SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3

The relationships of horizontal and vertical individualism & collectivism and money ethic: A comparative study of Turkish and Kyrgyz university students

Yatay ve dikey bireycilik & kolektivizm ile para etiği ilişkisi: Türk ve Kırgız üniversite öğrencileri üzerinde karşılaştırmalı bir araştırma

Mehmet Ferhat ÖZBEK
Pages
23–42
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results showed that high on factor success tended to have high vertical individualism.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study compared people’s of the money ethic and horizontal and vertical individualism & collectivism across Turkish university students studying in Turkey, Turkish university students studying in Kyrgyzstan and Kyrgyz university students.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study also investigates the relationships between horizontal and vertical individualism & collectivism and money ethic.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results showed that high on factor success tended to have high vertical individualism.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study compared people’s of the money ethic and horizontal and vertical individualism & collectivism across Turkish university students studying in Turkey, Turkish university students studying in Kyrgyzstan and Kyrgyz university students. This study also investigates the relationships between horizontal and vertical individualism & collectivism and money ethic. Results showed that high on factor success tended to have high vertical individualism. Results also show that, low on factor budget tended to have high expenditure. Kyrgyz students considered money as evil and symbol of success. Besides, Turkish university students studying in Turkey were more horizontally collectivistic than the Turkish university students studying in Kyrgyzstan and Kyrgyz university students.

Özet

Bu çalışmada Türkiye’de okuyan üniversite öğrencileri, Kırgızistan’da eğitim gören Türk öğrenciler ve Kırgız üniversite öğrencilerinin para etiği, yatay ve dikey bireycilik & kolektivizm eğilimlerinin karşılaştırılmaktadır. Ayrıca çalışmada yatay ve dikey bireycilik & kolektivizm ile para etiği arasındaki ilişkiler incelenmektedir. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre yüksek dikey bireycilik eğilimine sahip olanlar parayı başarının sembolü olarak görmektedirler. Ayrıca, yapılan harcama miktarı arttıkça bütçeye verilen önem azalmaktadır. Kırgız öğrenciler için para hem şeytan olarak hem de başarının sembolü olarak düşünmektedirler. Buna ilave olarak, Türkiye’de eğitim gören Türk öğrencilerin yatay kolektivizm eğilimi, Kırgızistan’da eğitim gören Türk öğrencilerden ve Kırgız öğrencilerden daha yüksek olarak ortaya çıkmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZBEK, M. F. (2022). The relationships of horizontal and vertical individualism & collectivism and money ethic: A comparative study of Turkish and Kyrgyz university students. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3, 23–42. https://ajindex.com/articles/438944

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Abraham, R. (1997). The Relationship of Vertical and Horizontal Individualism and Collectivism to Intrapreneurship and Organizational Commitment, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 18(4): 179–186 Bengtson; V. L. (1975). Generation and Family Effects in Value Socialization, American Sociological Review, Vol. 40(3): 358- 371 Bernardi, R. A. (2006). Associations between Hofstede's Cultural Constructs and Social Desirability Response Bias, Journal of Business Ethics 65(1): 43-53
  2. Burggraeve, R. (1995). The Ethical Meaning of Money in the Thought of Emmanuel Levinas, Ethical Perspectives, 2 (1): 11- 16 Chen, X. ve Li, S. (2005). Cross-National Differences in Cooperative Decision-Making in Mixed- Motive Business Contexts: The Mediating Effect of Vertical and Horizontal Individualism, Journal of International Business Studies, 36: 622-636
  3. Chiou, J. (2001). Horizontal and Vertical Individualism and Collectivism among College Students In The United States, Taiwan, and Argentina, The Journal of Social Psychology, 141(5), 667-678
  4. Costello, A. B. ve Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best Practices in Exploratory Factor Analysis: Four Recommendations for Getting the Most from Your Analysis, Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, (10)7: 1-9
  5. Çukur, C. Ş., De Guzman, M., R. T. ve Carlo G. (2004).
  6. Religiosity, Values, And Horizontal and Vertical Individualism-Collectivism: A Study of Turkey, The United States, And The Philippines, The Journal Of Social Psychology, 144(6): 613-634
  7. Du, L. ve Tang, T. L. (2005). Measurement Invariance across Gender and Major: The Love of Money among University Students in People's Republic of China, Journal of Business Ethics 59: 281-293
  8. Dyne, L. V., Vandewalle, K., Tatiana, L., Michael E. ve Cummings, L. L. (2000).
  9. Collectivism, Propensity to TrustAnd Self- Esteem as Predictors of Organizational Citizenship inANon-Work Setting, Journal Of Organizational Behavior, 21(1): 3- 23 Fitzpatrick; J., S., Feng; D., Crawford, D., Tsorell, G. ve Morgan-Flemıng, B. (2006). Social Values and Self-Disclosure: A Comparison of Chinese Native, Chinese Resident (in U.S.) and North American Spouses, Journal of Comparative Family Studies 37(1): 113-2
  10. Franke, R. H., Hofstede, G. ve Bon, M. H. (1991). Cultural Roots of Economic Performance: A Research Note, Strategic Management Journal, Special Issue: Global Strategy, 12:165- 173, Furnham, A. (1996). Attitudinal Correlates and Demographic Predictors of Monetary Beliefs and Behaviors, Journal of Organizationa