Journals / Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

The Impact of Human Capital and Innovation Output on Economic Growth: Comparative Analysis of Malaysia and Turkey*

Beşeri Sermaye ve İnovasyon Çıktısı’nın Ekonomik Büyümeye Etkisi: Malezya ile Türkiye’nin Karşılaştırmalı Analizi

Pages
231–242
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The Causality tests indicate two unidirectional causalities that run fromhuman capital and innovation to economic growth and a bidirectional causality between physicalcapital and innovation in Malaysia.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The objective of this paper is to examine the impact of human capital and innovation output oneconomic growth in Malaysia and Turkey, over the period 1988-2013.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The conventional Unit RootTests reveal that all the variables are stationary after taking the first difference, and the JohansenTests of Co-Integration demonstrate that the variables are co-integrated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The Causality tests indicate two unidirectional causalities that run fromhuman capital and innovation to economic growth and a bidirectional causality between physicalcapital and innovation in Malaysia.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to examine the impact of human capital and innovation output oneconomic growth in Malaysia and Turkey, over the period 1988-2013. The conventional Unit RootTests reveal that all the variables are stationary after taking the first difference, and the JohansenTests of Co-Integration demonstrate that the variables are co-integrated. Specifically, we find thatin both countries, human capital, innovation output and physical capital have a significant positiveeffect on economic growth. The Causality tests indicate two unidirectional causalities that run fromhuman capital and innovation to economic growth and a bidirectional causality between physicalcapital and innovation in Malaysia.

Özet

Bu makalenin amacı, 1988-2013 dönemi, Malezya ve Türkiye’de beşeri sermaye ve inovasyon çıktısının ekonomik büyümeye etkisini incelemektir. Geleneksel Birim Kök Testleri, değişkenlerinin birinci farkı alındıktan sonra durağan olduğunu göstermektedir, Johansen Eş-Bütünleşme Testleri tüm değişkenlerin uzun dönemde eş-bütünleşik olduğunu göstermektedir. Özellikle, her iki ülkede, uzun dönemde beşeri sermaye, inovasyon çıktısı ve fiziki sermaye ekonomik büyümeye anlamlı ve pozitif etkisi olduğunu bulduk. Nedensellik Testi, Malezya değişkenlerinde beşeri sermaye ve inovasyon çıktısından ekonomik büyümeye iki tek yönlü nedensellik ilişki ve fiziki sermaye ile inovasyon çıktısı arasında çift yönlü nedensellik ilişkisi bulunduğunu göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

NDZEMBANTEH, A. N., WUSİMAN, N. (2022). The Impact of Human Capital and Innovation Output on Economic Growth: Comparative Analysis of Malaysia and Turkey*. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 231–242. https://ajindex.com/articles/439771

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Adhikary, B. K. (2011).
  2. FDI, Trade Openness, Capital Formation, and Economic Growth in Bangladesh: A Linkage Analysis. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(1), 16-28. Retrieved from http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/ download/7472/6488 Altiner, A., & Toktas, Y. (2017). Relationship Between Human Capital And Economic Growth: An Application To Developing Countries. Eurasian Journal of Economics and Finance, 5(3), 87-98. doi:10.15604/ejef.2017.05.03.007 Araç, A., & Ceylan, R. (2016). The Role of Human Capital in the Process of Economic Growth: the Case of Turkey. Journal of the Faculty of Economics andAdministrative Sciences Yüzüncü Yıl University, 2, 9- 33. Arısoy, İ. (2011). Testing Physical Investment and Growth Relationship in AK Model Perspective: The Case for Turkey (1968-2006). Maliye Dergisi(161), 283-297. Retrieved from https://maliyedergisi.sgb.gov.tr/yayinlar/md/161/015.p df Aslam, M., Shakar, S. A., & Hassan, G. (2013).
  3. Foreign Direct Investment, Human Capital and Economic Growth in Malaysia. 1-39. Retrieved from https://mpra.ub.unimuenchen.de/51930/1/MPRA_paper_51930.pdf
  4. Ayoyinka, O., & Isaiah, O. (2011). Employment and Economic Growth Nexus in Nigeria. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(11), 232-239. Retrieved from https://covenantuniversity.edu.ng/content/download/1 4152/94833/file/Employment+and+Growth+In+Niger ia_ijbss.pdf Bekmez, S., Köneş, A. Ç., & Günal, D. (2009). The Importance of Human Capital on Turkey’s Regional Development. TISK Academy, 4(7), 66-81. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&d b=uvt&AN=97914&site=eds-live Cai, D.-h., & Zhou, M.-c. (2003). A Two-sector Economic Growth Model with Labor Force Transfer. Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences, 8(3), 769–774. doi:10.1007/bf02900813 Canpolat, N. (2000). Accumulation of Human CApital and Economic Growth in Turkey. Hacettepe University Journal of Economics and Administrative Science, 18(2), 265-281.
  5. Chen, B.-L., Hsu, M., & Lai, C.-F. (2016). Relation between growth and unemployment in a model with labor-force participation and adverse labor institutions. Journal of Macroeconomics, 50(C), 273-292. doi:10.1016/j.jmacro.2016.10.004 Çakmak, E., & Gümüş, S. (2014). Human Capital and Economic Growth in Turkey: An Econometric Analysis (1960 - 2002). Ankara University