SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

A Transition to Openness Paradigm in Innovation: Examples Of Open Innovatıon From Turkey

İnovasyonda Açıklık Paradigmasına Geçiş: Türkiye’den Açık İnovasyon Örnekleri

Zeynep EZANOĞLU
İbrahim DAĞLI
Pages
793–802
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Consequently clear that innovation is inevitable for companies and it seems that many companies operating in Turkey adopt open innovation model.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The cost of R&D units working with closed innovation model has increased over time.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Nowadays, many of these units have started to prefer open innovation model.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Consequently clear that innovation is inevitable for companies and it seems that many companies operating in Turkey adopt open innovation model.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The cost of R&D units working with closed innovation model has increased over time. Nowadays, many of these units have started to prefer open innovation model. In this study, this model defined as “Innovation of Innovation” by Chesbrough is examined. In addition, the process of evolving the concept of closed innovation towards open innovation and the comparison of them are included. It is easy to find many studies dealing with examples of foreign companies in open innovation, but not in Turkish companies. This study discussed the successful examples of the companies which apply the open innovation model in Turkey. Consequently clear that innovation is inevitable for companies and it seems that many companies operating in Turkey adopt open innovation model.

Özet

Kapalı inovasyon modeli ile çalışan Ar-Ge birimlerinin zamanla maliyeti artmıştır. Günümüzde bubirimlerin birçoğu açık inovasyon modelini tercih etmeye başlamıştır. Bu çalışmada literatürdeChesbrough tarafından “İnovasyonun inovasyonu” olarak tanımlanan bu model incelenmiştir.Ayrıca çalışmada kapalı inovasyon anlayışının açık inovasyona doğru evrilme süreci ve bu ikimodelin karşılaştırılmasına yer verilmiştir. Literatürde, dünyadan örnekleri ele alan birçok çalışmabulunmasına karşın Türkiye’den örnekleri ele alan bir çalışmaya rastlanmamıştır. Bu çalışmanınönemi, Türkiye’de açık inovasyon modelini uygulayan firmaların başarılarının ele alınmış olmasıdır.Bu şekilde, diğer firmalarda açık inovasyonun önemi açısından bir farkındalık oluşturulması vebaşarılı sonuçların sunularak literatüre katkı sağlanması amaçlanmıştır. Sonuç olarak açıkinovasyonun günümüz şartlarında firmalar için kaçınılmaz olduğu ve Türkiye’de faaliyette bulunanbirçok firmanın açık inovasyon modelini benimsediği görülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

EZANOĞLU, Z., DAĞLI, İ. (2022). A Transition to Openness Paradigm in Innovation: Examples Of Open Innovatıon From Turkey. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 793–802. https://ajindex.com/articles/439935

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Arçelik A.Ş., (2019). (Erişim: 3/8/2019), http://www. arcelikas.com/sayfa/69/Teknoloji ve Yenilikçilik Aselsan, (2019). (Erişim:15/7/2019), https://www.aselsan. com.tr/tr/inovasyon/universite-%C4%B1sbirlikleri Balcı, B., (2019). (Erişim: 21/8/2019), http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/ekonomi/acik-inovasyon-ile-yatiriminikatladi-25210730 Campaign, (2017). (Erişim:10/6/2019), https://www. campaigntr.com/vestelden-iletisimde-de-inovasyon/ Cankı, B., (2019). (Erişim: 16/6/2019), https://www. donanimhaber.com/Ford-ve-Vodafone-Park-YeriKilavuzu-isimli-yeni-bir-teknoloji-test-ediyor-- 112203 Chan, W. C., Chen, P. C., Hung, S. W., Tsai, M. C., & Chen, T. K. (2017). Open Innovation and Team Leaders’ Innovation Traits. Engineering Management Journal, 29(2), 87-98.
  2. Chesbrough, H., (2003a).
  3. The era of open innovation, MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(3), 35-41.
  4. Chesbrough, H., (2003b). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Harvard Business School Press,
  5. Boston, MA. Chesbrough, H. (2004).
  6. Managing open innovation, ResearchTechnology Management, 47(1), 23-26.
  7. Chesbrough, H. (2012). Open innovation: Where we've been and where we're going. Research-Technology Management, 55(4), 20-27.
  8. Chesbrough, H. (2017). The Future of Open Innovation: The future of open innovation is more extensive, more collaborative, and more engaged with a wider variety of participants. Research-Technology Management, 60(1), 35-38.
  9. Chesbrough, H., & Crowther, A. K. (2006). Beyond high tech: early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R&D Management, 36(3), 229-236.
  10. Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open Innovation: A new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation. In: Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke,W., West, J. (Eds.), Open Innovation: Researching a new paradigm. (1 -15). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  11. Chesbrough, H., & Bogers, M., (2014). Explicating open innovation: clarifying an emerging paradigm for understanding innovation. In: Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke,W., West, J. (Eds.), New Frontiers in Open Innovation (3-28). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  12. Chiaroni, D., Chiesa, V., & Frattini, F. (2010). Unravelling the process from Closed to Open Innovation: evidence from mature, asset‐intensive industries. R&D Management, 40(3), 222-245.
  13. Christiansen, J. K., Gasparin, M., & Varnes, C. J. (2013). Improving design with open innovation: A flexible management technology. Research-Technology Management, 56(2), 36-44.
  14. Clausen, T., & Rasmussen, E. (2011). Open innova