Journals / Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

The Views of Teacher Candidates on the Contributions of Portfolio Assessment in Developing Environmental Consciousness

Çevre Bilinci Geliştirmede Portfolyo Değerlendirmenin Katkısı Konusunda Öğretmen Adaylarının Görüşleri

Pages
121–144
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, it was found that the views of teacher candidates were positive on the contribution of portfolio evaluation in developing environmental consciousness.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the constructivist learning theory, the assessment has been carried out as based on the process.
📊
Key Findings & Data:While portfolio is described as a collection comprised of student outcomes, the process covering the analysis of this collection is defined as a portfolio assessmen Portfolio assessment requires the evaluation of individual or group performance of th. student, in the learning process rather than evaluating the learning, in a very limited period of time, by checking the answers obtained via multiple choice questions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, it was found that the views of teacher candidates were positive on the contribution of portfolio evaluation in developing environmental consciousness.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2004-2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In the constructivist learning theory, the assessment has been carried out as based on the process. The portfolio assessment is one of the assessment techniques based on process. While portfolio is described as a collection comprised of student outcomes, the process covering the analysis of this collection is defined as a portfolio assessmen Portfolio assessment requires the evaluation of individual or group performance of th. student, in the learning process rather than evaluating the learning, in a very limited period of time, by checking the answers obtained via multiple choice questions. This study aims at determining the views of teacher candidates on the contributions of portfolio assessment in developing environmental consciousness. Teacher candidates, totally 109, studying in Primary Education Teacher Training Program of Anadolu University Education Faculty and preparing portfolio within the framework of Environment Science course, participated into this research in the spring term of 2004-2005 academic year. The data of the research were collected by a questionnaire. In the analysis of the data, both the quantitative and qualitative data were utilized. In the analysis of quantitative data, the SPSS computer program was used, the frequencies (f) and percentages (%) were calculated and Chi Square (X2) analysis technique was employed. In the analysis of qualitative data, the descriptive analysis technique was used. As a result, it was found that the views of teacher candidates were positive on the contribution of portfolio evaluation in developing environmental consciousness.

Özet

Yapılandırmacı öğrenme kuramında değerlendirme sürece dayalı olarak yapılmakta­dır. Sürece dayalı değerlendirme tekniklerinden biri de portfolyo değerlendirmedir. Port­folyo öğrenci ürünlerinden oluşan koleksiyon olarak belirtilirken; bu koleksiyonun anali­zini kapsayan süreç de portfolyo değerlendirme olarak tanımlanmaktadır. Portfolyo değer­lendirme, öğrencinin öğrenmesini sadece sınırlı bir zaman diliminde çoktan seçmeli soru­lara verdiği cevaplara bakarak değerlendirmekten ziyade, öğrencinin öğrenme sürecinde bireysel ya da grup olarak gösterdiği performansın değerlendirilmesini gerekli kılmakta­dır. Bu araştırma ile çevre bilinci geliştirmede portfolyo değerlendirmenin katkısı konu­sunda öğretmen adaylarının görüşlerinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmaya 2004-2005 öğretim yılı bahar döneminde Anadolu Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Sınıf Öğretmen­liği Programında yer alan Çevre Bilimi dersi kapsamında portfolyo hazırlayan toplam 109 öğretmen adayı katılmıştır. Araştırmanın verileri anket yoluyla toplanmıştır. Verilerin çö­zümlenmesinde nicel ve nitel veriler kullanılmıştır. Nicel verilerin çözümlenmesinde SPSS paket programı kullanılmış, frekans (f) ve yüzdeler (%) hesaplanmış, ki kare (X2) analiz tekniği uygulanmıştır. Nitel verilerin çözümlenmesinde betimsel analiz tekniği kullanılmış­tır. Araştırmanın sonucunda çevre bilinci geliştirmede portfolyo değerlendirmenin katkısı konusunda öğretmen adaylarının görüşlerinin olumlu yönde olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

UZUN, N. (2022). The Views of Teacher Candidates on the Contributions of Portfolio Assessment in Developing Environmental Consciousness. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 121–144. https://ajindex.com/articles/439069

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Altunışık, R., Coşkun, R., Yıldırım, E. ve Bayraktaroğlu, S. (2002). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri SPSS Uygulamalı. Sakarya: Sakarya Kitabevi.
  2. Avraamidou, L. ve Zembal, S. C. (2002). Exploring the Influence of Web-based Portfo­lio Development on Learning To Teach Elementary Science. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Nationla Association for Research in Science Teaching. (New Orleans, LA, April 7-10, 2002). http://web29.epnet.com/. (erişim tarihi 17 Ağustos 2005).
  3. Baki, A. ve Birgin, O. (2004). Alternatif Değerlendirme Aracı Olarak Bilgisayar Destek­li Bireysel Gelişim Dosyası Uygulamasından Yansımalar: Bir Özel Durum Çalışma­sı. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, [Elektronik Der­gi]. 3(3), 79-99.
  4. Barootchi, N. ve Keshavarz, M. H. (2002). Assessment of Achievement Through Portfo­lios and Teacher-made Tests. Educational Research, 44(3), 279-288.
  5. Bogdan, R. C. ve S. K. Biklen (1998). Qualitative Research in Education. Third edition Boston: Allyn&Bacon. Brandt, R. (1989). On Misuse of Testing: A Conversation with George Madaus. Educa­tional Leadership, 46(6), 26-29.
  6. Brown, C. A. (2002). Portfolio Assessment: How Far Have We Come? net.com/. (erişim tarihi 17 Ağustos 2005)
  7. Brown, J. O. (2002). The Portfolio: A Tool for Workplace Learning and Development. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Reserah As­sociation. (New Orleans, LA, April 1-5, 2002). http://web29.epnet.com/. (erişim ta­rihi 17 Ağustos 2005).
  8. Caldarelli, M. K. (2004). Targeting Environmental Beliefs in a Community College En­vironmental Science Course, http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb (erişim tarihi 04 Mayıs 2005).
  9. Carney, J. ve Jay, J. K. (2002, February 14-16). Translating Theory into Practice: The Dilemmas of Teacher Portfolios. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the So­uthwest Educational Reserah Association (25th, Austin; TX February 14-16,2002). http://web29.epnet.com/. (erişim tarihi 17 Ağustos 2005).
  10. Chatel, R. G. (2001). Portfolio Development: Some Considerations. http://www.sjc.edu/faculty_pages/rchatel/rchatel/. (erişim tarihi 12 Nisan 2005).
  11. Covitt, B. A. (2004). Motivation in Environmental Education: Supporting Middle School Students' Motives for Helping the Chesapeake Bay. est.umi.com/pqdweb (erişim tarihi 04 Mayıs 2005).
  12. Creswell, W. J. (1994). Research Design: Qualitative Quantitative Approaches. Califor­nia: Sage Publications. Delandshere, G. ve Arens, S. A. (2003). Examining the Quality of the Evidence i