Journals / Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2

An alternative to studies of income distribution: University of Texas inequality project data sets

Gelir dağılımı çalışmaları için bir alternatif: Texas üniversitesi eşitsizlik projesi veri setleri

Pages
35–42
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, this work is not a generel literature survey on income inequality but rather it deals with some particular works by UTIP that uses these data sets.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Income inequality is one of the most important issues in the economic literature.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Since the 1980s, in line with neoliberal model, income inequality has increased both between and within countries.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, this work is not a generel literature survey on income inequality but rather it deals with some particular works by UTIP that uses these data sets.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Income inequality is one of the most important issues in the economic literature. Since the 1980s, in line with neoliberal model, income inequality has increased both between and within countries. However, it is not easy to have high quality data for long period of time particulary for the developing countries. This study aims to introduce the University of Texas Inequality Project - United Nations Indusrial Development Organization (UTIP-UNIDO) and Estimated Household Income Inequality (EHII) data sets, which are not commonly utilized in the Turkish literature, as alternative to Deininger ve Squire (DS) data set that has some serious problems. These data sets have been constructed by calculating pay inequality in the manufacturing sector by utilizing between-group components of Theil Index and by transforming it into Gini coefficient form. Therefore, this work is not a generel literature survey on income inequality but rather it deals with some particular works by UTIP that uses these data sets.

Özet

Gelir eşitsizliği iktisat yazınında ele alınan en önemli konulardan biridir. Neoliberal modelle birlikte 1980’li yıllardan itibaren hem ülkeler arasında hem de ülke içinde gelir eşitsizliği artmaktadır. Ancak, özellikle ge- lişmekte olan ülkelerde geniş bir dönemi kapsayan sağ- lıklı veriye ulaşmak çok güçtür. Bu çalışma, gelir da- ğılımı yazınında sıklıkla kullanılan ancak bazı önemli sorunlar içeren Deininger ve Squire (DS) veri setine alternatif olan, fakat özellikle Türkçe yazında yaygın olarak kullanılmayan Texas Üniversitesi Eşitsizlik Pro- jesi - Birleşmiş Milletler Endüstriyel Kalkınma Organi- zasyonu/University of Texas Inequality Project United Nations Indusrial Development Organization (UTIP- UNIDO) ve Tahmin Edilmiş Hanehalkı Gelir Eşitsizli- ği/Estimated Household Income Inequality (EHII) veri setlerini tanıtmayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu setler imalat sanayindeki ücret eşitsizliğinin Theil indeksinin grup- lararası bileşeni ile hesaplanması ve Gini katsayısı for- matına dönüştürülmesi ile oluşturulmuştur. Dolayısıy- la, bu çalışma genel bir gelir eşitsizliği yazın incelemesi olmayıp, spesifik olarak sadece bu veri setlerini kulla- nan bazı UTIP çalışmalarına değinmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ELVEREN, A. Y. (2022). An alternative to studies of income distribution: University of Texas inequality project data sets. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2, 35–42. https://ajindex.com/articles/439126

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Adair, C. (2006). “Structural Change, Inequality and Growth in Mexico,” UTIP Working Paper No: 35. Aksoğan, G. ve Elveren, A. Y. (2012). “Türkiye’de Sa- vunma, Sağlık, Eğitim Harcamaları ve Gelir Eşit- sizliği (1970-2008): Ekonometrik Bir İnceleme,” Sosyoekonomi, 2012/1, 263-280.
  2. Atkinson, A. B. ve Brandolini, A. (2001). “Promi- se and pitfalls in the use of ‘‘secondary’’ data-sets: income inequality in OECD countries as a case study,” Journal of Economic Literature, 39: 771–799.
  3. Calmon, P. P., Conceição, P. ve Galbraith, J. K. (2000). “The evolution of industrial wage inequa- lity in Mexico and Brazil,” Review of Development Economics, 4, 194–203.
  4. Deininger, K. ve Squire, L. (1996). “A New Data Set Measuring Income Inequality,” World Bank Econo- mic Review, 10, 565-591
  5. Derin-Güre, P. ve Elveren, A. Y. (yayınlanacak). “Does Income Inequality Derive Separatist Ter- rorism in Turkey?,” Defence and Peace Economics, yayınlanacak Elveren, A. Y. (2009). “A Brief Note on Pay Trend in Cyprus,” Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6 (1), 111-116.
  6. Elveren, A. Y. (2010). “Wage Inequality in Turkey: Decomposition by Statistical Regions, 1980-2001,” Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, 22(1), 55-72.
  7. Elveren, A. Y. (2012). “Defense Spending and Income Inequality: Evidence on Cointegration and Causa- lity for Turkey, 1963-2007,” Defence and Peace Eco- nomics, 23(3), 289-301.
  8. Elveren, A. Y. ve Galbraith, J. K. (2009). “Pay Inequ- ality in Turkey in the Neo-Liberal Era: 1980-2001,” European Journal of Comparative Economics, 6(2), 177-206.
  9. Elveren, A. Y., Örnek, İ., ve Akel, G. (2012). “Inter- nationalisation, Growth and Income Inequality: A Cointegration Analysis for Turkey, 1970-2007,” International Review of Applied Economics, 26(5), 579-595. Eurostat, http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu
  10. Galbraith, J. K. (2007). “Global inequality and global macroeconomics,” Journal of Policy Modeling, 29, 587-607.
  11. Galbraith, J. K. (2009). “Inequality, Unemployment and Growth: New Measures for Old Controversi- es,” Journal of Economic Inequality, 7(2), 189-206.
  12. Galbraith, J. K. (2011). “Inequality and economic and political change: a comparative perspective,” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Soci- ety, 4, 13-27.
  13. Galbraith, J. K. ve Garcilazo, J. E. (2005). “Pay Inequ- ality in Europe 1995 2000: Convergence Between Countries and Stability Inside,” European Journal of Comparative Economics, 2(2), 139-175.
  14. Galbraith, J. K. ve Garza-Cantú, V. (1999)