SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anatomy / 2019 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2

Contribution of 3D modeling to anatomy education: a pilot study

Hale ÖMTEM
Başak Naz ULUSOY
Tuğçe ŞENÇELİKLER
Ece AKÇİÇEK
A. Sena KOÇYİĞİT
U. Sena PENEKLİ
Sezin SUNGUR
Beste TANRIYAKUL
Journal
Anatomy
Pages
116–121
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results of the anatomy quizzes given before and after the 3Dmodeling training were statistically evaluated.Results: A statistically significant difference was found between the results of the quizzes administered before and after thetraining (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Traditional anatomy education involves theoretical lectures and practical applications, including examination ofcadavers and models.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In recent years, new technologies in biomedical fields have included three-dimensional (3D) modelingtechniques that enable rapid creation of a 3D computer version of physical models.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results of the anatomy quizzes given before and after the 3Dmodeling training were statistically evaluated.Results: A statistically significant difference was found between the results of the quizzes administered before and after thetraining (p
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Traditional anatomy education involves theoretical lectures and practical applications, including examination ofcadavers and models. In recent years, new technologies in biomedical fields have included three-dimensional (3D) modelingtechniques that enable rapid creation of a 3D computer version of physical models. Such 3D modeling can be used as anactive educational tool that enables students to better understand organs and how these organs are positioned relative toone another in anatomy education. The aim of this study was to analyze how the active role and involvement of students in3D modeling contributes to anatomy education and 3D thinking.Methods: In this study, 29 Term II students studying in the Baflkent University School of Medicine were enrolled with 3D modeling training based on an anonymized CT sample. In addition to defining anatomic structures observed in the sections, 3Dimages of the common carotid artery, thyroid gland and trachea were obtained using the TT3D-BMMP software, and the position of these structures relative to one another was evaluated. The results of the anatomy quizzes given before and after the 3Dmodeling training were statistically evaluated.Results: A statistically significant difference was found between the results of the quizzes administered before and after thetraining (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖMTEM, H., ULUSOY, B. N., ŞENÇELİKLER, T., AKÇİÇEK, E., KOÇYİĞİT, A. S., PENEKLİ, U. S., SUNGUR, S., TANRIYAKUL, B. (2022). Contribution of 3D modeling to anatomy education: a pilot study. Anatomy, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2, 116–121. https://ajindex.com/articles/439463

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Vaccarezza M. Best evidence of anatomy education? Insights from the most recent literature. Anat Sci Educ 2018;11:215–216
  2. Dinsmore CE, Daugherty S, Zeitz HJ. Teaching and learning gross anatomy. Clin Anat 1999;12:110–4
  3. Winkelmann A. Anatomical dissection as a teaching method in medical school: a review of the evidence. Med Educ 2007; 41:15–22
  4. Garas M, Vaccarezza M, Newland G. 3D-Printed specimens as a valuable tool in anatomy education: a pilot study. Ann Anat 2018; 219:57–66
  5. Bayko S, Yarkan ‹, Çetkin M, Kuto¤lu T. Views of medical students on anatomy education supported by plastinated cadavers. Anatomy 2018;12:90–6
  6. Vorstenbosch MA, Klaassen TP, Donders AR, Kooloos JG, Bolhuis SM, Laan RF. Learning anatomy enhances spatial ability. Anat Sci Educ 2013;6:257–62
  7. Abouhasem Y, Dayal M, Savanah Štrkalj G. The application of 3D printing in anatomy education. Med Educ Online 2015;20:29847
  8. Rehman FU, Khan SN, Yunus SM. Students, perception of computer assisted teaching and learning of anatomy – In a scenario where cadavers are lacking. Biomed Res 2012;23:215–8
  9. Cui D, Wilson TD, Rockhold RW, Lehman MN, Lynch JC. Evaluation of the effectiveness of 3D vascular stereoscopic models in anatomy instruction for first year medical students. Anat Sci Educ 2017;10:34–45
  10. Bücking TM, Hill ER, Robertson JL, Maneas E, Plumb AA, Nikitichev DI. From medical imaging data to 3D printed anatomical models. PLoS One 2017;12:e0178540
  11. Pugliese L, Marconi S, Negrello E, Mauri V, Peri A, Gallo V, Auricchio F, Pietrabissa A. The clinical use of 3D printing in surgery. Updates Surg 2018;70:381–8
  12. Krauel L, Fenollosa F, Riaza L, Pérez M, Tarrado X, Morales A, Gomà J, Mora J. Use of 3D prototypes for complex surgical oncologic cases. World J Surg 2016;40:889–94
  13. Venail F, Deveze A, Lallemant B, Lallemant B, Guevara N, Mondain M. Enhancement of temporal bone anatomy learning with computer 3D rendered imaging softwares. Med Teach 2010;32:e282–8
  14. Standring S (Editor). Gray’s anatomy. 39th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2005
  15. Ozgur Z, Celik S, Govsa F, Ozgur T. Anatomical and surgical aspects of the lobes of the thyroid glands. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2011; 268:1357–63
  16. Ranade AV, Rai R, Pai MM, Nayak SR, Prakash, Krisnamurthy A, Narayana S. Anatomical variations of the thyroid gland: possible surgical implications. Singapore Med J 2008;49:831–4
  17. Lin C, Gao J, Zheng H, Zhao J, Yang H, Zheng Y, Cao Y, Chen