Journals / Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

Academic Dishonesty: Getting Easier with Internet and ICT

Bilgi İletişim Teknolojileri ve İnternet'le Kolaylaşan Akademik Usulsüzlük

Pages
503–518
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this respect, factors constituting academic dishonesty, the prevalence of academic dishonesty, academic dishonesty facilitated through ICT and precautions to be taken are discussed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Internet serves as a ground for academic misdemeanors while it also contributes to the development of science.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Research studies show that Internet facilitates triggers and spreads academic dishonesty.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this respect, factors constituting academic dishonesty, the prevalence of academic dishonesty, academic dishonesty facilitated through ICT and precautions to be taken are discussed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Internet serves as a ground for academic misdemeanors while it also contributes to the development of science. Research studies show that Internet facilitates triggers and spreads academic dishonesty. The purpose of the current study is to scrutinize the notion of academic dishonesty facilitated through Internet (e-dishonesty), to raise awareness regarding the threats of e-dishonesty and to propose solutions. In this respect, factors constituting academic dishonesty, the prevalence of academic dishonesty, academic dishonesty facilitated through ICT and precautions to be taken are discussed.

Özet

İnternet, bir yandan bilimin gelişmesine katkıda bulunurken diğer yandan da usulsüz davranışların ortaya çıkmasına zemin hazırlamaktadır. Yapılan araştırmalar İnternet’in akademik usulsüzlüğü tetiklediğini, desteklediğini ve yaygınlaştırdığını göstermektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı İnternet’le kolaylaşan akademik usulsüzlük (e-usulsüzlük) kavramını derinlemesine ele alarak ortaya çıkabilecek durumlara ilişkin farkındalık bilinci oluşturmak ve çözüm önerileri geliştirmektir. Bu bağlamda akademik usulsüzlük kapsamı içerisine giren alt boyutlar, akademik usulsüzlüğün yaygınlığı, BİT ile gelişen e-usulsüzlük kavramı ve bu konuda alınabilecek önlemler tartışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAHİN, M. C., KILIÇER, K., ŞENDAĞ, S., AKBULUT, Y., BİRİNCİ, G., ODABAŞI, H. F. (2022). Academic Dishonesty: Getting Easier with Internet and ICT. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 503–518. https://ajindex.com/articles/439048

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Antion, D. L., ve Michael, W. B. (1983). Short-Term Predictive Validity of Demographic, Affective, Personal, and Cognitive Variables in Relation to Two Criterion Measures of Cheating Behaviors. Educational and Psychological Measurement 43, 467-482.
  2. Austin, M. J. ve Brown, L. D. (1999). Internet Plagiarism: Developing Strategies to Curb Student Academic Dishonesty. The Internet and Higher Education 2(1), 21-33. BEK, (2003). Bilim Etiği Kılavuzu. Anadolu Üniversitesi: Eskişehir. http://www.anadolu.edu.tr/tr/bilimsel/bek.pdf (Erişim tarihi: 07.07.2006).
  3. Birinci, G. ve Odabaşı, H. F. (2006). Akademik Çalışmalarda İnternet Kullanımı: Etik Bunun Neresinde?. VI. International Educational Technology Conference 1, 289-295.
  4. Gazimağusa, KKTC, 19-21 Nisan 2006.
  5. Bricault, D. (1998). Legal Aspects of Academic Dishonesty: Policies, Perceptions, and Realities. North Park University. http://www.npcts.edu/esl/dishnst.html (Erişim tarihi: 07.07.2006).
  6. Carey, S. F. (2003). Combating Plagiarism. Phi Delta Kappa Fastbacks, 514, 7-32.
  7. Crawford A. ve Juday K. (1999). Academic Dishonesty and Internet Use at UNC. http://www.unc.edu/~bmize/teaching/english_12/academic_dishonesty/craw-ford&juday.html (Erişim tarihi: 07.07.2006).
  8. Crown, D. F., ve Spiller, M. S. (1998). Learning From the Literature on Collegiate Cheating: A Review of Empirical Research. Journal of Business Ethics 17, 683-700.
  9. DeVoss, D. ve Rosati, A. (2002).
  10. It Wasn't Me, Was It?: Plagiarism and the Web. Computers and Composition, 19, 191-203.
  11. Ercegovac Z. ve Richardson, J. V. (2004).
  12. Academic Dishonesty, Plagiarism Included, in the Digital Age: A Literature Review. College & Research Libraries, 65, 4. http://www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlpubs/crljournal/crl2004/july/ercegovac.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 07.07.2006).
  13. Flynn R. S. (2003). Confronting Academic Dishonesty In The Accounting Classroom: A Cultural Experience, Accounting Education, 12(4), 437–439.
  14. Gerdeman, D. R. (2000). Academic Dishonesty and the Community College. ERIC Clearinghouse for Community Colleges Los Angeles CA (ED447840). Hansen, B. (2003). Combating Plagiarism. CQ Researcher, 13(32), 773-796. http://www.cqpress.com/docs/Combating%20Plagiarism.pdf (Erişim tarihi: 07.07.2006).
  15. Houghton, P. M. ve Heberling, M. E. (2006). Academic Dishonesty and the World Wide Web. Student Affairs Online, 7(1). http://studentaffairs.com/ejournal/win- ter%5F2006/AcademicDishonesty.html (Erişim tarihi: 26.04.2006).
  16. Isserman, M. (2003). Plagiarism: A Lie of the Mind. Chronicle of H