Journals / Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 5

Corporate Governance and Performance of Islamic Banks: A Comparative Study of Banks in Malaysia and the GCC Countries

İslami Bankalarda Kurumsal Yönetişim ve Performans: Malezya ve Körfez Işbirliği Konseyi Ülkelerindeki Bankaların Karşılaştırmalı Bir Çalışması

Pages
1477–1487
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the univariate test results, Malaysian banks wereperformed better than the GCC banks in terms of ROE and Tobin`s Q.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper contributes to the literature by discussing the relationship between corporate governanceand performance of Islamic banks operating in Malaysia and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC)countries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The effects of board independence and board size on performance are examined by usingrelevant analyses.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the univariate test results, Malaysian banks wereperformed better than the GCC banks in terms of ROE and Tobin`s Q.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This paper contributes to the literature by discussing the relationship between corporate governanceand performance of Islamic banks operating in Malaysia and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC)countries. The effects of board independence and board size on performance are examined by usingrelevant analyses. The paper finds that there was a significant and negative relationship betweenROA and board independence and it was also a significant predictor of ROE. Malaysian banks wereperformed better than the GCC banks by comparing the average ROE and ROA and they also hadmore independent directors. According to the univariate test results, Malaysian banks wereperformed better than the GCC banks in terms of ROE and Tobin`s Q.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Malezya'da ve Körfez İşbirliği Konseyi (KİK) ülkelerinde faaliyet gösteren İslami bankaların kurumsal yönetişimi ve performansları arasındaki ilişkiyi tartışarak yazına katkıda bulunmaktır. Yönetim kurulu bağımsızlığının ve büyüklüğünün banka performansı üzerindeki etkileri ilgili analizler kullanılarak incelenmiştir. Çalışma, aktif karlılığı ve kurul bağımsızlığı arasında anlamlı negatif bir ilişki olduğunu ve aynı zamanda aktif karlılığının öz sermaye karlılığının önemli bir yordayıcısı olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Öz sermaye karlılığı ve aktif karlılığı ortalamaları bakımından Malezya bankalarının KİK bankalarından daha iyi performans gösterdikleri ve ayrıca daha bağımsız yönetim kurullarına sahip oldukları bulunmuştur. Tek değişkenli test sonuçlarına göre ise, Malezya bankalarının öz sermaye karlılığı ve Tobin Q oranları açısından KİK bankalarından daha iyi performans gösterdikleri ortaya konmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖNAL, M. M. (2022). Corporate Governance and Performance of Islamic Banks: A Comparative Study of Banks in Malaysia and the GCC Countries. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 5, 1477–1487. https://ajindex.com/articles/440351

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Adams, R., & H. Mehran. (2002). “Board Structure and Banking Firm Performance.” Unpublished paper, Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Aebi, V., Sabato, G. & Schmid, M. (2012). Risk management, corporate governance, and bank performance in the financial crisis. Journal of Banking and Finance, 36, 3213-3226.
  2. Almutairi, A. R., & Quttainah, M. A (2017). Corporate governance: Evidence from Islamic banks. Social Responsibility Journal, 13(3), 601-624.
  3. Arslan, O., Karan, M. B. & Eksi, C. (2010). Board structure and corporate performance. Managing Global Transitions, 8, 3-22.
  4. Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A. & Merrucher, O. (2013). Islamic vs. conventional banking: Business model, efficiency, and stability. Journal of Banking and Finance, 37, 433-447.
  5. Beltratti, A., & Stulz, R. M. (2012). The credit crisis around the globe: Why did some banks perform better? Journal of Financial Economics, 105(1), 1-17.
  6. Chapra, M. & Ahmed, H. (2002). Corporate Governance in Islamic Financial Institutions. Occasional Paper No. 6 (Islamic Research and Training Institute: Islamic Development Bank, Jeddah). Erkens, D. H., Hung, M. & Matos, P. (2012). Corporate governance in the 2007-2008 financial crisis: Evidence from financial institutions worldwide. Journal of Corporate Finance, 18(2), 389-411. Financial Reporting Council. (FRC 1992). The Cadbury Report: The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance, London: Burgess Science Press.
  7. Grais, W., & Pellegrini, M. (2006). Corporate Governance in Institutions Offering Islamic Financial Services: Issues and Options, Policy Research Working Paper 4052, (Washington, World Bank, November 2006).
  8. Grassa, R. & Matoussi, H. (2014). Corporate governance of Islamic banks: A comparative study between GCC and Southeast Asia countries. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 7(3), 346-362.
  9. Haniffa, R., & Hudaib, M. (2006). Corporate Governance Structure and Performance of Malaysian Listed Companies. Journal of Business, Finance & Accounting, 33(7-8), 1034-1062.
  10. Hidayat, S. E., & Abduh, M. (2012). Does financial crisis give impacts on Bahrain Islamic banking performance? A panel regression analysis. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 4(7), 79-87.
  11. Judge, W. Q., Naoumova, I., & Koutzevol, N. (2003). Corporate governance and firm performance in Russia: An empirical study. Journal of World Business, 38, 385-396.
  12. Khandelwal, S. K., & Aljifri, K. (2016). Corporate governance in Islamic banks: A comparative study of