SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

The relation between the interpersonal relationships and attachment styles of teacher trainees

Öğretmen adaylarının kişilerarası ilişkileri ve bağlanma stilleri arasındaki ilişki

Bahtiyar ÇAPAN ERASLAN
Pages
127–142
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results, it can be stated that secure attachment style predicted nourishing interpersonal relationships, and dismissing attachment style predicted poisoning interpersonal relationships.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this research is to investigate whether the teacher trainees’ attachment styles predict interpersonal relationships.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Two hundres thirty students attending the Faculty of Education, Anadolu University during the Spring Semester of 2007-2008 participated this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results, it can be stated that secure attachment style predicted nourishing interpersonal relationships, and dismissing attachment style predicted poisoning interpersonal relationships.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007-2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this research is to investigate whether the teacher trainees’ attachment styles predict interpersonal relationships. Two hundres thirty students attending the Faculty of Education, Anadolu University during the Spring Semester of 2007-2008 participated this study. The data on the attachment styles were collected by “The Relationship Scale” developed by Griffin and Bartholomew (1994) and adapted to Turkish by Sümer and Güngör (1999). The data on the interpersonal relationships were collected by means of “Interpersonal Relationship Scale” developed by Şahin, Durak and Yasak (1994). The regression analysis. was applied to the data. According to the results, it can be stated that secure attachment style predicted nourishing interpersonal relationships, and dismissing attachment style predicted poisoning interpersonal relationships. The findings achieved in view of the study aim were discussed according to the previous studies and theory.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, öğretmen adaylarının sahip oldukları bağlanma stillerinin kişilerarası ilişkilerini yordayıp yordamadığını ortaya koymaktır. Araştırmaya, 2007-2008 Öğretim Yılı Bahar Döneminde Anadolu Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesinde öğrenim gören 230 öğrenci katılmıştır. Veriler, bağlanma stilleri için Griffin ve Bartholomew (1994) tarafından geliştirilmiş, Sümer ve Güngör (1999) tarafından Türkçe’ye uyarlanmış İlişki Ölçekleri Anketi, kişilerarası ilişkiler için Şahin, Durak ve Yasak (1994) tarafından geliştirilmiş Kişilerarası İlişkiler Ölçeğiyle toplanmıştır. Araştırma bulguları için regresyon analizi yapılmıştır. Analiz sonucunda, güvenli bağlanma stilinin besleyici ilişki tarzını, kayıtsız bağlanma stilinin ise ketleyici ilişki tarzını açıkladığı görülmüştür. Bu çalışmada araştırmanın amacı doğrultusunda elde edilen bulgular, daha önce yapılan çalışmalar ve kuram dikkate alınarak tartışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERASLAN, B. Ç. (2022). The relation between the interpersonal relationships and attachment styles of teacher trainees. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 127–142. https://ajindex.com/articles/438949

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Bartholomew, K. (1990). Avoidance of Intimacy. An Attachment Perspective. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7: 147-178.
  2. Bartholomew, K. ve Horowitz, (1991). Attachment Styles among Young Adults. A Test of a Four Category Model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61: 226-244.
  3. Birch, S. H. ve Ladd, G.W. (1997). The Teacher–Child Relationship and Children’s Early School Adjustment. Journal of School Psychology, 35, 61–79.
  4. Birch, S. H. ve Ladd G W. (1998). Children’s Interpersonal Behaviors and the Teacher-Child Relationship. Developmental Psychology, 35, 61-79.
  5. Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and Loss: Vol. 2 Separation, Anxiety, and Anger. Basic Books. 345-380:New York. Bretherton, I. (1985). Attachment Theory: Retrospect and Prospect. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 50:3–35.
  6. Brooke, C. F. (2006). Self and Relationships: Connecting Intrapersonal and Interpersonal Processes. Vohs, Kathleen D.(Editor). (133-145). (Online). Guilford Publications: New York. (erişim tarihi 15 Ekim 2008) (http://site.ebrary.com/lib/anadolu)
  7. Collins, N. L. ve Read, S. J. (1990).
  8. Adult Attachment, Working Models, and Relationship Quality in Dating Couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58 (4): 644-663.
  9. Çelik, S. (2004). The Effects of an Attachment-Oriented-Psychoeducational-Grouptraining on Improving the Preoccupied Attachment Styles of University Students. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi. ODTU, Ankara.
  10. DeMulder, E. K., Denham, S., Schmidt,M., veMitchell, J. (2000). Q-sortAssessment ofAttachment Security during the Preschool Years: Links from Home to School. Developmental Psychology, 36: 274 – 282. Demirkan, S. (2006). Özel Sektördeki Yöneticilerin ve Çalışanların Bağlanma Stilleri, Kontrol Odağı,İş Doyumu ve Beş Faktör Kişilik Özelliklerinin Araştırılması. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Ankara Ü. Ankara.
  11. Erikson, M.F. ve Pianta, R. (1989).
  12. New Lunchbox, Old Feelings: What Children Bring to School. Early Education and Development, 1, 35-49.
  13. Griffin, D. ve Batholomew, K. (1994). Models of the Self and Other: Fundemental Dimensions Underlying Measures of Adult Attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67: 430-445.
  14. Hazan, C. ve Shaver, P. R. (1987). Romantic Love Conceptualized as an Attachment Process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52: 511–524.
  15. Howes, C. ve Hamilton, C. E. (1992). Children’s Relationships with Child Care Teachers: Stability and Concordance with Parental Attachment. Child