SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3

Faith Tourism and “Possible” Faith Tourism Routes between Turkey and Georgia

İnanç Turizmi ve Türkiye İle Gürcistan Arasında “Muhtemel” İnanç Turizm Rotaları

Uğur ÇALIŞKAN
Pages
379–388
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Beyond being the first study done inthe one of less developed regions of Turkey and Georgia, this paper providesvaluable information to tourism planners and decision makers to build jointprojects between two neighbouring countries.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Local administrations support tourism because ofits positive economic effects on local economy besides, culture and faithtourism is important through preservation of cultural heritage and localdevelopment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, potential in faith tourism of North-eastern part ofTurkey and Georgia are explicated and to contribute to cross-bordercollaboration and tolerance between different religions, a proposal religioustourism route is designed as basic step.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Beyond being the first study done inthe one of less developed regions of Turkey and Georgia, this paper providesvaluable information to tourism planners and decision makers to build jointprojects between two neighbouring countries.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Local administrations support tourism because ofits positive economic effects on local economy besides, culture and faithtourism is important through preservation of cultural heritage and localdevelopment. In this study, potential in faith tourism of North-eastern part ofTurkey and Georgia are explicated and to contribute to cross-bordercollaboration and tolerance between different religions, a proposal religioustourism route is designed as basic step. Beyond being the first study done inthe one of less developed regions of Turkey and Georgia, this paper providesvaluable information to tourism planners and decision makers to build jointprojects between two neighbouring countries.

Özet

Yerel yönetimler, turizmi ekonomik etkileri nedeniyle desteklemektedirler ancak, kültür ve inanç turizminin, kültürel mirasın korunması ve yerel kalkınmaya da önemli katkıları bulunmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, kuzeydoğu Türkiye ile Gürcistan arasındaki inanç turizmi potansiyeli ortaya konulmuş ve farklı dinler arasındaki sınır ötesi işbirliği ve hoşgörüye katkıda bulunulmasının ilk adımı olarak “inanç turizm rotaları” belirlenmiştir. Böylesi çalışma, Türkiye'nin az gelişmiş bölgelerinden birisi ile Gürcistan özelinde yapılan ilk çalışma olmasının ötesinde sonuçlar, turizm planlamacılarına ve karar alıcılara iki komşu ülke arasında ortak projeler üretmek için değerli bilgiler sağlamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇALIŞKAN, U. (2022). Faith Tourism and “Possible” Faith Tourism Routes between Turkey and Georgia. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3, 379–388. https://ajindex.com/articles/439788

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Akbaş, H. (2016). Hopa ve Batum TSO’nun yaptıkları toplantıda işbirliği kararı alındı. (10.08.2017), retrieved from http://habercigazete.com/arsiv/haber_ detayc674. html ?haberID=12791 Alderman, D.H. (2002). Writing on the Graceland wall, on the importance of authorship in pilgrimage landscapes. Tourism Recreation Research, 2(72), 27–33.
  2. Ateljevic, I., & Doorne, S. (2002). Representing New Zealand: Tourism imagery and ideology. Annals of Tourism Research, 29(3), 648–667.
  3. Bar, D., & Cohen-Hattab, K. (2003). A new kind of pilgrimage: the modern tourist pilgrim of ninetieth century and early twentieth century Palestine. Middle Eastern Studies, 32(2), 131 – 148 Belhassen, Y. & Ebel, J. (2009). Tourism, faith and politics in the Holy Land: an ideological analysis of evangelical pilgrimage. Current Issues in Tourism, 12:4, 359-378.
  4. Blackman, A., Foster, F., Hyvonen, T., Jewell, B., Kuilboer, A., & Moscardo, G. (2004). Factors Contributing to Successful Tourism Development in Peripheral Regions. The Journal of Tourism Studies, 15(1), 59 – 70 Blasco, D., Guia, J., & Prats, L. (2014). Emergence of governance in cross-border destinations. Annals of Tourism Research, 49, 159-173.
  5. Briedenhann, J., & Wickens, E. (2004). Tourism routes as a tool for the economic development of rural areas— vibrant hope or impossible dream?. Tourism Management, 25, 71–79.
  6. Coene, F. (2010). The Caucasus: an Introduction. New York: Taylor & Francis. Cohen, E. (1988). Authenticity and commoditization in tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 15, 371-386
  7. Cohen-Hattab, K. (2004). Zionism, tourism, and the battle for Palestine: Tourism as a political propaganda tool. Israeli Studies, 9(1), 61–85.
  8. Collins-Kreiner, N. (2010). Current Jewish pilgrimage tourism: Modes and models of development. Tourism, 58, 259-270.
  9. Cornell S.E. (2005). Small Nations and Great Powers A Study Of Ethnopolitical Conflict In The Caucasus. London: Routledge Curzon. Delener, N. (1990). The effects of religious factors on perceived risk in durable goods purchase decisions. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 7 (3), 27–38.
  10. Digance, J. (2003). Pilgrimage at contested sites. Annals of Tourism Research, 30(1), 143–159.
  11. Doney, S. (2013). The Sacred Economy: Devotional Objects as Sacred Presence for German Catholics in Aachen and Trier, 1832-1937. International Journal of Religious Tourism and Pilgrimage, 1(1), 62-71.
  12. Dredge, D., & Jamal, T. (2013).
  13. Mobilities on the Gold Coast, Australia: Implications for destination governance and