Journals / Anestezi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2

EVLW and its Importance in Fluid Management

Sıvı Yönetiminde EVLW ve Önemi

Pages
83–91
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

EVLW measurement is expected to gain importance in the hemodynamic measurement of ALI/ARDS patients and future studies will benefit from focusing on EVLW based fluid therapy

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Fluid management and optimization is one of the most frequently observed problems in anesthe- siology and critical care.
📊
Key Findings & Data:An ideal hemodynamic management increases oxygen supply to tissues, improves postoperative outcomes and decreases surgical costs.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:EVLW measurement is expected to gain importance in the hemodynamic measurement of ALI/ARDS patients and future studies will benefit from focusing on EVLW based fluid therapy
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Fluid management and optimization is one of the most frequently observed problems in anesthe- siology and critical care. An ideal hemodynamic management increases oxygen supply to tissues, improves postoperative outcomes and decreases surgical costs. Extravascular lung water (EVLW) measurement has gained widespread acceptance in the early prediction and management of adverse effects caused by fluid treatment. The fundamental aim of acute circulatory failure treat- ment is to improve tissue perfusion and oxygenation while avoiding fluid overload. EVLW consists of extravascular interstitial, intracellular, alveolar and lymphatic fluid in the lungs and its normal values are 3-7 ml kg-1. Studies have reported that values above 10 ml kg-1 as a cut-off value points to pulmonary edema. Although the gold standard in EVLW measurement is the gravimetric method, lung ultrasound and transpulmonary thermodilution is more widely utilized since gravi- metric measurement can only be performed post-mortem. EVLW measurement is expected to gain importance in the hemodynamic measurement of ALI/ARDS patients and future studies will benefit from focusing on EVLW based fluid therapy

Özet

Sıvı yönetimi ve optimizasyonu, anesteziyoloji ve yoğun bakımda sık karşılaşılan günlük sorunlar- dandır. İdeal hemodinamik yönetim dokulara oksijen sunumunu arttırmakta, postoperatif sonuç- ları iyileştirmekte ve cerrahi maliyeti düşürmektedir. Sıvı tedavisinin istenmeyen etkilerinin erken öngörülmesi ve takibinde damar dışı akciğer sıvısı (EVLW) ölçümü giderek kabul gören bir yöntem haline gelmiştir. Akut dolaşım yetmezliği tedavisinde temel amaç doku perfüzyonunu ve oksjeni- zasyonunu iyileştirirken sıvı yüklenmesinden kaçınmaktır. EVLW, akciğerlerde pulmoner damarlar dışında bulunan interstisyel, intrasellüler, alveoler ve lenfatik sıvıyı kapsar ve sağlıklı kişilerde normal değerleri 3-7 ml kg-1’dir. Bu konudaki çalışmalar, cut-off değeri olarak 10 ml kg-1 üzerinde- ki değerlerin pulmoner ödeme işaret ettiğini göstermiştir. EVLW ölçümünde altın standart gravi- metrik yöntem olmakla birlikte, post-mortem yapılabilmesi nedeniyle günümüzde akciğer ultra- sonografisi ve transpulmoner termodilüsyon teknikleri daha yaygın kullanılmaktadır. Gelecekte özellikle ALI/ARDS hastalarının hemodinamik yönetiminde EVLW ölçümünün önemli bir yer tut- ması beklenmektedir ve bu alanda yapılacak çalışmaların EVLW bazlı sıvı tedavisine odaklanması yararlı olacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yılmaz, H., Kazbek, B. K., Ekmekçi, P. (2022). EVLW and its Importance in Fluid Management. Anestezi Dergisi, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2, 83–91. https://ajindex.com/articles/440418

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Cannesson M. Arterial Pressure Variation and Goal- Directed Fluid Therapy. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2010;24:487-97.
  2. Monnet X, Teboul JL. My patient has received fluid. How to assess its efficacy and side effects? Ann Intensive Care. 2018;8:15.
  3. Kuiper AN, Trof RJ, Groeneveld ABJ. Mixed venous O2 saturation and fluid responsiveness after cardiac or major vascular surgery. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;8:189.
  4. Mekontso-Dessap A, Castelain V, Anguel N, et al. Combination of venoarterial PCO2 difference with arteriovenous O2 content difference to detect anaero- bic metabolism in patients. Intensive Care Med. 2002;28:272-7.
  5. Monnet X, Teboul JL. Assessment of fluid responsive- ness: Recent advances. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2018;24:190-5.
  6. Monnet X, Teboul JL. Transpulmonary thermodilution: Advantages and limits. Crit Care. 2017;21:147.
  7. Lee CWC, Kory PD, Arntfield RT. Development of a fluid resuscitation protocol using inferior vena cava and lung ultrasound. J Crit Care. 2016;31:96-100.
  8. Jozwiak M, Silva S, Persichini R, et al. Extravascular lung water is an independent prognostic factor in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:472-80.
  9. Wang W, Yu X, Zuo F, et al. Risk factors and the associ- ated limit values for abnormal elevation of extravascu- lar lung water in severely burned adults. Burns. 2019;45:849-59.
  10. Malbrain ML, Marik PE, Witters I, et al. Fluid overload, de-resuscitation, and outcomes in critically ill or inju- red patients: a systematic review with suggestions for clinical practice. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2014;46:361-80.
  11. Cordemans C, de Laet I, van Regenmortel N, et al. Aiming for a negative fluid balance in patients with acute lung injury and increased intraabdominal pres- sure: A pilot study looking at the effects of PAL- treatment. Ann Intensive Care. 2012;2:S15.
  12. Eichhorn V, Goepfert MS, Eulenburg C, Malbrain MLNG, Reuter DA. Comparison of values in critically ill pati- ents for global end-diastolic volume and extrava