SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 5

Examination Of Academic Profiles Of Value-Based Reimbursement Issued Studies

Değer Temelli Geri Ödeme (Value-Based Reimbursement) Konulu Çalışmaların Akademik Profilinin İncelenmesi

Yasin ÇİLHOROZ
Pages
1369–1373
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The highest number of publications has been in 2018 with 24.7%.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Healthcare services financing has functions that collecting revenue, pooling funds and reimbursing (paying) service providers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:When the findings related to the research areas have been examined, it has been seen that the publications are mostly conduct in the field of “Healthcare Sciences Services” (24.7%) and at least in the “Nursing” area (5.2%).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The highest number of publications has been in 2018 with 24.7%.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Healthcare services financing has functions that collecting revenue, pooling funds and reimbursing (paying) service providers. The function of reimbursing to the service providers is to transfer the collected revenues to the service providers in exchange for the use of the members' healthcare services. There are a number of methods used to reimburse service providers. One of these methods, value-based reimbursement method, refers to the payment system based on the health outcomes. In this study, which has been conducted in order to examine the extent to which the value-based reimbursement method takes place in the scientific literature within the framework of certain parameters, has been used Web of Science database. The obtained studies have been subjected to bibliometric analysis. When the findings related to the research areas have been examined, it has been seen that the publications are mostly conduct in the field of “Healthcare Sciences Services” (24.7%) and at least in the “Nursing” area (5.2%). The highest number of publications has been in 2018 with 24.7%.

Özet

Sağlık hizmetleri finansmanın gelir toplama, fon havuzlama ve hizmet sunuculara ödeme yapmaşeklinde işlevleri bulunmaktadır. Bu işlevlerden olan hizmet sunucularına ödeme yapma işlevi,toplanan gelirlerin üyelerin sağlık hizmetleri kullanımı karşılığında hizmet sunucularaaktarılmasıdır. Hizmet sunucularına ödeme yapmada kullanılan birtakım yöntemler bulunmaktadır.Bunlardan olan değer temelli ödeme yöntemi, ortaya çıkan sağlık sonuçlarına dayalı olarak yapılanödeme sistemini ifade etmektedir. Değer temelli ödeme yönteminin bilimsel literatürde ne ölçüdeyer aldığının belirli parametreler çerçevesinde incelenmesi amacıyla gerçekleştirilen bu çalışmadaWeb of Science veri tabanı kullanılmıştır. Ulaşılan çalışmalar bibliyometrik analize tabitutulmuştur. Araştırma alanlarına ilişkin bulgular incelendiğinde yayınların en fazla “Genel sağlıkbakım hizmetleri” alanında (%24,7) ve en az “Hemşirelik” alnında (%5,2) yapıldığı görülmektedir.En fazla yayının %24,7 ile 2018 yılında yapıldığı ortaya koyulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇİLHOROZ, Y. (2022). Examination Of Academic Profiles Of Value-Based Reimbursement Issued Studies. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 5, 1369–1373. https://ajindex.com/articles/439810

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Akyürek, Ç.E. (2012). Sağlıkta Bir Geri Ödeme Yöntemi Olarak Global Bütçe Ve Türkiye. SGDSosyal Güvenlik Dergisi, 2(2), 124-153. American Academy of Family Physician. (2019). Value- Based Payment. https://www.aafp.org/about/policies/all/value-basedpayment. html. Erişim Tarihi: 05.08.2019.
  2. Aydemir, İ., & Ağırbaş, İ. (2017). Sağlık Kurumlarına Yapılan Geri Ödeme Yöntemleri: Teşhis İlişkili Gruplar. Hacettepe Sağlık İdaresi Dergisi, 20(1), 1- 21. Ayers, D. C., Zheng, H., & Franklin, P. D. (2013). Integrating Patient-Reported Outcomes into Orthopaedic Clinical Practice: Proof of Concept from FORCE-TJR. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 471(11), 3419-3425.
  3. Çelik, Y. (2011).
  4. Sağlık Ekonomisi. Siyasal Kitabevi,
  5. Ankara.
  6. Dixon, A., Langenbrunner, J. and Mossialos, E. (2004), Facing the Challenges of Health Care. In Josep Figueras et al (eds), Health Systems in Transition: Learning From Experience, s.52-84, European Observatory on Health Care Systems Series. Dunk, A. M. & Arbon, P. A. (2009). Is it Time for a New Descriptor'pressure Injury': A Bibliometric Analysis. Wound Pract. Res, 17(4), 201-207.
  7. Garrison Jr, L. P., & Austin, M. F. (2007). The Economics Of Personalized Medicine: A Model of Incentives For Value Creation and Capture. Drug Information Journal, 41(4), 501-509.
  8. İstanbulluoğlu, H., Güleç, M., & Oğur, R. (2010). Sağlık Hizmetlerinin Finansman Yöntemleri. Dirim Tıp Gazetesi, 85(2), 86-99.
  9. Jia X., Tao D. ve Xinbiao G. (2014). Comprehensive Exploration of Urban Health by Bibliometric Analysis: 35 Years and 11,299 Articles. Scientometrics 99(3), 881-894.
  10. Kutzin, J., (2000). Towards Universal Health Care Coverage: A Goal-oriented Framework for Policy Analysis. The World Bank. Lee, C. I., & Enzmann, D. R. (2012). Measuring Radiology's Value in Time Saved. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 9(10), 713-717.
  11. Lee, K. and Goodman, H., (2002). Global Policy Networks: The Propagation of Health Care Financing Reform Since the 1980s.
  12. In Lee, K., Buse, K., Fustukian, S., (eds.), Health Policy in a Globalising World içinde, s.97-119, Cambridge University Press.
  13. Manchikanti, L., Parr, A. T., Singh, V., & Fellows, B. (2011). Ambulatory Surgery Centers And İnterventional Techniques: A Look at Long-Term Survival. Pain Physician, 14(2), E177-215. Miltenberger, B., Downs, S., & Greene, L. A. (2012). Value-Based Purchasing—What’s Ahead for Healthcare Providers. AHLA Connections (February), 16-22.
  14. Murray, C.J.L. & Frenk, J. (2000). A Framework for Assesing