Journals / Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3

Being academian in globalizing world

Küreselleşen dünyada akademisyen olmak

Pages
127–142
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

But because there are a limited number of studies in Turkey, it is hard to localize Turkey’s position in world discussion agenda.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Transformations in scholarship, like in every other discipline, have happened in a globalizing world.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this context, the redefinition or the conceptualization of scholarship has great importance.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:But because there are a limited number of studies in Turkey, it is hard to localize Turkey’s position in world discussion agenda.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Transformations in scholarship, like in every other discipline, have happened in a globalizing world. In this context, the redefinition or the conceptualization of scholarship has great importance. In this study, first with historical transformation happening in higher education, the changing role of the scholarship has been discussed. Scholarship concept and as academic activities teaching, research, social service, and management have been examined. In addition, research-teaching dilemma in academic activities has been mentioned and problems that belong to academic life have been handled. Results of the examined researches showed that scholarship concept is generally related to academic activities. In this context, it has seen that research and teaching activities as a dilemma that occupy academic agenda have three kinds of relationships: positive, negative and no relationship. Besides, it has seen that academicians have been faced varied problems in all over the world. But because there are a limited number of studies in Turkey, it is hard to localize Turkey’s position in world discussion agenda.

Özet

Küreselleşme, her alanda olduğu gibi, akademisyenlik alanında da dönüşümler meydana getirmektedir. Bu bağlamda, akademisyenliğin yeniden tanımlanması veya kavramlaştırılması büyük önem taşımaktadır. Bu çalışmada, öncelikle yükseköğretimde gerçekleşen tarihsel dönüşümlerle akademisyenliğin değişen rolü ele alınmıştır. Akademisyenlik kavramı ile akademisyenlerin gerçekleştirdiği öğretim, araştırma, toplum hizmeti ve yönetim etkinlikleri incelenmiştir. Bununla birlikte akademisyenlerin gerçekleştirdikleri etkinlikler arasında yer alan araştırma ve öğretim ikilemine değinilmiş ve akademik yaşama ait sorunlar ele alınmıştır. İncelenen çalışmalar sonunda akademisyenlik kavramının çoğunlukla akademik etkinliklerle ilişkilendirildiği görülmüştür. Bu bağlamda akademik gündemi meşgul eden bir ikilem olarak görülen araştırma ve öğretim etkinlikleri arasında pozitif, negatif ve sıfır ilişki olmak üzere üç farklı ilişkinin olduğu görülmüştür. Bunların yanı sıra dünya genelinde akademisyenlerin çeşitli sorunlarla karşı karşıya oldukları görülmüştür. Ancak Türkiye’de bu konuda gerçekleştirilmiş çok az sayıda çalışma bulunduğu için, Türkiye’nin dünyada meydana gelen bu tartışmalardaki yerinin belirlenmesinin zorlaştığı görülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇANKAYA, S., İZMİRLİ, S., ODABAŞI, F., MISIRLI, Z. A., FIRAT, M. (2022). Being academian in globalizing world. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3, 127–142. https://ajindex.com/articles/438928

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Allen M. (1996). Research productivity and positive teaching evaluations: examining the relationship using meta-analysis. Journal of the Association for Communication Administration (JACA), 2, 77-96.
  2. Anderson D., Johnson. R. ve Saha, L. (2002). Changes in academic work: implications for universities of the changing age distribution and work roles of academic staff. Canberra: Department of Education, Science and Training. Barkhuizen, E.N., Rothman, S. ve Tytherleigh, M.Y. (2004). Burnout of academic staff in a higher education institution. Paper presented at the second South African Wellness Conference, North- West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa, 17 September 2004.
  3. Bates, H. ve Frohlich, C. (2000). The relationship between research productivity and teaching effectiveness of finance faculty. Journal of Business Education, 1, 39. Boyer, E.L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate, Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Princeton, NJ. ERIC- ED326149. Braccia, J. (1994). The customer-driven classroom. The Teaching Professor, 8 (7), 5-6.
  4. Braxton, J.M. (1996). Contrasting perspectives on the relationship between teaching and research. New Directions for Institutional Research, 90, 5–15.
  5. Carroll, V. S. (2003). The teacher, the scholar, the self: Fitting thinking and writing into a four–four load. College Teaching, 51(1), 22–26.
  6. Deem, R. ve L. Lucas (2007). Research and teaching cultures in two contrasting uk policy contexts: Academic life in education departments in five English and Scottish universities. The Journal of Higher Education, 54, 115-133.
  7. Erdem, A.R. (2006). Dünyadaki yükseköğretimin değişimi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 15, 299-314. Erdem,A.R. (2008). Öğretim üyesi akademisyen midir?, bilim adamı mıdır? Akademik Dizayn Dergisi, 2 (2), 83-85.
  8. Etzkowitz, H. (2004). The evolution of the entrepreneurial university. International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, 1 (1), 64-77.
  9. Feldman, K. (1987). Research productivity and scholarly accomplishment of college teachers as related to their instructional effectiveness. Research in Higher Education, 26, 227–291.
  10. Fox, M. F. (1992). Research, teaching, and publication productivity: Mutuality versus competition in academia. Sociology of Education, 65, 293–305.
  11. Giddens, A. (1999). Küreselleşmenin İkilemleri. Sosyal Demokrat Değişim Dergisi, 56. Gillespie, N.A., Walsh, M., Winefield, A.H., Dua, S.J. ve Stough, C. (2001). Occupational