Journals / Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

The Causality Between Current Account Deficit and Economic Growth: The Case of Visegrad Four

Cari Açık ve Ekonomik Büyüme Arasındaki Nedensellik İlişkisi: Visegrad Dörtlüsü Örneği

Pages
35–40
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the empirical results, in the long run there is one-way causality from current account deficit to the economic growth in Visegrad Four.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to determine the causality between current account deficit and economic growth for Visegrad Four (Poland, Czech Republic, Hungary, Slovakia).
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this context, an empirical model was developed in the scope of the panel data analysis using annual data for the period of 1993-2015.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the empirical results, in the long run there is one-way causality from current account deficit to the economic growth in Visegrad Four.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the causality between current account deficit and economic growth for Visegrad Four (Poland, Czech Republic, Hungary, Slovakia). In this context, an empirical model was developed in the scope of the panel data analysis using annual data for the period of 1993-2015. Firstly, heterogeneity of the variables was investigated using the Delta test, and then cross section dependency and unit root notions were examined respectively by the CDlm test and Hadri-Kurozumi (2012) test. After the existence of the cointegration relationship between the series was proved by using the Durbin H cointegration test, Dumitrescu-Hurlin panel causality test was applied. According to the empirical results, in the long run there is one-way causality from current account deficit to the economic growth in Visegrad Four.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı cari hesap açığı ve ekonomik büyüme değişkenleri arasındaki ilişkiyiVisegrad Dörtlüsü olarak adlandırılan Polonya, Çek Cumhuriyeti, Macaristan ve Slovakya içinbelirlemektir. Bu bağlamda oluşturulan ampirik model, 1993-2015 yıllarını kapsayan bir dönemiçin panel veri analizi ile test edilmiştir. Öncelikle değişkenlerin heterojenliği ve yatay kesitbağımlılığı sırasıyla Delta ve CDlm testleri ile araştırılmış ve daha sonra Hadri-Kurozumi (2012)birim kök testi yapılmıştır. Değişkenler arasındaki eş-bütünleşme ilişkisinin varlığı Durbin-H testiile ispat edildikten sonra Dumetrescu-Hurlin (2012) nedensellik testi yapılmıştır. Uygulamabulgularına göre uzun dönemde, seçili Visegrad ülkelerinde cari hesap açığından ekonomikbüyümeye doğru tek yönlü bir nedensellik ilişkisi mevcuttur.

🔖

Cite This Article

SÖNMEZ, F. E., SAĞLAM, Y. (2022). The Causality Between Current Account Deficit and Economic Growth: The Case of Visegrad Four. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 35–40. https://ajindex.com/articles/439995

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Akbaş, Y. E., Lebe, F. & Uluyol, O. (2014). Analyzing the relationship among the GDP - Current account deficit and short term capital flows: The case of emerging markets, Journal of Management and Economics, 21(2), 293-303.
  2. Akçay, A. & Erataş, F. (2012). Cari açık ve ekonomik büyüme ilişkisinin panel nedensellik analizi ekseninde değerlendirilmesi,http://teacongress.org/papers2012/AKC AY-ERATAS.pdf, 08.04.2016.
  3. Arellano, M. (2003). Panel data econometrics advanced texts in econometrics, Great Britain: Oxford University Press.
  4. Baltagi, B. H., (2013).
  5. Econometric analysis of panel data, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Bilcik, V. & Strazay, T. (2006). Functioning of Visegrad four before and after the entry of its members into the EU, Research center SFPA. [cit.1.2.2011]. http://www.sfpa.sk/sk/, 11.02.2017.
  6. Breusch, T. & Pagan, A. (1980), “The Lagrange Multiplier Test and its Application to Model Specifications in Econometrics”, Reviews of Economics Studies, 47, 239- 253. Brazova, V.K., Matczak, P. & Takacs, V. (2013). Regional organization study: Visegrad group, Analysis of Civil Security Systems in Europe, Adam Mickiewicz University. Choi, I. (1993). Improving empirical size of the KPSS Test of stationary. Online Access http://hompi.sogang.ac.kr/inchoi/workingpaper/in_choijetem-_revision_2.pdf, 11.02.2017.
  7. De Mello, L., Padoan, P. C. & Rousová, L. (2011). The growth effect of current-account reversals, http://www.voxeu.org/article/growth-effect-currentaccount-reversals, 08.04.2016.
  8. Dumetriscu, E.I. & Hurlin, C. (2012). Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels,Economic Modelling, 29(4), 1450-1460.
  9. Edwards, S. (2002). Does the current account matter?, Preventing Currency Crises in Emerging Markets, Sebastian Edwards and Jeffrey A. Frankel, (editors), The University of Chicago Press.
  10. Edwards, S. (2004). Financial ppenness: Sudden stops and current account reversals”, NBER Working Paper, No: 10277. Güloğlu, B. & İspir, S. (2009). Yeni gelişmeler ışığında Türkiye’de satın alma gücü paritesi önsavının panel birim kök sınaması, Pamukkale University CASE-Economics Department Publishings. Güloğlu, B. & İvrendi, M., (2010). Output fluctuations: Transitory or permanent? The case of Latin America, Applied Economics Letters, 17, 381-386.
  11. Hadri, K. & Kurozumi, E. (2012). A simple panel stationarity test in the presence of serial correlation and a common factor, Economics Letter, 115, 31-34.
  12. Hepaktan, E. & Çınar, S. (2012). OECD ülkelerinde büyümecari işle