Journals / Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3

The Recognition of States in International Law and Recognition Theories

Uluslararası Hukukta Devletleri Tanıma ve Tanıma Teorileri

Pages
923–945
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Even if it is like that, this political judgment has to have a legal dressing on itself

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The problem of defining recognition term in international law and as well in international politics is considered as one of the most difficult and complicated topic.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Although the issue of recognition has been seen as a topic of international law, it is not possible to separate it from politics and domestic law.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Even if it is like that, this political judgment has to have a legal dressing on itself
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The problem of defining recognition term in international law and as well in international politics is considered as one of the most difficult and complicated topic. When a state gains its independence through a declaration which is based upon self-determination principle, the issue of its recognition comes forward. In International law, to recognize such a state means to accept its legitimate existence. Although the issue of recognition has been seen as a topic of international law, it is not possible to separate it from politics and domestic law. In parallel with that fact, the elements of juristic and politics are needed to be taken into consideration in the act of recognition. However, states usually rely on their political choices on the recognition issue rather than on other components. The case of recognition justifies the territorial aspirations of newly emerged states and thus the issue of recognition becomes much more complicated. Because of the fact that the act of recognition doesn’t fulfill simply the recognition of a newly emerged state or government, it includes the endorsement of the land under the sovereignty of the state and government. Today, to be recognized by other states is more important than fulfilling the conditions of being statehood for a newly emerged state, because the recognition is a political judgment rather than legal considerations in its essence. Even if it is like that, this political judgment has to have a legal dressing on itself

Özet

Gerek uluslararası hukuk ve gerekse uluslararası ilişkilerde tanımlaması en zor ve hatta en karmaşık kavramlardan biri de tanımadır. Uluslararası tanıma, kendi kaderini belirleme yoluyla ortaya çıkmış yeni bir devletin varlığını hukuki olarak kabul etme anlamına gelmektedir. Ancak tanıma meselesinde siyaset, uluslararası hukuk ve iç hukuk gibi alanlar iç içe geçmiş bulunmaktadır. Tanıma eyleminde hukuki ve siyasal unsurlar birlikte göz önünde bulundurulmasına rağmen, devletler daha çok siyasi tercihlerini esas almaktadırlar. Tanıma, belirli bir toprak parçası üzerindeki hak iddialarını da tanımak ve kabul etmeyi içerir. Kuşkusuz bu durum tanıma meselesini ciddi anlamda karmaşık bir hale getirmektedir. Çünkü tanıma sadece bir devlet veya hükümeti tanımakla bitmemekte, o devlet ve hükümetin egemenliğindeki toprakları da kapsamaktadır. Günümüzde tanıma, bir devletin devlet olma koşullarını yerine getirmesinin ötesinde yer alan bazı olguları da içeren bir hal almıştır. Çünkü tanıma, özü itibariyle siyasi bir yargıdır. Ancak bu siyasi yargıya mutlaka hukuki bir elbise giydirilmelidir

🔖

Cite This Article

KIRAN, A. (2022). The Recognition of States in International Law and Recognition Theories. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3, 923–945. https://ajindex.com/articles/440274

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Albert, M., & Hilkermeier, L. (Eds.). (2004). Observing international relations: Niklas Luhmann and world politics. London: Routledge. Algan, B. (2004). Rethinking ‘third generation’human rights. Ankara Law Review, 1(1), 121-155.
  2. Anderson, D. R. C. (1995). The collapse of Yugoslavia: Background and summary. Research Paper No. 14. Department of the Parliamentary Library. Araujo, F. R. (2000).
  3. Sovereignty, Human Rights, and Self-Determination: The Meaning of International Law. Fordham International Law Journal, 24(1), 1477-1532.
  4. Azarkan, E. (2016). Devletlerin Tanınması ve 1933 Montevideo Sözleşmesi. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 15(4), 1055-1068.
  5. Body, J.A. (1977). Digest of United States Practice of International Law. Caplan, R. (2005). Europe and the recognition of new states in Yugoslavia. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  6. Cedeno, V. R. (2003). Unilateral Acts of States. Document A/CN.4/534, 195-211.
  7. Crawford, J. (1977). The criteria for statehood in international law. British Yearbook of International Law, 48(1), 93-182.
  8. Danilo, T. (1993). Recognition of States: A Comment. European Journal of International Law, 4(1), 66-71.
  9. Denza, E. (2011). European Practice on the Recognition of States. European Law Review, 36(3), 321-339. Dimitrijević, D. (2006). The new international legal order and new states in the Balkans. Medjunarodni Problemi, 58(3), 272-293.
  10. Duursma, J. (1996). Fragmentation and the International Relations of Micro-states: Selfdetermination and Statehood (Vol. 2). USA: Cambridge University Press.
  11. Eastwood Jr, L. S. (1992). Secession: state practice and international law after the dissolution of the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia. Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law, 3, 299-349.
  12. Eckert, A. E. (2002). Constructing States: The Role of the International Community in the Creation of New States. Journal of Public and International Affairs, 13, 19-39. European Community: Declaration on Yugoslavia and on the Guidelines on the Recognition of New States. (1992). International Legal Materials, 31(6), 1485-1487. (Erişim: 02.11.2016), http://www.jstor.org/stable/20693758
  13. Fromkin, D. (2001). A peace to end all peace: The fall of the Ottoman Empire and the creation of the modern Middle East. Macmillan. Fukuyama, F. (2011). The origins of political order: From prehuman times to the French Revolution. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. General Assembly, Twenty-third Session, Resolution No:2379 (XXIII), 25 October 1968 Gözler,