Journals / An International Journal of Optimization and Control: Theories & Applications (IJOCTA) / 2021 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2

Conic reformulations for Kullback-Leibler divergence constrained distributionally robust optimization and applications

Pages
139–151
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Our computational study in an out of-sample analysis shows that the solutions obtained via the distributionally robust optimization approach yield significantly better performance in terms of the dispersion of the cost realizations while the central tendency deteriorates only slightly compared to the solutions obtained by stochastic programming.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this paper, we consider a Kullback-Leibler divergence constrained distri butionally robust optimization model.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This model considers an ambiguity set that consists of all distributions whose Kullback-Leibler divergence to an empirical distribution is bounded.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Our computational study in an out of-sample analysis shows that the solutions obtained via the distributionally robust optimization approach yield significantly better performance in terms of the dispersion of the cost realizations while the central tendency deteriorates only slightly compared to the solutions obtained by stochastic programming.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this paper, we consider a Kullback-Leibler divergence constrained distri butionally robust optimization model. This model considers an ambiguity set that consists of all distributions whose Kullback-Leibler divergence to an empirical distribution is bounded. Utilizing the fact that this divergence mea sure has an exponential cone representation, we obtain the robust counterpart of the Kullback-Leibler divergence constrained distributionally robust opti mization problem as a dual exponential cone constrained program under mild assumptions on the underlying optimization problem. The resulting conic re formulation of the original optimization problem can be directly solved by a commercial conic programming solver. We specialize our generic formulation to two classical optimization problems, namely, the Newsvendor Problem and the Uncapacitated Facility Location Problem. Our computational study in an out of-sample analysis shows that the solutions obtained via the distributionally robust optimization approach yield significantly better performance in terms of the dispersion of the cost realizations while the central tendency deteriorates only slightly compared to the solutions obtained by stochastic programming.

🔖

Cite This Article

KOCUK, B. (2022). Conic reformulations for Kullback-Leibler divergence constrained distributionally robust optimization and applications. An International Journal of Optimization and Control: Theories & Applications (IJOCTA), Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2, 139–151. https://ajindex.com/articles/440549

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Birge, J. R., & Louveaux, F. (2011). Introduction to stochastic programming. Springer Science & Business Media
  2. Shapiro, A., Dentcheva, D., & Ruszczy´nski, A. (2014). Lectures on stochastic programming: modeling and theory. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics
  3. Ben-Tal, A., & Nemirovski, A. (2002). Robust optimization–methodology and applications. Mathematical Programming, 92(3), 453-480
  4. Ben-Tal, A., El Ghaoui, L., & Nemirovski, A. (2009). Robust optimization. Princeton University Press
  5. Bertsimas, D., Brown, D. B., & Caramanis, C. (2011). Theory and applications of robust optimization. SIAM Review, 53(3), 464-501
  6. Popescu, I. (2007). Robust mean-covariance solutions for stochastic optimization. Operations Research, 55(1), 98–112
  7. Delage, E. and Ye, Y. (2010). Distributionally robust optimization under moment uncertainty with application to data-driven problems. Operations Research, 58(3), 595-612
  8. Wiesemann, W., Kuhn, D., & Sim, M. (2014). Distributionally robust convex optimization. Operations Research, 62(6), 1358-1376
  9. Gao, R. & Kleywegt, A. J. (2016). Distributionally robust stochastic optimization with Wasserstein distance. Optimization Online
  10. Mohajerin Esfahani, P. & Kuhn, D. (2018). Data-driven distributionally robust optimization using the Wasserstein metric: performance guarantees and tractable reformulations. Mathematical Programming, 171(1), 115-166
  11. Hanasusanto, G. A., & Kuhn, D. (2018). Conic programming reformulations of twostage distributionally robust linear programs over Wasserstein balls. Operations Research, 66(3), 849-869
  12. Xie, W. (2019). On distributionally robust chance constrained programs with Wasserstein distance. Mathematical Programming, 1- 41
  13. Ben-Tal, A., Den Hertog, D., De Waegenaere, A., Melenberg, B., & Rennen, G. (2013). Robust solutions of optimization problems affected by uncertain probabilities. Management Science, 59(2), 341-357
  14. Klabjan, D., Simchi-Levi, D., & Song, M. (2013). Robust stochastic lot-sizing by means of histograms. Production and Operations Management, 22(3), 691-710
  15. Jiang, R., & Guan, Y. (2016). Data-driven chance constrained stochastic program. Mathematical Programming, 158(1-2), 291-327
  16. Yanıko˘glu, ˙I., den Hertog, D., & Kleijnen, J. P. (2016). Robust dual-response optimization. IIE Transactions, 48(3), 298-312
  17. Lam, H. (2019). Recovering best statistical guarantees via the empirical divergence-b