Journals / Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

Ranking of Provinces in terms of Effective Use of Accommodation Capacity by DEA Based TOPSIS Method

VZA Temelli TOPSIS Metodu ile Konaklama Kapasitesinin Etkin Kullanımı Açısından İllerin Sıralanması

Pages
539–558
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to ERM-DT and entropy method, the efficient use of accommodation capacity of the provinces were formed respectively; Konya, Afyon, Gaziantep, Mersin, Balıkesir, Bursa, Nevşehir, Aydın, Ankara, İzmir, Antalya, Muğla and İstanbul.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study is examined that provinicals rankings according to efficiency level of the using accommodation capacity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:ERM-DT (Data Envelopment Analysis and TOPSIS-based Event Ranking) method was used to measure and rank the efficiency of decision-making units (DMUprovinces).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to ERM-DT and entropy method, the efficient use of accommodation capacity of the provinces were formed respectively; Konya, Afyon, Gaziantep, Mersin, Balıkesir, Bursa, Nevşehir, Aydın, Ankara, İzmir, Antalya, Muğla and İstanbul.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study is examined that provinicals rankings according to efficiency level of the using accommodation capacity. ERM-DT (Data Envelopment Analysis and TOPSIS-based Event Ranking) method was used to measure and rank the efficiency of decision-making units (DMUprovinces). This method uses an approach combining Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and TOPSIS preference order technique. In ERM-DT, the inputs and outputs of the production function are created according to the DEA method, and then the values of the TOPSIS Decision Matrix are reached by using the basic efficiency formula. ERM-DT allows to the decision maker the selection of the weight of available criteria required for the decision point. In this context, the entropy method is used in determining the weights of the criteria in the study. According to ERM-DT and entropy method, the efficient use of accommodation capacity of the provinces were formed respectively; Konya, Afyon, Gaziantep, Mersin, Balıkesir, Bursa, Nevşehir, Aydın, Ankara, İzmir, Antalya, Muğla and İstanbul.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, konaklama kapasitesi kullanımı etkinlik düzeylerine göre illerin sıralanması konusu ele alınmıştır. Karar verme birimlerinin (KVB-illerin) etkinliğini ölçmek ve sıralamak üzere Veri Zarflama Analizi ve TOPSIS Temelli Etkinlik Sıralama (ESM-VT) yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Bu yöntem, Veri Zarflama Analizi (VZA) ile TOPSIS tercih sırası tekniğini birleştiren bir yaklaşım kullanılmaktadır. ESM-VT'de, VZA metoduna göre üretim fonksiyonunun girdi ve çıktıları oluşturulmakta daha sonra temel etkinlik formülü kullanılarak TOPSIS Karar Matrisinin değerlerine ulaşılmaktadır. ESM-VT, karar vericiye, karar verme noktasında gerekli mevcut kriterlerin ağırlıklarının seçilmesine imkân vermektedir. Bu bağlamda çalışmada kriter ağırlıklarının belirlenmesinde Entropi yöntemi kullanılmıştır. ESM-VT ve Entropi yöntemlerine göre illerin konaklama kapasitesi kullanım etkinliği sırasıyla Konya, Afyon, Gaziantep, Mersin, Balıkesir, Bursa, Nevşehir, Aydın, Ankara, İzmir, Antalya, Muğla, İstanbul şeklinde oluşmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖRAL, R., DİNÇER, F. İ. (2022). Ranking of Provinces in terms of Effective Use of Accommodation Capacity by DEA Based TOPSIS Method. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 539–558. https://ajindex.com/articles/440270

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Bian, Y. W., & Xu, H. (2013). DEA ranking method based upon virtual envelopment frontier and TOPSIS. System Engineering Theory and Practice, 33(2), 482-488.
  2. Bosetti, V., Cassinelli, M., & Lanza, A. (2004). Using data envelopment analysis to evaluate environmentally conscious tourism management. FEEM Working Paper No. 59.04. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.541124 Chitnis, A., & Vaidya, O. S. (2016). Efficiency ranking method using DEA and TOPSIS (ERM-DT): case of an Indian bank. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 23(1), 165-182. doi: 10.1108/BIJ-09-2013-0093
  3. Cook, W. D., & Seiford, L. M. (2009). Data envelopment analysis (DEA)-Thirty years on. European journal of operational research, 192(1), 1-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.01.032 Çınar, Y. (2004). Çok Nitelikli Karar Verme ve Bankaların Mali Performanslarının Değerlendirilmesi Örneği. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Ankara:
  4. Ankara Üniversitesi.
  5. Fare, R., Kirkley, J. E., & Walden, J. B. (2007). Estimating Capacity and Efficiency in Fisheries with Undesirable Outputs. VIMS Marine Resource Report No. 2007-6.
  6. Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 120(3), 253-290. doi: 10.2307/2343100 Hwang, S. N., & Chang, T. Y. (2003). Using data envelopment analysis to measure hotel managerial efficiency change in Taiwan. Tourism Management, 24(4), 357-369. doi: 10.1016/S0261-5177(02)00112-7
  7. Karaemir, Ç. (2013). Eğitim merkezlerinde etkinlik Analizleri: Veri Zarflama Analizi Kullanarak Performans Analizi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Ankara:
  8. Ankara Üniversitesi.
  9. Lasso, P. H. (1986). Evaluating hospital performance through simultaneous application of several indicators. Bulletin of the Pan American Health Orhanization, 20(4), 341- 357. Lotfi, F. H., Fallahnejad, R., & Navidi, N. (2011). Ranking efficient units in DEA by using TOPSIS method. Applied Mathematical Sciences, 5(17), 805-815.
  10. Luo, H., Yang, Y., & Law, R. (2014). How to achieve a high efficiency level of the hotel industry?. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 26(8), 1140-1161. doi: 10.1108/IJCHM-01-2013-0050
  11. Min, H., Min, H., & Joo, S. J. (2008). A data envelopment analysis-based balanced scorecard for measuring the comparative efficiency of Korean luxury hotels. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 25(4), 349-365. doi: 10.1108/02656710810865249 Morey, R. C., & Dittman, D. A. (2003). Evaluating a hotel GM's performance A case study in benchmarking. The Cornell