SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Projections on the Future of Civil-Military Relations in Argentina and Turkey

Arjantin ve Türkiye’de Asker-Sivil İlişkilerinin Geleceği Üzerine Tahminler

Adem Üstün ÇATALBAŞ
Pages
103–110
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There is no intention in this study to confirm, or refute, civil-military relations theories.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In social sciences, there has always been a scholarly attention on civil-military relations in terms ofdemocratic values.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Several theoretical approaches try to understand/figure out the best civil-militaryestablishment in a democracy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There is no intention in this study to confirm, or refute, civil-military relations theories.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In social sciences, there has always been a scholarly attention on civil-military relations in terms ofdemocratic values. Several theoretical approaches try to understand/figure out the best civil-militaryestablishment in a democracy. Concordance theory suggests that citizenry is an indispensable partof civil-military relations in a given society because military may legitimize its actions in the politicalarena based on the public perception. The main purpose of this study is to figure out that whosupports military in Argentina and Turkey, and what can be the reason to do so. Argentina andTurkey have been through similar experiences in their histories but in this study I focus on thedifferences. There is no intention in this study to confirm, or refute, civil-military relations theories.

Özet

Sosyal bilimlerde demokratik değerler zaviyesinden asker-sivil ilişkilerine yönelik akademik ilgi hep var olagelmiştir. Bir demokratik rejim için en iyi asker-sivil ilişki düzenini anlamaya çalışan çeşitli teorik yaklaşımlar vardır. Uyum Teorisi, vatandaşlığın herhangi bir toplumda asker-sivil ilişkilerinin vazgeçilemez bir parçasını olduğunu ileri sürer çünkü ordu siyasi alandaki eylemlerini kamuoyuna dayanarak meşrulaştırabilir. Bu çalışmanın başlıca amacı Arjantin ve Türkiye’de kim, neden askeri destekliyor sorusuna karşılaştırmalı cevap bulmaktır. Arjantin ve Türkiye kendi tarihleri boyunca benzer tecrübeler yaşamışlar ancak bu çalışma farklılıklara odaklanmaktadır. Bu çalışmada mevcut asker sivil ilişkileri teorileri desteklenmeye yahut çürütülmeye çalışılmamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇATALBAŞ, A. Ü. (2022). Projections on the Future of Civil-Military Relations in Argentina and Turkey. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 103–110. https://ajindex.com/articles/440191

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Alkan, A. T. (2013). Ikinci Mesrutiyet Doneminde Ordu ve Siyaset (Military and Politics in the second Contitutionalism). Istanbul: Otuken Nesriyat. Arnoso-Martinez, M., Arnoso-Martinez, A., & Perez-Sales, P. (2012). Social representations of the past: Argentine military dictatorship in collective memory. Revista De Psicologia Social, 27(3), 259–272.
  2. Balci, A. (2010). A Trajectory of Competing Narratives: 3 For further information about Turkey’s recent confrontation to its past and military tutelage see: (Balci, 2010; Cizre & Walker, 2010). The Turkish Media Debate Ergenekon. Mediterranean Quarterly, 21(1), 76–100. https://doi.org/10.1215/10474552-2009-035
  3. Cizre, U., & Walker, J. (2010). Conceiving the New Turkey After Ergenekon. The International Spectator: Italian Journal of International Affairs, 45(1), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932721003661640
  4. Cwik, C. (2009). The Other Immigration to Argentina: the Case of Adolf Eichman. Clio America, 3(5), 85–103.
  5. Demirel, T. (2005). Lessons of Military Regimes and Democracy: The Turkish Case in a Comparative Perspective. Armed Forces & Society, 31(2), 245– 271. Fleckenstein, B. (2000). Germany: Forerunner of a Post national Military. In D. R. Moskos Charles C., Williams, John Allen, Segal (Ed.), The Postmodern Military (pp. 80–100). New York: Oxford University Press.
  6. Goni, U. (2002). The Real Odessa: How Peron Brought the Nazi War Criminals to Argentina. London: Granta Books. Heper, M., & Guney, A. (2000). The military and the consolidation of democracy: The recent Turkish experience. Armed Forces & Society, 26(4), 635–657. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X0002600407
  7. Hunter, W. (1998). Negotiating Civil-Military Relations in Post-Authoritarian Argentina and Chile. International Studies Quarterly, 42(2), 295–317. https://doi.org/papers2://publication/uuid/270D4400- 9E85-4071-AFCA-85D03987EF67 Huntington, S. P. (1957). The Soldier and the State: The Theory and Politics of Civil-Military Relations. America. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333977972
  8. Huntington, S. P. (1997). The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order by Samuel P. Huntington:The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 475–477. https://doi.org/10.1086/231221
  9. Hur, A. (2014). Oteki Tarih: Kemalist Devrimler ve Isyanlar (The Other History: Kemalist Revolutions and Resurrections). Istanbul: Profil yayincilik. Ihrig, S. (2014). Ataturk in the Nazi Imaginat