SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 6

Use of the Open Government Implementation in a More Democratic Management: Swedish Example

Daha Demokratik Bir Yönetimin İnşasında Açık Hükümet Uygulamasının Kullanılması: İsveç Örneği

Ümmühan KAYGISIZ
Pages
769–778
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In general, it is aimed to make clear the concept of open government in the article.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The open government concept promises a broader understanding of the e-government as the basis for transforming governments into more open, participatory and collaborative.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The open government framework is used as a way to define the value generated when the interaction between government and citizens becomes more transparent, participatory and collaborative, ie, more democratic.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In general, it is aimed to make clear the concept of open government in the article.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The open government concept promises a broader understanding of the e-government as the basis for transforming governments into more open, participatory and collaborative. It is necessary to assess the open government in the context of e-government and in the context of the future of the public administration. Today, e-democracy and e-government combine democratic practices activated by emerging technology into administrative institutions. The open government framework is used as a way to define the value generated when the interaction between government and citizens becomes more transparent, participatory and collaborative, ie, more democratic. Open government can be seen as a way of strengthening democracy through greater transparency, participation and cooperation. In this article, the current open government literature is examined to reveal a complementary definition of the open government, a conceptual framework is established in the light of the obtained data, and Sweden is examined as an example of an open government. In general, it is aimed to make clear the concept of open government in the article.

Özet

Açık hükümet kavramı hükümetleri daha açık, katılımcı ve işbirlikçi hale dönüştürmek için temel olarak e-hükümetten daha geniş bir anlayış sözü vermektedir. Açık hükümeti, e-devlet bağlamında ve kamu idaresinin geleceği bağlamında değerlendirmek gereklidir. Günümüzde e-demokrasi ve e-hükümet, gelişmekte olan teknoloji tarafından etkinleştirilen demokratik uygulamaları idari kurumlarda birleştirmektedir. Hükümet ve vatandaşlar arasındaki etkileşim daha şeffaf, katılımcı ve işbirlikçi yani daha demokratik hale geldiğinde üretilen değeri tanımlamak için bir yöntem olarak açık hükümet çerçevesi kullanılmaktadır. Açık hükümet, daha fazla şeffaflık, katılım ve işbirliği vasıtasıyla demokrasiyi güçlendirmenin bir yolu olarak görülebilir. Bu makalede, açık hükümetin bütünleyici bir tanımını ortaya koymak için mevcut açık hükümet literatürü incelenmiş, elde edilen veriler ışığında kavramsal çerçeve oluşturulmuş ve bir açık hükümet örneği olarak İsveç irdelenmiştir. Genel olarak, makalede açık hükümet konseptinin net bir şekilde anlaşılması amaçlanmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYGISIZ, Ü. (2022). Use of the Open Government Implementation in a More Democratic Management: Swedish Example. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 6, 769–778. https://ajindex.com/articles/440168

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Bertelsen, D.A. (1992). Media Form And Government: Democracy As An Archetypal Image In The Electronic Age. Communication Quarterly, 40, 4, 325–337.
  2. Blanton, T. (2002). The World’s Right To Know. Foreign Policy, 131, 50–58.
  3. Casey, M., & Stephens, M. (2007). A Road Map To Transparency. Library Journal, 132(20), 37-39.
  4. Eryılmaz, B. (2012) Kamu Yönetimi. İzmit: Umuttepe Yayınları.
  5. Ferranti, D.M.D. (2009). How to improve governance: a new framework for analysis and action. Brookings Institution Press.
  6. Fung, A. (2010). Open Government and Open Society. In: D. Lathrop and L. Ruma (eds.), Open Government: Collaboration, Transparency, and Participation in Practice. O'Reilly Media, Inc., 105-113.
  7. Geiger, C. P., & Von Lucke, J. (2012). Open government and (linked)(open)(government)(data). JeDEM-eJournal of eDemocracy and open Government, 4(2), 265-278. Grønbech-Jensen, C. (1998). The Scandinavian tradition of open government and the European Union: problems of compatibility?. Journal of European Public Policy, 5(1), 185-199.
  8. Habermas, J. (1991). The structural transformation of the public sphere: an inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. MIT Press.
  9. Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. London, England: Polity Hansson, K., Belkacem, K., & Ekenberg, L. (2015). Open government and democracy: A research review. Social Science Computer Review, 33(5), 540-555.
  10. Heckmann, D. (2011). Open government—Retooling democracy for the 21st century. Proceedings of the 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii. Kassen, M. (2017). Understanding transparency of government from a Nordic perspective: open government and open data movement as a multidimensional collaborative phenomenon in Sweden. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 20(4), 236-275.
  11. McGuire, M. (2006). Collaborative public management: Assessing what we know and how we know it. Public administration review, 66, 33-43. Blomqvist P., & Bergman P. (2010). Regionalisation Nordic Style: Will Regions in Sweden Threaten Local Democracy?. Local Government Studies, 36(1), 43-74.
  12. Meijer, A. J., Curtin, D., & Hillebrandt, M. (2012). Open government: connecting vision and voice. International review of administrative sciences, 78(1), 10-29.
  13. Dahl, R. A., & Tufte. E. (1973). Size and Democracy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  14. Mergel, I. (2015). Opening government: Designing open innovation processes to collaborate with extern