Journals / Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 6

Family and Entrepreneurship relationship within Context of Theories of Sociology

Sosyolojik Kuramlar Çerçevesinde Aile ve Girişimcilik İlişkisi

Pages
869–878
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study entrepreneurial behavior is tried to be defined up to the family approaches of theoritical sociology perpespectives.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The behaviors of individual who has a psychological structure, could not be explained independent of social contexts.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Explaining entrepreneurship via family concept which is social institute can be seen as a requirement.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study entrepreneurial behavior is tried to be defined up to the family approaches of theoritical sociology perpespectives.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The behaviors of individual who has a psychological structure, could not be explained independent of social contexts. Explaining entrepreneurship via family concept which is social institute can be seen as a requirement. Considering that traits and states constitute personality features and factors as family, school, etc. effect state factor it can be said that sociology with its components has an effect on entrepreneurship. While revealing the effect of family on entrepreneuership studying within sociological approaches seems as a necessity. Sociological approaches can be defined as methodoligical and theoretical approaches. Methodological approaches can be defined as critical, interpretive and positivist approaches. Symbolic interactionism, structural-functionalism modernism, and postmodernism are the types of theoritical sociological approaches. In this study entrepreneurial behavior is tried to be defined up to the family approaches of theoritical sociology perpespectives.

Özet

Psikolojik bir varlık olan bireyin davranışlarınıniçinde bulunduğu sosyal bağlamdan soyutlanarak açıklanması imkânsız gibigörülmektedir. Girişimcilik olgusunun sosyal bir kurum olan aile üzerindenyorumlanması bir gereklilik olarak görülebilir. Kişilik özelliklerinin genetikve çevresel faktörlerin bileşimi olduğu düşünülürse çevresel faktörlerin sosyalyapı olduğu, sosyal yapının ise aile, okul, din vb. bileşenlerden oluştuğu dagözönüne alınırsa sosyolojinin girişimcilik üzerinde birçok bileşeni yoluylaetkisinin olabileceği değerlendirilebilir. Aile kurumunun girişimcilikteki rolünü ortaya koyarken öncelikleyaklaşımlardan yararlanılması sosyolojik çalışmalar için bir gerekliliktir.Yaklaşımlar da kendi içinde metodolojik ve kuramsal yaklaşımlar olarakayrılmaktadır. Metodolojik yaklaşımlara örnek olarak eleştirel, yorumlayıcı vepozitivist yaklaşımlar örnek verilebilir. Kuramsal yaklaşımlara ise semboliketkileşimcilik, yapısal- işlevselcilik, modernizm, çatışmacılık, feminizm vepostmodernizm kuramları örnek verilebilir. Bu çalışmada girişimsel davranış,sosyolojinin kuramsal yaklaşımlarının aileye bakışı çerçevesinde tanımlanmayaçalışılmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YENER, S. (2022). Family and Entrepreneurship relationship within Context of Theories of Sociology. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 6, 869–878. https://ajindex.com/articles/440145

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Abaho, E., Salim, I.S., ve Akısımıre, R. (2013). Culture; is it relevant in the antecedence of entrepreneurial values? Global Advanced Research Journal of Management and Business Studies, 2 (3), 189-198.
  2. Aldrich, H ve Cliff, J. (2003). The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: toward a family embeddedness perspective”, Journal of Business Venturing, 2003, 573 – 596. Apple, M. (1995). Education and power (second edition). Nueva York: Routledge. Bellu, R. R. (1993). Task Role Motivation and Attributional Style as Predictors of Entrepreneurial Performance: Female Sample Findings. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 5,331–344.
  3. Bird, M. (2014). The impact of Family on Entrepreneurial Outcomes.Stockholm School of Economics, Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, 2014.
  4. Blumer, H. (1962). Society as symbolic interaction. In: Rose AM (ed.) Human Behavior and Social Processes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.,179–92.
  5. Blumer, H.(1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall). Brittan, S. (1973).
  6. Is there an economic consensus, MacMillan, 1973. Burt. S. 1992. The social structure of competition. Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action, 57: 91. Burmeister, P. (2003). Breaking the code: What to present to venture capitalists. Strategic Finance; Montvale, 84 (9), 36-39.
  7. Carter, M.J. ve Fuller, C. (2015).
  8. Symbolic Interactionism, Sociopedia.isa, DOI: 10.1177/205684601561. Dscua-Cruz, A. D., Howorth, C., ve Hamilton, E. (2013). Intrafamily entrepreneurship: The formation and membership of family entrepreneurial teams. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(1): 17-46.
  9. Doepke, M. ve Zilibotti,, F. (2013). Culture, entrepreneurship, and growth. Handbook of Ecoomic Growth.2013.
  10. Douglas, M. (1973). Natural Symbols: Explorations in Cosmology (2nd ed.; New York: Random House, 1973.
  11. Dunn, T. ve Holtz-Eakin. (2000)
  12. Financial Capital, Human Capital and the Transition to Self-Employment: Evidence from Intergenerational Links,’’ Journal of Labor Economics 18, 282–305.
  13. Engels, F. (1884). The origin of the family, private property and the state. (Hottingen-Zurich). Fagenson, E. A. ve Marcus, E. (1991). Perceptions of the Sex-Role Stereotypic Characteristics of Entrepreneurs: Women’s Evaluations, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 15, 33–47.
  14. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings. New York: Pantheon Books. Freedman, J. ve Combs, G. (1996). Narrative therapy: The social construction of