaltasks and 87% accuracies for motor tasks with Support Vector Machines (SVM).The classification accuracies are quite high though the proposed one-versus-onetechnique worked well compared to the classical method. The results would bepromising for a real-time study.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZMEN, N. G., GÜMÜŞEL, L. (2022). A pairwise output coding method for multi-class EEG classification of a self-induced BCI. An International Journal of Optimization and Control: Theories & Applications (IJOCTA), Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 216–227. https://ajindex.com/articles/440634

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Wolpaw, J.R., Birbaumer, N., McFarland, D.J., Pfurtscheller, G. & Vaughan, T.M. (2002). BrainComputer Interfaces for Communication and Control, Clinical Neurophysiology, 113, 767-791.
  2. Hwang, H.J., Kim, S., Choi, S. & Im, C.H. (2013). EEG-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces: A Thorough Literature Survey, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 29(12), 814-826.
  3. Brunner, C., Birbaumer, N., Blankertz, B., Guger, C., Kübler, A., Mattia, D., & Ramsey, N. (2015). BNCI Horizon 2020: towards a roadmap for the BCI community. Brain-computer interfaces, 2(1), 1-10.
  4. Mühl, C., Allison, B., Nijholt, A., & Chanel, G. (2014). A survey of affective brain computer interfaces: principles, state-of-the-art, and challenges. Brain-Computer Interfaces, 1(2), 66- 84. Bashashati, A., Fatourechi, M. (2007). A Survey of Signal Processing Algorithms in brain-computer interfaces based on electrical brain signals, Journal of Neural Engineering, 4, 32-57.
  5. Lotte, F., Congedo, M., Lécuyer, A., Lamarche, F. & Arnaldi, B. (2007). A Review of Classification Algortihms for EEG-based Brain-computer Interfaces, Journal of Neural Engineering, 4, R1- R13. Schlögl, A., Lee, F., Bischof, H. & Pfurtscheller, G. (2005). Characterization of four-class Motor Imagery EEG Data for the BCI-competition, Journal of Neural Engineering, 2, L14-L22. Li, T., Zhu, S. & Ogihara, M. (2006). Using Discriminant Analysis for Multi-class Classification: An Experimental Investigation, Knowledge of Information Systems, 10(4), 453- 472. Zhou, S.M., Gan, J.Q., & Sepulveda, F. (2008). Classifying Mental Tasks Based on Features of Higher-order Statistics from EEG Signals in Braincomputer Interface, Information Sciences, 178, 1629-1640.
  6. Liang, N.Y., Saratchandran, P., Huang, G.B. & Sundararajan, N. (2006). Classification of Mental Tasks from EEG Signals Using Extreme Learning Machine, International Journal of Neural Systems, 16(1), 29-38.
  7. Lee, F., Scherer, R., Leeb, R., Neuper, C., Bischof, H., & Pfurtscheller, G. (2005). A comparative analysis of multi-class EEG classification for brain computer interface. In Proceedings of the 10th Computer Vision Winter Workshop (195-204).
  8. Keirn, Z. A., Aunon, J. I. (1990). A New Mode of Communication Between Man and His Surroundings. IEEE Transactions on biomedical engineering, 37,12. Huan, N., Palaniappan, R. (2004). Brain Computer Interface Design Using Mental Task Classification, Multimedia Cyberscape Journal, 1, 35-43.
  9. Flores, M.E., Cortés, J.M.R., Gil, P.G., Aquino, V.A. (20