SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Androloji Bülteni / 2022 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1

Investigation of the association between body mass index, classical sperm parameters and sperm DNA fragmentation: A cross-sectional study

Beden kitle indeksinin, klasik sperm parametreleri ve sperm DNA fragmantasyonu ile ilişkisinin incelenmesi: Kesitsel bir araştırma

Emre SALABAŞ
Semiye Elif ELKATMIŞ
Pages
32–37
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

RESULTS: There was no significant different between three groups in terms of sperm concentration (I: 55.0 million/ml, II: 64.2 million/ml, III: 47.7 million/ml; p>0.1) and progressive motility (I: 41.0%, II: 42.6%, III: 35.4%; p>0.1), while normal sperm morphology rate was lower in obese group than the overweight group (I: 4.0%, II: 4.9%, III: 3.1; p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: The number of over-weight and obese individuals which increase progressively due to the life style changes in developed countries, became a worldwide problem.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Acridine orange was used for DNA fragmentation test, aniline blue was used for maturation analysis, and chromomycin A3 (CMA3) staining method was used for sperm chromatin condensation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:RESULTS: There was no significant different between three groups in terms of sperm concentration (I: 55.0 million/ml, II: 64.2 million/ml, III: 47.7 million/ml; p>0.1) and progressive motility (I: 41.0%, II: 42.6%, III: 35.4%; p>0.1), while normal sperm morphology rate was lower in obese group than the overweight group (I: 4.0%, II: 4.9%, III: 3.1; p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The number of over-weight and obese individuals which increase progressively due to the life style changes in developed countries, became a worldwide problem. Obesity has a negative impact on fertility due to comorbid diseases, hormonal disruptions and over production of free oxygen radicals. Our objective was the investigation of the association between body mass index (BMI), classical sperm parameters and sperm DNA integrity. MATERIAL and METHODS: Males who had a semen analysis in our hospital were classified into three groups: Ideal weight group (I), overweight group (II) and obese group (III). Standard semen analysis was done in all three groups. Acridine orange was used for DNA fragmentation test, aniline blue was used for maturation analysis, and chromomycin A3 (CMA3) staining method was used for sperm chromatin condensation. RESULTS: There was no significant different between three groups in terms of sperm concentration (I: 55.0 million/ml, II: 64.2 million/ml, III: 47.7 million/ml; p>0.1) and progressive motility (I: 41.0%, II: 42.6%, III: 35.4%; p>0.1), while normal sperm morphology rate was lower in obese group than the overweight group (I: 4.0%, II: 4.9%, III: 3.1; p

Özet

AMAÇ: Gelişmiş ülkelerdeki yaşam tarzı değişiklileri sebebiyle artan obez ve aşırı kilolu kişilerin sayısı, dünya çapında bir sağlık problemi hale gelmiştir. Obezite, ek komorbid hastalıklara, hormonal bozulmalara, serbest oksijen radikal artışına sebep olarak, üreme fonksiyonunu olumsuz yönde etkilemektedir. Çalışmamızın amacı, beden kitle indeksinin hem klasik sperm parametreleri hem de fonksiyonel sperm kalitesi üzerindeki etkilerini araştırmaktır. GEREÇ ve YÖNTEMLER: Hastanemizde semen analizi yapılan erkekler, ideal ki- lolu (1. Grup), fazla kilolu (2. Grup) ve obez (3. Grup) olmak üzere üç gruba ayrıl- mış, bireylerde klasik sperm parametreleri ve sperm DNA yapısı incelenmiştir. Her üç grupta da standart semen analizinin yanında, sperm DNA fragmantasyon (SDF) testi için akridin oranj, maturasyon analizi için anilin mavisi (AB), sperm kromatin kondensasyonu için kromomisin A3 (CMA3) boyama yöntemi kullanıldı. BULGULAR: Obezitenin, sperm konsantrasyonunu (1. Grup: 55,0 milyon/ml, 2. Grup: 64,2 milyon/ml, 3. Grup: 47,7 milyon/ml; p>0,1) ve ileri hareketliğini (1. Grup: %41,0, 2. Grup: %42,6, 3. Grup: %35,5; p>0,1) istatistiki olarak et- kilemediği görülürken, normal sperm morfolojisi obez grupta daha düşük bulun- muştur (1. Grup: %4,0, 2. Grup: %4,9, 3. Grup: %3,2; p

🔖

Cite This Article

SALABAŞ, E., ELKATMIŞ, S. E. (2022). Investigation of the association between body mass index, classical sperm parameters and sperm DNA fragmentation: A cross-sectional study. Androloji Bülteni, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1, 32–37. https://ajindex.com/articles/439607

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Yanovski JA. Obesity: Trends in underweight and obesity - scale of the problem. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018
  2. 5–6. [CrossRef ] 2. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Worldwide trends in body-mass index, underweight, overweight, and obesity from 1975 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 2416 population-based measurement studies in 128.9 million children, adolescents, and adults. Lancet. 2017
  3. 2627–42. [CrossRef ] 3. Zhu G, Zhang Y, Dong J, Liu Y, Zhao F, Li T, et al. Association Between Body Mass Index and Male Sperm Apoptosis and Apoptosis-Related Factors. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2021
  4. 1043–51. [CrossRef ] 4. Mintziori G, Nigdelis MP, Mathew H, Mousiolis A, Goulis DG, Mantzoros CS. The effect of excess body fat on female and male reproduction. Metab Clin Exp 2020
  5. 154193. [CrossRef ] 5. MacDonald AA, Herbison GP, Showell M, Farquhar CM. The impact of body mass index on semen parameters and reproductive hormones in human males: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Human Reprod Update. 2010
  6. 293–311. [CrossRef ] 6. Sermondade N, Faure C, Fezeu L, Shayeb AG, Bonde JP, Jensen TK, et al. BMI in relation to sperm count: an updated systematic review and collaborative meta-analysis. Human Reprod Update. 2012
  7. 221–31. [CrossRef ] 7. Belloc S, Cohen-Bacrie M, Amar E, Izard V, Benkhalifa M, Dalléac A, de Mouzon J. High body mass index has a deleterious effect on semen parameters except morphology: results from a large cohort study. Fertil Steril. 2014
  8. 1268–73. [CrossRef ] 8. Agarwal A, Majzoub A, Baskaran S, Panner Selvam MK, Cho CL, Henkel R, et al. Sperm DNA Fragmentation: A New Guideline for Clinicians. World J Mens Health. 2020
  9. [CrossRef ] 9. Zini A. Are sperm chromatin and DNA defects relevant in the clinic? Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2011
  10. 78–85. [CrossRef ] 10. Chen Q, Zhao J-Y, Xue X, Zhu G-X. The association between sperm DNA fragmentation and reproductive outcomes following intrauterine insemination, a meta analysis. Reprod Toxicol. 2019
  11. 50–5. [CrossRef ] 11. Sugihara A, Van Avermaete F, Roelant E, Punjabi U, De Neubourg D. The role of sperm DNA fragmentation testing in predicting intra-uterine insemination outcome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020
  12. 8–15. [CrossRef ] 12. Cissen M, van Wely M, Scholten I, Mansell S, Bruin JPD, Mol BW, et al. Measuring Sperm DNA Fragmentation and Clinical Outcomes of Medically Assisted Reproduction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS One. 2