SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

Determination and Analysis of Errors and Misconceptions of Primary 4th and 5th Grade Students in Decimal Numbers

4. ve 5. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Ondalık Gösterim Konusundaki Kavram Yanılgılarının ve Hatalarının Tespiti ve Analizi

Ersin PALABIYIK
Kemal ALTIPARMAK
Pages
447–470
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the findings of the study, the students who participated in the study had misconceptions about the decimal representations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:One of the aims of this study is to identify the misconceptions and mistakes of the 4th and 5th grade students of the elementary school about the decimal numbers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, the related literature was analyzed to determine the misconceptions and errors of the 4th and 5th grade students on the decimal representation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the findings of the study, the students who participated in the study had misconceptions about the decimal representations.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

One of the aims of this study is to identify the misconceptions and mistakes of the 4th and 5th grade students of the elementary school about the decimal numbers. The other aim of the study is to determine how to evaluate the "error and misconception diagnostic test". The method used in the study was descriptive survey and aimed to reveal the current situation of the students. For this purpose, the related literature was analyzed to determine the misconceptions and errors of the 4th and 5th grade students on the decimal representation. Taking into consideration the opinions of the 3 specialists in mathematics education, a three-step "error and misconception diagnostic test" consisting of 28 questions was prepared. Pilot application was made with 100 students to determine the reliability of this measurement tool. The data were entered into SPSS and the value of the test was found to be 0.75 for the KR-20. According to the findings of the study, the students who participated in the study had misconceptions about the decimal representations.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amaçlarından birisi ilköğretim 4. ve 5. sınıf öğrencilerinin ondalık gösterim konusundaki kavram yanılgılarının ve hatalarının tespit edilmesidir. Çalışmanın diğer amacı ise "hata ve kavram yanılgıları teşhis testinin" nasıl değerlendirileceğini belirlemektir. Çalışmada kullanılan yöntem tarama modeli olup öğrencilerin mevcut durumunu ortaya koymak amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaçla, 4. ve 5. sınıf öğrencilerinin ondalık gösterim konusundaki kavram yanılgılarını ve hatalarını tespit etmek için ilgili alan yazın analiz edilmiş ve matematik eğitiminde uzman 3 eğitimcinin görüşleri de dikkate alınarak 28 sorudan oluşan üç aşamalı "hata ve kavram yanılgıları teşhis testi" adlı bir test hazırlanmıştır. Bu ölçme aracının güvenirliğinin belirlenmesi amacıyla 100 öğrenci ile pilot uygulaması yapılmıştır. Veriler SPSS'e girilmiştir ve testin KR-20 değeri 0.75 olarak bulunmuştur. Çalışma bulgularına göre çalışmaya katılan öğrencilerde ondalık gösterimler konusunda kavram yanılgıları görülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

PALABIYIK, E., ALTIPARMAK, K. (2022). Determination and Analysis of Errors and Misconceptions of Primary 4th and 5th Grade Students in Decimal Numbers. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 447–470. https://ajindex.com/articles/440285

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Aiken, L. R. (1976). Update on attitudes and other affective variables in learning mathematics. Review of Educational Research, 46(2), 293-311.
  2. Ball, D. L. (1990). The mathematical understandings that prospective teachers bring to teacher education. Elementary School Journal, 90, 449-466.
  3. Barnes, M. (1998). Dealing with misconceptions about probability. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 54(10), 17-20.
  4. Batanero, C., & Serrano, L. (1999). The meaning of randomness for secondary school students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(5), 558-567.
  5. Bezzina F. (2004). Pupils' understanding of probabilistic & statistics (14-15+) difficulties and insights for instruction. Journal of Maltese Education Research, 2(1), 53-67.
  6. Bingölbali, E., & Özmantar, M. F. (2009). Matematiksel kavram yanılgıları: Sebepleri ve çözüm arayışları. In M. F. Özmantar, & E. Bingölbali (Eds.), İlköğretimde karşılaşılan matematiksel zorluklar ve çözüm önerileri. Ankara:
  7. PegemA Yayıncılık. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7-74.
  8. Brown, C. A., & Baird, J. (1993). Inside the teacher: Knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes. In P. Wilson (Ed.), Research ideas in the classroom: High school mathematics (pp. 245-259). New York: Macmillan. Bulut, S. (2001). Matematik öğretmen adaylarının olasılık performanslarının incelenmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 20, 33-39.
  9. Burguillo, J.C. (2010). Using game theory and competition-based learning to stimulate student motivation and performance. Computers and Education, 55, 566-575.
  10. Centra, J. A., & Potter, D. A. (1980). School and teacher effects: An inter-relational model. Review of Educational Research, 50 (2), 273- 291. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education. London and New York: Routledge Falmer. Cornu, B. (1991). Limits. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking. Boston: Kluwer. Crook, T. J. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practice on student. Review of Educational Research, 58(4), 438-481.
  11. Çakmak, M. (1999). Novice and experienced teachers' strategies for mathematics teaching in english and Turkish primary classrooms. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Leicester University, England. Çakmak, Z. T., & Durmuş, S. (2015). İlköğretim 6-8. sınıf öğrencilerinin istatistik ve olasılık öğrenme alanında zorlandıkları kavram ve konuların belirlenmesi. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(2), 27-58. Çelik