Journals / Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

The Effects of Attributional Style on Job Satisfaction, Job Performance, and Turnover Intention: The Case of Hotel Employees

Atfetme Stillerinin İş Tatmini, İş Performansı ve İşten Ayrılma Niyetleri Üzerindeki Etkisi: Otel İşletmesi Çalışanları Örneği

Pages
523–531
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of SEM analysis, a positive attributional style positivelyaffects job satisfaction and job performance, but a significant effect on turnover intention could not bedetermined.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Employees’ assessment of success and failure situations and arguments affects their behavior and workoutcomes at work.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Individuals use two attribution styles, positive and negative, in these evaluations.The purpose of the study is to examine the effects of attribution styles on job satisfaction, jobperformance, and turnover intention among five-star hotel business employees in Belek/Antalya,Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results of SEM analysis, a positive attributional style positivelyaffects job satisfaction and job performance, but a significant effect on turnover intention could not bedetermined.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Employees’ assessment of success and failure situations and arguments affects their behavior and workoutcomes at work. Individuals use two attribution styles, positive and negative, in these evaluations.The purpose of the study is to examine the effects of attribution styles on job satisfaction, jobperformance, and turnover intention among five-star hotel business employees in Belek/Antalya,Turkey. Data is collected using a questionnaire, and 249 applicable questionnaires are gathered at theend of the study. According to the results of SEM analysis, a positive attributional style positivelyaffects job satisfaction and job performance, but a significant effect on turnover intention could not bedetermined. On the other hand, a negative attributional style has no effect on job satisfaction, jobperformance, and turnover intention.

Özet

İşgörenlerin karşılaştıkları başarı ve başarısızlık durumlarını değerlendirmeleri ve bunları açıklamakta kullandıkları argümanlar, onların iş yerindeki davranışlarını ve iş çıktılarını etkilemektedir. Bireyler bu değerlendirmelerde pozitif ve negatif olmak üzere iki atfetme stili kullanmaktadırlar. Bu çalışmanın amacı atfetme stillerinin, işgörenlerin iş tatmini, iş performansı ve işten ayrılma niyetine etkilerini incelemektir. Çalışmanın örneklemi Antalya Belek’teki beş yıldızlı otel çalışanları oluşturmaktadır. Veriler anket yöntemiyle toplanmıştır ve çalışma sonunda toplam 249 kullanılabilir anket elde edilmiştir. Yapılan SEM analizi sonuçlarına göre; pozitif atfetme stilinin iş tatmini ve iş performansını pozitif etkilediği tespit edilmiştir. İşten ayrılma niyeti üzerine ise anlamlı bir etkisi tespit edilememiştir. Negatif atfetme stilinin ise iş tatmini, iş performansı ve işten ayrılma niyetini etkilemediği tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KALE, E., AKNAR, A. (2022). The Effects of Attributional Style on Job Satisfaction, Job Performance, and Turnover Intention: The Case of Hotel Employees. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 523–531. https://ajindex.com/articles/439922

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Abramson, L. Y., Seligman, M. E. P., & Teasdale, J. D. (1978). Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87(1), 49–74.
  2. Ağaoğlu, O. K. (1992). İşgücünü Verimli Kullanma Tekniklerinin Turizm Sektörüne Uygulanması. Ankara:Milli Prodüktivite Merkezi Yayınları: 457. Altunışık, R., Çoşkun, R., Bayraktaroğlu, S. & Yıldırım, E. (2012). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri SPSS Uygulamalı (7. Baskı) Sakarya: Sakarya Kitabevi Antonioni, D., & Park, H. (2001). The effects of personality similarity on peer ratings of contextual work behaviors. Personnel Psychology, 54(2), 331 –360. Babin, B. J., & Boles, J. S. (1996). The effects of perceived co-worker involvement and supervisor support on service provider role stress, performance and job satisfaction. Journal of Retailing, 72(1), 57–75.
  3. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94.
  4. Baş, T., & Ardic, K. (2002). A comparison of job satisfaction between public and private university academicians in Turkey. METU Studies in Development, 29(1 –2), 27–46. Betuyab Belek Turizm Yatırımcıları Ortak Girişimi http://www.betuyab.com.tr/tr/hotels (Erişim, 18.03.2017)
  5. Brislin, R.W., W. J. Lonner ve R.M. Thorndike (1973),
  6. Cross-Cultural Research Methods, New York: John Wiley &Sons Production. Ciarrochi, J., Heaven, P. C. L., & Davies, F. (2007). The impact of hope, self-esteem, and attributional style on adolescents’ school grades and emotional well-being: A longitudinal study. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(6), 1161 –1178. Corr, P. J., & Gray, J. A. (1995). Attributional style, socialization and cognitive ability as predictors of sales success: A predictive validity study. Personality and Individual Differences, 18(2), 241 –252. Corr, P. J., & Gray, J. A. (1996). Attributional style as a personality factor in insurance sales performance in the UK. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 69(1), 83–87.
  7. Crick, N. R., & Ladd, G. W. (1993). Children’s perceptions of their peer experiences: Attributions, loneliness, social anxiety, and social avoidance. Developmental Psychology, 29(2), 244–254.
  8. Fisher, R. T. (2001). Role stress, the type a behavior pattern, and external auditor job satisfaction and performance. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 13(1), 143–170.
  9. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and mea