Journals / Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

Biomass Energy Consumption, Economic Growth and CO2 Emission in G-20 Countries

G-20 Ülkelerinde Biyokütle Enerji Tüketimi, Ekonomik Büyüme ve CO2 Emisyonu

Pages
347–353
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, a bidirectional causal relationship exists between biomassenergy consumption and CO2 emissions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study investigates the relationship between biomass energy consumption, economic growth,carbon dioxide emissions, and natural resource depletion in G-20 countries from 1992 to 2013.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The results reveal that biomassenergy consumption, economic growth, CO2 emissions, and natural resource depletion arecointegrated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, a bidirectional causal relationship exists between biomassenergy consumption and CO2 emissions.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between biomass energy consumption, economic growth,carbon dioxide emissions, and natural resource depletion in G-20 countries from 1992 to 2013. Forthis purpose, we used panel unit root tests, the panel cointegration test, the panel fully modified OLS(FMOLS) method, and the panel VECM Granger causality method. The results reveal that biomassenergy consumption, economic growth, CO2 emissions, and natural resource depletion arecointegrated. In addition, increasing biomass energy consumption leads to increased economicgrowth. On the other hand, the increase in biomass energy consumption reduces CO2 emissions.Moreover, a unidirectional causality exists from biomass energy consumption to GDP growth,supporting the growth hypothesis. Finally, a bidirectional causal relationship exists between biomassenergy consumption and CO2 emissions.

Özet

Bu çalışmada 1992-2013 yılları arasında G-20 ülkelerinde biyokütle enerjisi tüketimi, ekonomik büyüme, karbondioksit emisyonu ve doğal kaynak tükenmesi arasındaki ilişki incelenmektedir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda, panel birim kök, panel eşbütünleşme, panel FMOLS (fully modifies OLS) ve panel VECM Granger nedensellik yöntemleri kullanılmıştır. Sonuçlar, biyokütle enerjisi tüketiminin, ekonomik büyümenin, CO2 emisyonunun ve doğal kaynak tükenmesinin eşbütünleşik olduğunu göstermektedir. Ayrıca, biyokütle enerjisi tüketiminin artması ekonomik büyümenin artmasına yol açmaktadır. Öte yandan, biyokütle enerji tüketimindeki artış CO2 emisyonlarını azaltmaktadır. Ayrıca, büyüme hipotezini destekleyen biyokütle enerji tüketiminden GSYH büyümesine doğru tek yönlü bir nedensellik vardır. Son olarak, biyokütle enerji tüketimi ile CO2 emisyonu arasında iki yönlü bir nedensellik ilişkisi vardır.

🔖

Cite This Article

DASTEK, M. A., OKUMUŞ, İ. (2022). Biomass Energy Consumption, Economic Growth and CO2 Emission in G-20 Countries. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 347–353. https://ajindex.com/articles/439992

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Apergis, N., & Payne, J. E. (2010). Renewable energy consumption and growth in Eurasia. Energy Economics, 32(6), 1392-1397.
  2. Apergis, N., & Payne, J. E. (2010). Renewable energy consumption and economic growth: evidence from a panel of OECD countries. Energy policy, 38(1), 656-660.
  3. Apergis, N., & Payne, J. E. (2011). Renewable and nonrenewable electricity consumption–growth nexus: evidence from emerging market economies. Applied Energy, 88(12), 5226-5230.
  4. Apergis, N., & Payne, J. E. (2014). Renewable energy, output, CO 2 emissions, and fossil fuel prices in Central America: evidence from a nonlinear panel smooth transition vector error correction model. Energy Economics, 42, 226-232.
  5. Apergis, N., & Payne, J. E. (2015). Renewable energy, output, carbon dioxide emissions, and oil prices: evidence from South America. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 10(3), 281-287.
  6. Apergis, N., Payne, J. E., Menyah, K., & Wolde-Rufael, Y. (2010). On the causal dynamics between emissions, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and economic growth. Ecological Economics, 69(11), 2255-2260.
  7. Aydın, C., & Esen, Ö. (2017). Does Too Much Energy Consumption Harm Economic Growth for Turkish Republics in The Transition Process? New Evidence on Threshold Effects. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 7(2), 34-43.
  8. Aydın, F. F. (2018). D-8 Ülkelerinde Biyokütle Enerjisi Tüketimi ile Ekonomik Büyüme Arasındaki İlişki. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6(3), 371-377.
  9. Ben Jebli, M., Ben Youssef, S., & Apergis, N. (2014). The dynamic linkage between CO2 emissions, economic growth, renewable energy consumption, number of tourist arrivals and trade. Bildirici, M. E. (2012). The relationship between economic growth and biomass energy consumption. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 4(2), 023113. Bildirici, M. E. (2013). Economic growth and biomass energy. Biomass and bioenergy, 50, 19-24.
  10. Bildirici, M. E. (2014). Relationship between biomass energy and economic growth in transition countries: panel ARDL approach. Gcb Bioenergy, 6(6), 717-726.
  11. Bildirici, M. E., & Özaksoy, F. (2013). The relationship between economic growth and biomass energy consumption in some European countries. Journal of renewable and sustainable energy, 5(2), 023141. Bildirici, M., & Ersin, Ö. (2015). An Investigation of the Relationship between the biomass energy consumption, economic growth and oil prices. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 210, 203-2