Journals / Abant Tıp Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

Microbiological Evaluation of Wagner Grade III and IV Diabetic Foot Ulcers

Wagner Evre III ve IV Diyabetik Ayak Ülserlerinin Mikrobiyolojik Değerlendirmesi

Pages
38–47
Publication Date
2017-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Enterococcus species showed 80%, staphylococcus showed as much as 42.8%, pseudomonas aeruginosa showed as much as 38.4%, E.coli showed as much as 64.5% drug resistance in the culture antibiogram studies. 31.6% of the isolated bacteria showed a multidrug resistance.DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Surgeons should be aware of common antibiotic resistance in diabetic foot cases had Wangner grade III and IV ulcer which require surgical intervention.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study to investigate the cases of Wagner grade III and IV diabetic foot ulcers which need critical clinical and surgical intervention, regarding to the pathogen microorganism populations and their antibiotic resistances.METHODS: A total 90 cases consist of 48 grade III and 42 grade IV ulcers according to the Wagner classification were included to the study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The carts are reviewed retrospectively, and patients’ demographics and microbiological culture results were recorded for analysis.RESULTS: Gram - microorganisms were isolated in 124 samples, Gram + microorganisms were isolated in 37 samples.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Enterococcus species showed 80%, staphylococcus showed as much as 42.8%, pseudomonas aeruginosa showed as much as 38.4%, E.coli showed as much as 64.5% drug resistance in the culture antibiogram studies. 31.6% of the isolated bacteria showed a multidrug resistance.DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Surgeons should be aware of common antibiotic resistance in diabetic foot cases had Wangner grade III and IV ulcer which require surgical intervention.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:124 samples
⚙️Variables:Diyabetik ayak enfeksiyonu · Wagner · Antibiyotik direnci

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study to investigate the cases of Wagner grade III and IV diabetic foot ulcers which need critical clinical and surgical intervention, regarding to the pathogen microorganism populations and their antibiotic resistances.METHODS: A total 90 cases consist of 48 grade III and 42 grade IV ulcers according to the Wagner classification were included to the study. The carts are reviewed retrospectively, and patients’ demographics and microbiological culture results were recorded for analysis.RESULTS: Gram - microorganisms were isolated in 124 samples, Gram + microorganisms were isolated in 37 samples. E. Coli, P. aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus and Proteus mirabilis were the most frequently detected infectious agents. Enterococcus species showed 80%, staphylococcus showed as much as 42.8%, pseudomonas aeruginosa showed as much as 38.4%, E.coli showed as much as 64.5% drug resistance in the culture antibiogram studies. 31.6% of the isolated bacteria showed a multidrug resistance.DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Surgeons should be aware of common antibiotic resistance in diabetic foot cases had Wangner grade III and IV ulcer which require surgical intervention.

Özet

GİRİŞ ve AMAÇ: Bu çalışmanın amacı patojen mikroorganizma popülasyonları ve antibiyotik dirençleri açısından kritik klinik ve cerrahi müdahale ihtiyacı duyulan Wagner evre III ve IV diyabetik ayak ülserli olguları incelemektir.YÖNTEM ve GEREÇLER: Wagner sınıflamasına göre evre 48 evre III ve 42 evre IV olmak üzere toplam 90 diyabetik ayak ülserli olgu çalışmaya dahil edildi.Hasta kayıtları gözden geçirildi ve hasta bilgileri ile mikrobiyoloji kültür sonuçları analiz için kaydedildi.BULGULAR: Gram - mikroorganizmalar 124 örnekte ve Gram + mikroorganizmalar 37 örnekte izole edildi. E. Coli, P. aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus ve Proteus mirabilis en sık görülen enfeksiyon ajanları olarak tespit edildi. Kültür antibiyogram sonuçlarında Enterococcus türleri % 80, Staphylococcus % 42,8, pseudomonas aeruginosa % 38,4, E.coli ise % 64,5 antibiyotik direnci gösterdi. İzole edilen bakterilerin % 31,6’sı ise birden çok ilaca direnç gösterdi.TARTIŞMA ve SONUÇ: Cerrahlar, cerrahi müdahale gerektiren Wagner Evre III ve IV ülserli diyabetik ayak olgularında yaygın antibiyotik direncinin farkında olmalıdırlar.

