Journals / Anatomy / 2021 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2

Distance education during social isolation: an evaluation of student attitudes and perceptions using the web-based learning environment instrument (WEBLEI)

Journal
Anatomy
Pages
163–170
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: This study contributes to a better understanding of the pros and cons of distance education by evaluating the attitudes and perceptions of university students.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: Until recently, distance education at universities has supplemented face-to-face education in blended programs that combine the two.
📊
Key Findings & Data:But during the COVID-19 pandemic in the spring of the 2019–2020 academic year, many universities were forced to conduct distance education exclusively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: This study contributes to a better understanding of the pros and cons of distance education by evaluating the attitudes and perceptions of university students.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2019–2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:distance education · online lessons · social isolation

Abstract

Objectives: Until recently, distance education at universities has supplemented face-to-face education in blended programs that combine the two. But during the COVID-19 pandemic in the spring of the 2019–2020 academic year, many universities were forced to conduct distance education exclusively. The aim of this study is to determine the perceptions, thoughts, and experiences of university students regarding the completely online process of distance education during this period. Methods: In this process, all theoretical lessons and exams were conducted on the advance learning management system (ALMS) for distance education at İstinye University. The present study used the original form of WEBLEI to survey 324 students from medicine, pharmacy and health science departments at İstinye University. Results: WEBLEI measures students’ perceptions using four scales: access, interaction, response and results. Though students did not experience problems accessing online lessons or interacting with their teachers and other students, they did not find online distance education alone more effective and satisfying than combined with face-to-face education. Conclusion: This study contributes to a better understanding of the pros and cons of distance education by evaluating the attitudes and perceptions of university students.

🔖

Cite This Article

Demirtafl, ‹., Ayy›ld›ız, S., Ayy›ld›z, B., Kufl, K. Ç. (2022). Distance education during social isolation: an evaluation of student attitudes and perceptions using the web-based learning environment instrument (WEBLEI). Anatomy, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2, 163–170. https://ajindex.com/articles/439386

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Kaplan AM, Haenlein M. Higher education and the digital revolution: about MOOCs, SPOCs, social media, and the cookie monster. Business Horizons 2016;59:441–50.
  2. Cleveland-Innes MF, Garrison DR. Introduction to distance education: understanding teaching and learning in a new era. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group; 2010. p. 296. Allen IE, Seaman J. Staying the course. Online education in the United States, 2008. Newburyport (MA): Sloan Consortium (NJ1); 2008. p. 28. Bernard RM, Brauer A, Abrami PC, Surkes M. The development of a questionnaire for predicting online learning achievement. Distance Education 2004;25:31–47. Singh P. Unleashing the potential of ODL - reaching the unreached. Proceedings of the International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE) International Conference, 2017.
  3. Young JR. “Hybrid” teaching seeks to end the divide between traditional and online instruction. Chronicle of Higher Education 2002; 48:33–4. Lloyd-Smith L. Exploring the advantages of blended instruction at community colleges and technical schools. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching 2010;6:508–15.
  4. Dantas AM, Kemm RE. A blended approach to active learning in a physiology laboratory-based subject facilitated by an e-learning component. Adv Physiol Educ 2008;32:65–75.
  5. Joynes V, Fuller R. Legitimisation, personalisation and maturation: using the experiences of a compulsory mobile curriculum to reconceptualise mobile learning. Med Teach 2016;38:621–7. Kirtman L. Online versus in-class courses: an examination of differences in learning outcomes. Issues in Teacher Education 2009;18: 103–16. Gould T. Hybrid classes?: maximizing institutional resources and student learning. Proceedings of the 2003 Association Supporting Computer Uses in Education (ASCUE) Conference, 2003;54–9. Distance learning task force 2007. Quality issues in distance learning. AACSB International-The Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business. [Internet]. [Retrieved on January 13, 2021]. Available from: https://numerons.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/16quality-issues-in-distance-learning.pdf
  6. Green RA, Whitburn LY. Impact of introduction of blended learning in gross anatomy on student outcomes. Anat Sci Educ 2016;9: 422–30.
  7. Mathiowetz V, Yu CH, Quake-Rapp C. Comparison of a gross anatomy laboratory to online anatomy software for teaching anatomy. Anat Sci Educ 2016;9:52–9.
  8. Swinnerton BJ, Morris NP, Hotchkiss S, Pickering JD. The integration of an anatomy massive open online cour