Journals / Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3

Comparative Advertisings from Marketing Perspective

Pazarlama Perspektifinden Karşılaştırmalı Reklamlar

Pages
899–921
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There are need points to pay attention when using comparative ads to avoid adverse events

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to explain basic concepts of comparative advertising through marketing perspective.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Comparative advertisements were firstly appeared in the 1900s and legal obstacles with regard to use of direct comparative advertising were removed in United States by 1971.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There are need points to pay attention when using comparative ads to avoid adverse events
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explain basic concepts of comparative advertising through marketing perspective. After the near future removal of the formal barriers against direct comparative advertising in Turkey, it will begin to appear at different mediums. There are different types of comparative advertising, such as direct comparative advertising and, indirect comparative advertising. Comparative advertisements were firstly appeared in the 1900s and legal obstacles with regard to use of direct comparative advertising were removed in United States by 1971. Direct comparative advertising has both advantages and disadvantages. When compared to noncomparative advertising, positive aspects of direct comparative advertising are informing and persuading the consumer, helping the consumer to make better comparisons among competing brands, encouraging competition, improving product features, helping to reduce the market barriers for newcomers. Yet there are also negative aspects to it such as, it is more likely to cause consumer confusion and to reduce honesty and impartiality and also it is more likely to cause fierce competition against companies and increase the number of bad attitudes regarding advertisement, if it is used carelessly it can result in legal ramifications. There are need points to pay attention when using comparative ads to avoid adverse events

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, pazarlama bakışı açısı ile karşılaştırmalı reklamların temel kavramlarını açıklamaktır. Türkiye'de doğrudan karşılaştırmalı reklama yönelik yasal engellerin yakın gelecekte kalkacak olmasıyla beraber çeşitli medyalarda doğrudan karşılaştırmalı reklamlarla karşılaşılacaktır. Karşılaştırmalı reklamların, doğrudan karşılaştırmalı, dolaylı karşılaştırmalı gibi farklı türleri bulunmaktadır. 1900'lü yıllarda kullanılmaya başlandığına rastlanmış ve 1971 yılında da doğrudan karşılaştırmalı reklamın Amerika'da yapılabilmesine yönelik hukuki engeller kaldırılmıştır. Karşılaştırmalı olmayan reklama kıyasla bilgilendirme, ikna etme, rakip markalar arasında daha iyi kıyaslama olanağı sağlama, tüketici lehine rekabeti teşvik etme, ürünlerin geliştirilmesine etkisi olma, pazara yeni girecek firma için pazara giriş bariyerlerini azaltma gibi olumlu yönlerinin yanında, tüketicide kafa karışıklığına neden olması, doğruluk ve tarafsızlığın kaybedilmesi, reklama yönelik daha fazla olumsuz tutumlara neden olması, firmaların aleyhine şiddetli rekabete neden olması, dikkatli kullanılmadığı zaman yasal risklerinin olması gibi olumsuz yönleri de mevcuttur. Olumsuzluklarla karşılaşılmaması için karşılaştırmalı reklamlar kullanılırken dikkat edilmesi gereken noktalar bulunmaktadır

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDIN, İ. (2022). Comparative Advertisings from Marketing Perspective. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3, 899–921. https://ajindex.com/articles/440236

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Abramson, J. (1978). Comparative Advertising; Inoculation Theory; and the Prevention of Attitude Change among Brand Loyal Consumers: A Laboratory Experiment. Doktora Tezi. Louisiana State University. Ash, S. B., & Wee, C.-H. (1983). Comparative Advertising: a Review with Implications for Further Research. Advances in Consumer Research, 10(1), 370-376.
  2. Aybat, O. (2012). Comparative Ads and Their Affective Consequences: The Effect of Schadenfreude on Purchase Likelihood and Attitudes. Doktora Tezi. City University of New York. Barigozzi, F., & Peitz, M. (2004). Comparative Advertising and Competition Policy. International University in Germany Working Paper, No. 19/2004.
  3. Barooah, S. P., & Bhattacharya, S. (2009). Comparative Advertisements: Balancing Consumer Interest Vis-À-Vis IPR Infringement. Indian Journal of Intellectual Property Law, 7(2), 116-128.
  4. Barry, T. E. (1993). Comparative Advertising: What Have We Learned In Two Decades?. Journal Of Advertising Research, March/April, 33(2), 19-29.
  5. Barry, T.E., & Tremblay, R. L. (1975). Comparative Advertising: Perspectives and Issues. Journal of Advertising, 4(4), 15-20.
  6. Beard, F. (2010). Comparative Advertising Wars: An Historical Analysis of Their Causes and Consequences. Journal of Macromarketing, 30(3), 270-286.
  7. Belch, G. E. (1981). An Examination of Comparative and Noncomparative Television Commercials: The Effects of Claim Variation and Repetition on Cognitive Response and Message Acceptance. Journal of Marketing Resecearh, 18(3), 333-349.
  8. Belch, G. E., & Belch, M.A. (2003). Advertising and Promotion. United States of America: The McGraw−Hill Companies. Bodnar, P. M. (2004). Definition of Comparative Advertising. European Integration Studies, 3(1), 25-44.
  9. Bozbel, S. (2010). Adwords Reklamlar Karşılaştırmalı Reklam Teşkil Eder Mi? Avrupa Adalet Divanının Verdiği Kararlar Işığında Bir Değerlendirme. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(18), 97-113.
  10. Brown, S.W., & Jackson, D. W. (1977). Comparative Television Advertising: Examining its Nature and Frequency. Journal of Advertising, 6(4), 15-18.
  11. Chevins, A. C. (1975). A Case for Comparative Advertising. Journal of Advertising, 4(2), 31-36.
  12. Demir Otay, F., & Kızıldağ, Ş. (2011). Sport Sponsorships in Global Growth Strategy: The Case of Turkish Airlines. 10th International Marketing Trends Conference, Paris, France, January 20-22.
  13. Demirdjian, Z. S. (1986). Attitudinal and Behavioral Response to Comparative Advertising: an Experiential Field