Journals / Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 6

Defense Expenditures and Income Inequality: Evidence from Chosen Euro Using Countries

Savunma Harcamaları ve Gelir Eşitsizliği: Seçilmiş Avro Kullanıcısı Ülkelerden Kanıtlar

Pages
121–127
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Applying cointegration andcausality tests to the panel data, the paper aims to fill the gap about income inequality and defenseexpenditures relation in the literature.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper, aims to find the cointegration and the causality between income inequality and defenseexpenditures in fifteen European Union member countries that used euro currency before, duringand after the global economic crises in the period of 2005-2016.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This paper, aims to find the cointegration and the causality between income inequality and defenseexpenditures in fifteen European Union member countries that used euro currency before, duringand after the global economic crises in the period of 2005-2016.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Applying cointegration andcausality tests to the panel data, the paper aims to fill the gap about income inequality and defenseexpenditures relation in the literature.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005-2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This paper, aims to find the cointegration and the causality between income inequality and defenseexpenditures in fifteen European Union member countries that used euro currency before, duringand after the global economic crises in the period of 2005-2016. Applying cointegration andcausality tests to the panel data, the paper aims to fill the gap about income inequality and defenseexpenditures relation in the literature.

Özet

Bu çalışma, 2005-2016 döneminde küresel ekonomik kriz öncesinde, sırasında ve sonrasında avro kullanan on beş Avrupa Birliği üyesi ülkedeki gelir eşitsizliği ve savunma harcamaları arasındaki eş bütünleşme ve nedenselliği bulmayı amaçlamaktadır. Panel verisine eş bütünleşme ve nedensellik testleri uygulanarak gelir eşitsizliği ve savunma harcamaları ilişkisine dair literatürdeki eksikliğin doldurulması amaçlanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇENBERCİ, E. (2022). Defense Expenditures and Income Inequality: Evidence from Chosen Euro Using Countries. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 6, 121–127. https://ajindex.com/articles/440367

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Abell, J.D. (1994). Military spending and income inequality. Journal of Peace Research, 31(1): 35–43.
  2. Akbaş, Y.E., Şentürk, M. & Sancar, C., (2013). Testing for Causality between the Foreign Direct Investment, Current Account Deficit, GDP and Total Credit: Evidence from G7. Panoeconomicus, 6: 791-812 Doi: 10.2298/PAN1306791A. Aksoğan, G. & Elveren, A.Y. (2012).
  3. Defence, Health and Education Expenditures and Income Inequality in Turkey (1970-2008): An Econometric Analysis. Sosyoekonomi, 1: 263-280.
  4. Ali, H. E. & Galbraith, J. (2003). Military Expenditures and Inequality: Empirical Evidence from Global Data. The University of Texas at Austin UTIP Working Paper, No. 24 Ali, Hamid E. (2007). Military Expenditures and Inequality: Empirical Evidence from Global Data. Defence and Peace Economics, 18:519-535. DOI: 10.1080/10242690701331501. Ali H., (2012). Military Expenditures and Inequality in The Middle East and North Africa: A Panel Analysis. Defense and Peace Economics, 23(6):575-589 DOI:10.1080/10242694.2012.663578. Anoruo, E. & Elike, U. (2015). Human Capital-Economic Growth Nexus in Africa: Heterogeneous Panel Causality Approach. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 5 (4): 1017-1023, https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eco:journ1: 2015- 04-22.
  5. Asteriou, D. & Hall, S.G. (2007). Applied Econometrics: A Modern Approach Using Eviews and Microfit Revisited Edition. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Bangake, C. & Eggoh, J.C. (2012). Pooled mean group estimation of international capital mobility in Africa countries. Research in Economics, 66 (1): 7–17.
  6. Bildirici, M. (2004a). Real Cost of Employment an Turkish Labour Market: A Panel Cointegration Tests Approach. International Journal of Applied Econometrics and Quantitative Studies, 1(2):95-120. Bildirici,M. (2004b). Political Instability and Growth: An Econometric Analysis of Turkey, Mexico, Argentina and Brazil, 1985 – 2004. Applied Econometrics and International Development, 4(4):5-26.
  7. Bildirici, M. & Bohur, E. (2015). Design and Economic Growth: Panel Cointegration and Causality Analysis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 210:193- 202 DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.359. Binbin, M., William, L. & Xiangqian, L. (2015). Defense Expenditure and Income Inequality: Evidence on Cointegration and Causality for China. Defence and Peace Economics, 26(3): 327-339, DOI: 10.1080/10242694.2013.810026. Dumitrescu, E. I. & Hurlin, C. (2012). Testing for Granger Non-Causality in Heterogeneous Panels. Econ