Journals / Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Measurment of liquidity effect from the view of the efficiency of monetary policies in Turkey

Türkiye'de para politikalarının etkinliği açısından likidite etkisinin ölçülmesi

Pages
99–122
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Interest rates were examined in terms of a dynamic response to a shock in monetary policies, currency in circulation, free reserves and differentmonetarymeasures likeM1 andM2.According to the results of the estimates, the reaction of the interest rates to a shock applied to free reserves and M1 in an increasing trend was negative.When the impact of themonetary shock on the othermacro economic variables were examined, theoretical expectationsmostly came true.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:When deciding the monetary policies they implement, central banks have to take into account the interaction between the monetary dynamics and the interest rates.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aims to examine the effectiveness of the monetary program between 1990:1-2007:3 period that the TurkishCentralBank has implemented bymeasuring the liquidity effect in Turkey, bymeans ofVARmethodology.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Interest rates were examined in terms of a dynamic response to a shock in monetary policies, currency in circulation, free reserves and differentmonetarymeasures likeM1 andM2.According to the results of the estimates, the reaction of the interest rates to a shock applied to free reserves and M1 in an increasing trend was negative.When the impact of themonetary shock on the othermacro economic variables were examined, theoretical expectationsmostly came true.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

When deciding the monetary policies they implement, central banks have to take into account the interaction between the monetary dynamics and the interest rates. Therefore, the investigation of liquidity effect will help which monetary policy tolls should be used in what ways in order to reach the macroeconomic targets of the country in question. This study aims to examine the effectiveness of the monetary program between 1990:1-2007:3 period that the TurkishCentralBank has implemented bymeasuring the liquidity effect in Turkey, bymeans ofVARmethodology. The model enables us to examine the liquidity effect and not only helps to evaluate the effectiveness of the monetary policy but also examines the relationship between the monetary measures used in the implementation of monetary policies and the other macro variables. . Interest rates were examined in terms of a dynamic response to a shock in monetary policies, currency in circulation, free reserves and differentmonetarymeasures likeM1 andM2.According to the results of the estimates, the reaction of the interest rates to a shock applied to free reserves and M1 in an increasing trend was negative.When the impact of themonetary shock on the othermacro economic variables were examined, theoretical expectationsmostly came true.

Özet

Merkez bankaları uygulayacakları para politikasına karar verirken ülkedeki parasal dinamiklerin faizlerle olan etkileşimini göz önünde bulundurmak durumundadırlar. Bu etkileşimden yola çıkarak likidite etkisinin araştırılması, ülkedeki makro ekonomik hedeflere ulaşılmasında hangi para politikası araçlarının ne şekilde kullanılması gerektiğine yardımcı olacaktır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye’de likidite etkisini ölçerek Türkiye CumhuriyetMerkez Bankasının uyguladığı para programlarının etkinliğini, geliştirilen yapısal VAR modeli aracılığıyla 1990:1-2007:3 dönemi için incelemektir. Geliştirilen model, likidite etkisini incelememize olanak tanıyarak bir yandan para politikasının etkinliğini değerlendirmek, diğer yandan para politikasının yürütülmesinde kullanılan parasal ölçütler ile diğer makro değişkenler arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemek amacıyla kullanılabilmektedir. Faiz oranının, para politikasındaki bir şoka dinamik cevabı, dolaşımdaki nakit, serbest rezervler, M1 ve M2 gibi farklı parasal ölçütler kullanılarakincelenmiştir.Tahminsonuçlarınagöre,serbestrezervlerveM2’yeartışyönündeuygulananbirşokafaiz oranının tepkisi negatif olmuştur. Yaşanan parasal şokun diğer makro ekonomik değişkenler üzerindeki etkisi incelendiğinde teorik beklentilerin çoğunlukla doğrulandığı görülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

DOĞAN, B. (2022). Measurment of liquidity effect from the view of the efficiency of monetary policies in Turkey. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 99–122. https://ajindex.com/articles/438969

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Aiyagari S. R. ve R. A. Braun (1998). “Some Models to Guide Monetary Policymakers”, Carnegie Rochester Conferences Series on Public Policy, Volume 48, June, 1-42. Andrés J., Salido J.D. López ve J. Vallés (2004). “Endogenous Monetary Policy and the Liquidity Effect”, Spanish Economic Review, 6, 2004, 159-178.
  2. Bilan, O. (2005). “In Search of the Liquidity Effect in Ukraine”, Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol. 33, 500-516.
  3. Braun, R.A. (2001). “Searching for the Liquidity Effect of Money”, Yokohama National University, September 6, www.cerge-ei.cz/pdf/events/papers/ 011001_t.pdf, (12.08.2004).
  4. Cagan P. ve A. Gandolfi (1969). “The Lag in Monetary Policy as Implied by the Time Pattern of Monetary Effects on Interest Rates”, American Economic Review, May, Vol. 59 Issue 2, 277-284.
  5. Cagan, P. (1972). “The Channels of Monetary Effects on Interest Rates”, National Bureau of Economic Research, Number 97 General Series. Catalán J. C. H. ve O. L. V. Herrera (2003). “Liquidity Effect or Anticipated Inflation Dominance? Empirical Evidence for Guatemala”, Economic Research Department, Bank of Guatemala. Chen S.-L. ve L.-L. Tsai ve J.-L. Wu (2004). “A Revisit to Liquidity Effects Evidence From a Non- Linear approach”, Journal of Macroeconomics, Volume 26, Issue 3, 391-566.
  6. Christiano L. J. ve M. Eichenbaum (1992). “Liquidity Effects and The Monetary Transmission Mechanism” American Economic Review, Volume: 82, Issue: 2, May, 346-353. Christiano L. J. ve M. Eichenbaum ve C. Evans (1994). "The Effects of Monetary Policy Shocks: Evidence from the Flow of Funds", National Bureau of Economic Research,Working Paper, No: 4699, 1-52.
  7. Christiano, L. J. (1996). "Identification and the Liquidity Effect: A Case Study" Economic Perspectives, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Issue 0, 2-13.
  8. Cochrane, J. H. (1989). “The Return of The Liquidity Effect: A Study of The Short-Run Relation Between Money Growth and Interest Rates”, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, Volume: 7, Issue: 1, January, 75-83.
  9. Cothren R. ve Jeffrey A. Edwards (2007). “Long-Run Money Growth and the Liquidity Effect”, Topics in Macroeconomics, Vol:6, Issue:1, 2006, 1-15.
  10. Crowder, W. J. (1997). “The Liquidity Effect: Identifying Permanent and Transitory Components of Money Growth”, Economics Working Paper, Number 9702001, 1-37.
  11. Eichenbaum M. ve C. L. Evans (1993). "Some Empirical Evidence on the Effects of Monetary Policy Shocks on Exchange Rates" NBER Working Papers, No: 4271, 1-47.
  12. Friedman, M. (1969). "Fa