SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Populism As An Ideology

Bir İdeoloji Olarak Popülizm

Cennet USLU
Pages
217–230
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Three concepts adjacentto this core are also representation, anti-pluralism and democracy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Recently, it has become quite common to evaluate populism with the ideational approach.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Evaluatingideologies through a concept-based morphology, Michael Freeden's theoretical framework helps toexplain populism.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Three concepts adjacentto this core are also representation, anti-pluralism and democracy.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Recently, it has become quite common to evaluate populism with the ideational approach. Evaluatingideologies through a concept-based morphology, Michael Freeden's theoretical framework helps toexplain populism. According to Freeden, ideologies are divided into two main categories, thickcentered and thin-centered ideologies. Populism is suitable to be defined as a thin-centered ideologywith its structure that focuses on a limited number of issues-concepts and encompasses a narrowspace. In this study, if we will consider populism as an ideology, a proposal is presented about whatit’s the core and adjacent concepts might be. The core of populism is composed of four concepts thatare people and its surrounding at concepts of elites, unity and sovereignty. Three concepts adjacentto this core are also representation, anti-pluralism and democracy.

Özet

Günümüzde popülizmi fikrî yaklaşım içinde değerlendirmek yaygınlık kazanmıştır. İdeolojileri kavram temelli bir morfoloji üzerinden değerlendiren Michael Freeden’in teorik çerçevesi popülizmi açıklama konusunda yardımcı olmaktadır. Buna göre ideolojiler yoğun-merkezli ve seyrek-merkezli ideolojiler olmak üzere iki ana kategoriye ayrılmaktadırlar. Popülizm sınırlı sayıda konuya ve kavrama odaklanan ve dar bir alanı kuşatan yapısıyla seyrek-merkezli bir ideoloji olarak tanımlanmaya uygundur. Bu çalışmada popülizmi, bir ideoloji olarak ele aldığımız taktirde, çekirdek ve bitişik kavramlarının neler olabileceğine dair bir öneri sunulmuştur. Popülizmin çekirdeği, halk ve etrafını kuşatan seçkinler, birlik ve egemenlik olmak üzere dört kavramdan oluşmaktadır. Bu çekirdeğe bitişik olan kavramlar temsiliyet, anti-çoğulculuk ve demokrasi olarak kendini göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

USLU, C. (2022). Populism As An Ideology. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 217–230. https://ajindex.com/articles/439703

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Abts, K. &Rummens, S. (2007). “Populism versus Democracy”, Political Studies. 55(2), 405–24.
  2. Arditi, B. (2010) Liberalizmin Kıyılarında Siyaset. Emine Ayhan (çev), İstanbul:
  3. Metis Yayınları Arter, D. (2010). “The Breakthrough of Another West European Populist Radical Right Party? The Case of the True Finns”.Government and Opposition.45(4),484–504.
  4. Aslanıdıs, P. (2016) “Is Populism an Ideology? A Refutationand a New Perspective”, PoliticalStudies. 64(1), 88-104.
  5. Ball, T. &Dagger, R. &O’neıll, D. (2019). PoliticalIdeologiesandtheDemocraticIdeal.11. Ed., New York&London: RoutledgePress Bartolini, S. (2011). “Political Parties, Ideology and Populism in the Post-Crisis Europe”. Poros Conference. 7-10 Temmuz. Erişim adresi: http://europeanseminars.eliamep.gr/wp content/uploads/2011/07/Stefano-Bartolini Paper.pdf, Erişim Tarihi 23.07.2020
  6. Berlin, I. (1968). “To Define Popülism”. Government and Opposition.3(2), 137-180.
  7. Betz, H.G. &Immerfall, S. (1998). The New Politics of the Right: Neo-Populist Parties and Movements in Established Democracies. BETZ, Hans Georg&IMMERFALL Stefan (ed). New York: St. Martins Press.
  8. Canovan, M. (2002). “Taking Politics to the People: Populism as the Ideology of Democracy”, Democracies and the Populist Challenge. Y. Ményand Y. Surel (ed.). London: Palgrave Macmillan. Canovan, M. (1981). Populism. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt DiTella, T. S. (1997). “Populism in to the Twenty-First Century”. Government and Opposition. 32(2), 187– 200. Dornbusch, R. &Edwards, S. (1991). The Macroeconomics of Populism in Latin America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  9. Durkheim, E. (2013). İntihar. Z. Zühre İlkgelen (çev). İstanbul:
  10. Pozitif Yayıncılık Espejo, Paulina O. (2017). “Populism and the Idea of the People”, The Oxford Handbook of Populism. C.R. Kaltwasser&P. Taggart (ed). Oxford: Oxford University Press, ss. 607- 628. Freeden, M. (1996). Ideologies and Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press Freeden, M. (1998) “Is Nationalism a Distinct Ideology?”. Political Studies. 46(4), 748-765.
  11. Freeden, M. (2011)
  12. İdeoloji, Ankara:
  13. Dost Yayınları.
  14. Hayward, J. (1996). “The Popülist Challenge to Elitist Democracy in Europe”, Elitism, Populsim, and Europpean Politics, J. Hayward (ed). Oxford: Clarendon Press, ss.10-32
  15. Hellström, A. (2013). “Help! The Populists Are Coming: Appeals to the People in Contemporary Swedish Politics”. MIM Working Paper Series, No: 13:4. Malmö, Sweden: Malmö University. Inglehart, F.R.&Norris, P. (2016). “Trump, Brexit and t