🔖

Cite This Article

TEKİN, F., SÜRMELİ, M., IŞIK, E., KARABEKMEZ, F. E. (2017). Microbiological Evaluation of Wagner Grade III and IV Diabetic Foot Ulcers. Abant Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 38–47. https://ajindex.com/articles/439750

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Sapico FL, Bessman AN. Foot infections in the diabetic patient. In: Gorbach SL, Bartlett JG, Blacklow NR, Eds. Infectious Diseases. Second ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1998:1270 – 2. Lipsky BA. Osteomyelitis of the foot in diabetic patients. Clin Infect Dis, 1997; 25:1318 – 26. Albrant DH. Management of foot ulcers in patients with Diabetes. J Am Pharm Assoc, 2000; 40: 467 – 74. Satman İ, Şengül AM, Uygur S, Salman F, Baştar İ, Sargın M, Tütüncü Y, Karşıdağ K, Dinççağ N, Özcan C et al. The TURdep Group, Diyabetes Div. İstanbul Univ. State Inst. Statistics and Min. Health – Turkey 36th EASD Jarusalem,17-21 September 2000. Provisional Programme p: 49. Diabetologia, 2000; Suppl 1. Ertuğrul MB, Baktıroğlu S, Aksoy M, Çalangu S. Diyabetik Ayak ve Enfeksiyonu. Klimik Dergisi, 2004; 17: 3 -12. Levin M.E. Foot Lesions in Patient with Diabetes Mellitus. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 1996; 25: 447-462. Boulton AJM: The importance of abnormal foot pressure and gait in the causation of foot ulcers. In Connor H, Boulton AJM, wards JD (edt). The Foot in Diabetes. John Wiley & Sons. 1987; 11-21. Wagner W F. The Dysvascular Foot: A System for diagnosis and treatment. Foot Ankle 1981; 2: 62-122. Ulusoy S. Diyabetik ayak enfeksiyonları. Modern Tıp Seminerleri: 33: 2006; 40-45.
  2. Bozkurt F, Tekin R, Çelen M.K, Ayaz C. Wagner classification and culture analysis of diabetic foot infection. Dicle Tıp Derg / Dicle Med J Cilt / Vol 38, No 1, 31-34.
  3. Gough A, Clapperton M, Rolando N, Foster AV, Philpott- Howard J, Edmonds ME: Randomised placebo-controlled trial of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor in diabetic foot infection. Lancet 1997; 350: 855-859.
  4. Ulusoy S, Arda B, Bayraktar F, Sesli E, Özinel MA, Yamazhan T, Ünal İ, Kısakol G, Tüzün M. Diyabetik ayak infeksiyonları: 179 olgunun değerlendirilmesi. Flora 2000; 5: 220-228. Grayson ML: Diabetic foot infections-antimicrobial therapy. Infect Dis Clin North Am l995;9: 143-161. 81 Armstrong DG, Lipsky BA. Advances in the treatment of diabetic foot infections. Diyabetes Technol Ther 2004; 6(2):167-177
  5. Lipsky BA, Berendt AR, Deery HG, Embil JM, Joseph WS, Karchmer AW, LeFrock JL, Lew DP, Mader JT, Norden C et al. Diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot infections. Guidelines for Diabetic Foot Infections. CID, 2004; 39 (1 October): 885 – 910. Ansari MA, Shukla VK. Foot Infections. Int J Low Extremy Wounds, 2005; 4(2): 74 – 87. Brodsky J, Schneidler C. Diabetic foot infections. Orthop Clin North Am 1991; 22(3):473-489. Shea KW. Ant