Journals / Anestezi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 4

Comparison of Desflurane and Sevoflurane on Myocardial Protection and Inflammation in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

Koroner Arter Bypass Cerrahisinde Desfluran ve Sevofluranın Miyokardiyal Korunma ve İnflamasyon Üzerine Etkilerinin Karşılaştırılması

Pages
243–253
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We think that desflurane can be used as a safe volatile anesthetic agent in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery because of its stable hemodynamic and myocardial protection and anti-inflammatory effects.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study is, in terms of intraoperative myocardial ischemia, to compare the effects of desflurane with sevoflurane to ST-segment changes, cardiac enzyme and tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) values in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grefting surgery (CABGS).
📊
Key Findings & Data:In Group-D TNF-α levels at the post-operative 2nd hour was found significantly lower than Group-S.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We think that desflurane can be used as a safe volatile anesthetic agent in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery because of its stable hemodynamic and myocardial protection and anti-inflammatory effects.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is, in terms of intraoperative myocardial ischemia, to compare the effects of desflurane with sevoflurane to ST-segment changes, cardiac enzyme and tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) values in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grefting surgery (CABGS). Methods: Thirty-one patients undergoing elective CABGS were randomly allocated into two groups; in Group-D desflurane and in Group-S sevoflurane was administered. Hemodynamic parameters, ST-segment changes, cardiac output and minimum alveolar concentrations (MAC) were recorded. Blood samples were drawn for cardiac enzyme and TNF-α assay before induction of anesthesia and at intra- and postoperative time periods. Results: Hemodynamic parameters, ST-segment changes, and cardiac output were similar between the two groups. Creatine kinase-MB and troponin-T values were similar between the groups. In Group-D TNF-α levels at the post-operative 2nd hour was found significantly lower than Group-S. The skin closure and postoperative 24th hour TNF-α values were lower than Group-D. Conclusion: During the anesthesia for CABGS desflurane and sevoflurane protect the myocardium identically that can be detected by ST-segment changes, creatine kinase-MB and troponin-T levels. In the early postoperative period desflurane and in the late postoperative period sevoflurane further suppresses the inflammation response indicated by TNF-α levels. We think that desflurane can be used as a safe volatile anesthetic agent in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery because of its stable hemodynamic and myocardial protection and anti-inflammatory effects.

Özet

Amaç: Çalışmamızda koroner arter bypass greftleme cerrahisi geçirecek hastalarda intraoperatif miyokard iskemisi açısından desfluran ve sevofluran anestezi uygulamalarının ST-segmenti, kardiyak enzim ve TNF-α düzeyleri üzerine etkilerini karşılaştırmayı amaçladık. Yöntem: Elektif koroner arter bypass greftleme cerrahisi planlanan toplam 31 olgu iki gruba randomize edildi ve Grup D’ye desfluran, Grup S’de yer alan hastalara sevofluran anestezik ajan olarak kullanıldı. İntraoperatif dönemde hemodinamik parametreler, ST-segment değişiklikleri, kalp debisi ve kullanılan volatil ajanların minimum alveolar konsantrasyon değerleri takip edildi. Anestezi indüksiyonu öncesi, intraoperatif ve postoperatif belirli dönemlerde alınan kan örneklerinden kardiyak enzim ve tümör nekrotizan faktör-α (TNF-α) ölçümleri yapıldı. Bulgular: Her iki grup arasında kaydedilen hemodinamik parametreler, ST-segment değişikliği ve kalp debisi değerleri arasında farklılık gözlenmedi. Kreatin kinaz-MB ve troponin-T değerlerinde gruplar arasında farklılık bulunmadı. Grup D’de postoperatif 2. saatte ölçülen TNF-α düzeyleri Grup S’ye göre anlamlı olarak daha düşük tespit edildi. Grup S’de cilt kapatıldıktan sonraki ve postoperatif 24. saatte ölçülen TNF-α değerleri Grup D’ye göre daha düşüktü. Sonuç: Desfluran ve sevofluran koroner arter bypass greftleme cerrahisi anestezisinde ST-segment değişikliği, kreatin kinaz-MB ve troponin-T ile belirlenebilen miyokard korunmasını benzer oranda sağlar. Erken postoperatif dönemde desfluran, geç postoperatif dönemde sevofluran TNF-α düzeyleri ile gösterilen inflamasyon yanıtını daha fazla baskılamaktadır. Desfluranın koroner arter bypass greftleme cerrahisinde stabil hemodinami ve miyokard korunması sağlaması ve antiinflamatuar etkileri nedeniyle güvenilir bir volatil anestezik ajan olarak kullanılabileceğini düşünüyoruz.

🔖

Cite This Article

Doğan, A. T., Kurtipek, Ö. (2022). Comparison of Desflurane and Sevoflurane on Myocardial Protection and Inflammation in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery. Anestezi Dergisi, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 4, 243–253. https://ajindex.com/articles/440433

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. De Hert SG, Turani F, Mathur S, Stowe DF. Cardioprotection with volatile anesthetics: mechanisms and clinical implications. Anesth Analg. 2005;100:1584-93
  2. Warltier DC, Pagel PS, Kersten JR. Approaches to the prevention of perioperative myocardial ischemia. Anesthesiology. 2000;92:253-9.
  3. Suleiman MS, Zacharowski K, Angelini GD. Inflammatory response and cardioprotection during open-heart surgery: the importance of anaesthetics. Br J Pharmacol. 2007;153:21-33.
  4. Hall RI, Smith MS, Rocker G. The systemic inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass: pathophysiological, therapeutic, and pharmacological considerations. Anesth Analg. 1997;85:766-82.
  5. El Azab SR, Rosseel PM, De Lange JJ, et al. Effect of sevoflurane on the ex vivo secretion of TNF-alpha during and after coronary artery bypass surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2003;20:380-4.
  6. De Hert SG. The concept of anaesthetic-induced cardioprotection: clinical relevance. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2005;19:445-59.
  7. Zaugg M, Lucchinetti E, Garcia C, Pasch T, Spahn DR, Schaub MC. Anaesthetics and cardiac preconditioning. Part II. Clinical implications. Br J Anaesth. 2003;91:566- 76.
  8. Annachhatre AS, Annachhatre SR. Preconditioning in cardiac anesthesia, where are we? Ann Card Anaesth. 2019;22:412-21.
  9. McMullan V, Alston RP, Tyrrell J. Volatile anaesthesia during cardiopulmonary bypass. Perfusion. 2015;30:6- 16.
  10. Biccard BM. Detection and management of perioperative myocardial ischemia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2014;27:336-43.
  11. Rapp HJ, Rabethge S, Luiz T, Haux P. Perioperative ST-segment depression and troponin T release. Identification of patients with highest risk for myocardial damage. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1999;43:124-9.
  12. Murry CE, Jennings RB, Reimer KA. Preconditioning with ischemia: a delay of lethal cell injury in ischemic myocardium. Circulation. 1986;74:1124-36.
  13. Gemalmaz H, Gültekin Y, Kural T. Açık kalp cerrahisinde 72 saatlik trimetazidin uygulamasının miyokard iskemisi üzerine etkileri. Kır