Journals / Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler

Political Consequences of Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001 and November 13, 2015: War on Terrorism

11 Eylül 2001 ve 13 Kasım 2015 Terör Saldırılarının Siyasete Etkileri: ABD ve Fransa’nın Terörle Savaş Yaklaşımı

Pages
205–219
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results, war on terrorism approach implemented by the USA and France in war on terrorism shows four common trends: the tendency to make the regulations made after terrorist attacks a security issue, aim to fight jihadist Islam, not Islam,the prominence of law enforcement and military forces in national and foreign policy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this research is to analyze the effects of political consequences of terror by making a comparative analysis of September 11, 2001 in the USA and on the attacks of November 13, 2015 in France.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Bush and François Hollande were analyzed and 5 themes were created as war on terrorism, power of the state and nation, capacity and evil of the enemy, international cooperation, military and administrative regulations, and categories were determined for each theme.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results, war on terrorism approach implemented by the USA and France in war on terrorism shows four common trends: the tendency to make the regulations made after terrorist attacks a security issue, aim to fight jihadist Islam, not Islam,the prominence of law enforcement and military forces in national and foreign policy.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2001 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to analyze the effects of political consequences of terror by making a comparative analysis of September 11, 2001 in the USA and on the attacks of November 13, 2015 in France. In the study, content analysis technique was used by applying qualitative research method. After terrorist attacks, the speech texts of George W. Bush and François Hollande were analyzed and 5 themes were created as war on terrorism, power of the state and nation, capacity and evil of the enemy, international cooperation, military and administrative regulations, and categories were determined for each theme. According to the results, war on terrorism approach implemented by the USA and France in war on terrorism shows four common trends: the tendency to make the regulations made after terrorist attacks a security issue, aim to fight jihadist Islam, not Islam,the prominence of law enforcement and military forces in national and foreign policy.

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı ABD’de 11 Eylül 2001 yılında ve Fransa’da 13 Kasım 2015 yılında gerçekleşen terör saldırıları ardından uygulanan terörle savaş yaklaşımının karşılaştırmalı analizini yapmaktır. Çalışmada nitel araştırma yöntemi uygulanarak içerik analizi tekniği kullanılmıştır. Terör saldırıları sonrasında George W. Bush ve François Hollande’in yaptıkları konuşma metinleri analiz edilerek terörle savaş, devletin ve ulusun gücü, düşmanın kapasitesi ve kötülüğü, uluslararası iş birliği, askeri ve idari düzenlemeler olarak 5 tema oluşturulmuş ve her bir tema için kategoriler belirlenmiştir. Elde edilen bulgulara göre, ABD ve Fransa’nın terörle mücadelede uyguladıkları terörle savaş yaklaşımı temelde dört ortak eğilim göstermektedir: terör saldırıları sonrasında yapılan düzenlemelerin güvenlik konusu haline getirme eğilimi, İslam’la değil cihatçı İslam’la mücadele etmeyi hedefledikleri, ulusal ve dış politikada kolluk ve askeri kuvvetlerin ön plana çıkması.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALTINTAŞ, A. Y. (2022). Political Consequences of Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001 and November 13, 2015: War on Terrorism. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler, 205–219. https://ajindex.com/articles/439929

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. 11 Komisyon Raporu. (tarih yok). Tthe 9/11 Commission Report Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States.National Commission on Terrorist Attacks. Abdo, M. (2015, Erişim Tarihi: 29 Haziran 2020). A Critical Discourse Analysis of George W. Bush's Speech An Appeal to Muslims: Address to the United Nations.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327270369_A_Critical_Discourse_Analysis_of_George_W_Bush%27s_Speech_An_Appeal_to_Muslims_Address_to_the_United_Nations adresinden alındı d'Abadie, D. S., (2003), from 11/9 to 9/11:Contunity or Change in International Politics,Outone-Inverno, pp.123-134
  2. Ballesteros, A., 2018,
  3. Counter-Terrorism Efforts in Spain, Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses, Vol. 10, No. 11, pp.9-13 BBC, (2016), https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-35924701 Son Erişim Tarihi: 06.10.2020
  4. Beauchamps, M. (2020, Haziran 21). Denaturalisation, ‘Terrorism’ and National Identity in France.https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/45345526/explosivepolitics.com-Denaturalisation_Terrorism_and_National_Identity_in_France.pdf?1462367173=&response-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename%3DDenaturalisation_Terrorism_and_National.pdf&Expires=159276425 adresinden alındı Berschinski, R. G. (2007). Afrıcom’s Dılemma: The “Global War on Terrorısm,” “Capacıty Buıldıng,” Humanıtarıanısm, and The Future ff U.S. Securıty Polıcy in Afrıca.https://www.peacepalacelibrary.nl/ebooks/files/37121954X.pdf,: Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Beshara, R. K. (2018). A critical discourse analysis of George W. Bush’s ‘War on Terror’ speech: the rhetoric of (counter)terrorism and the logic of Islamophobia. Journal of Language and Discrimination, Vol.2, No.1, 85-122.
  5. Blakeley, R. (2017). British torture in the ‘war on terror’. European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 23, No. 2, DOI: 10.1177/1354066116653455, 243–266.
  6. Blanchard, M. C. and Humud, E. C., 2018,
  7. The Islamic Satate and U.S Policy, Congressiona Research Service, rapor Boutin, B. (2016). The Use and Abuse of Administrative Measures against FTFs in France.ICCT The Hague. Bush, G. W. (2001, Eylül 20). Text: President Bush Addressesthe Nation.https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/nation/specials/attacked/transcripts/bushaddress_092001.html adresinden alındı Brisard, J-C. 2015, The Paris Attacks and the Evolving Islamic State Threat to France, CTCSENTİNEL, Vol.8, No.11 Bymann, D.L.,2011, The History of Al-Qaeda https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/the-history-of-al-qaed