Journals / Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2

The impact of trade and financial openness on economic growth in Turkey: A survey on the 1992-2006 period

Türkiye'de ticari ve finansal dışa açıklığın büyümeye etkisi: 1992-2006 dönemi üzerine bir inceleme

Pages
69–80
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, Toda – Yamamoto causality test results show that there is a bi-directional causality between trade openness and economic growth and the impact of financial openness on economic growth is insignificant.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper examines the long run impact of trade and financial openness on economic growth in Turkey for the 1992-2006 period by using the Bounds test approach proposed by Pesaran, Shin and Smith (2001) based on Unrestricted Error Correction Model and Toda ve Yamamoto’s (1995) causality test.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Empirical results from the Bounds test indicate there exist a long run relationship between trade and financial openness and economic growth in Turkey .
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, Toda – Yamamoto causality test results show that there is a bi-directional causality between trade openness and economic growth and the impact of financial openness on economic growth is insignificant.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This paper examines the long run impact of trade and financial openness on economic growth in Turkey for the 1992-2006 period by using the Bounds test approach proposed by Pesaran, Shin and Smith (2001) based on Unrestricted Error Correction Model and Toda ve Yamamoto’s (1995) causality test. Empirical results from the Bounds test indicate there exist a long run relationship between trade and financial openness and economic growth in Turkey . In addition, Toda – Yamamoto causality test results show that there is a bi-directional causality between trade openness and economic growth and the impact of financial openness on economic growth is insignificant.

Özet

Bu çalışma, Türkiye’de ticari ve finansal dışa açılmanın ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki uzun dönem etkisini 1992-2006 dönemleri için Pesaran, Shin ve Smith (2001) tarafından ileri sürülmüş, kısıtsız hata düzeltme modeline dayanan sınır testi yaklaşımı ve Toda ve Yamamoto (1995) nedensellik testi ile araştırmaktadır. Sınır testinden elde edilen ampirik sonuçlar, Türkiye’de ticari ve finansal dışa açıklık ile ekonomik büyüme arasında uzun dönem ilişkisi olduğuna işaret etmektedir. Toda - Yamamoto nedensellik testi sonuçları ise ticari dışa açıklık ile ekonomik büyüme arasında çift yönlü bir nedensellik ilişkisi olduğunu ve finansal dışa açıklığın ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki etkisinin anlamsız olduğunu göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KIRAN, B., GÜRİŞ, B. (2022). The impact of trade and financial openness on economic growth in Turkey: A survey on the 1992-2006 period. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2, 69–80. https://ajindex.com/articles/438896

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. Aizenman, J. (2004b). On The Hidden Links Between Financial and Trade Opening. NBER Working Paper 9906: 1-25.
  2. Anoruo, E. ve Ahmad, Y. ( 1997). Openness and Economic Growth: Evidence From Selected ASEAN Countries. The Indian Economic Journal 47: 110-117.
  3. Arestis, P. ve Demetriades, P. (1997). Financial Dvelopment and Economic Growth: Assessing the Evidence. The Economic Journal 107: 783-99.
  4. Atamtürk, B. (2007). Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerde ve Türkiye’de Finansal Serbestleşmenin İç Tasarruflar Üzerine Etkisi. Marmara Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi 23: 75-89.
  5. Bhala, S. ve Lau, L.J. (1991).
  6. Openness, Technological Progress, and Economic Growth in Developing Countries. Background Paper for World Development Report. Coe, D., Helpman, E. ve Hoffmaister, A. (1997). North-South R&D Spillovers. Economic Journal 107: 134-149.
  7. Diaz-Alejandro, C. (1985).
  8. Goodbye Financial Repression, Hello Financial Repression. Journal of Development Economics 19: 1-24.
  9. Edison, H.J., Levine, R., Ricci, L.A. ve Slok, T. (2002). International Financial Integration and Economic Growth. Journal of International Money and Finance 21: 749-776.
  10. Edwards, S. (1997).
  11. Openness, Productivity and Growth: What Do We Really Know?. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper. http://papers.nber.org/papers/w5978.
  12. Edwards, S. ve Wijnbergen, V. (1986). The Welfare Effects of Trade and Capital Market Liberalization. International Economic Review 27: 141-148.
  13. Elliot, G., Rothenberg, T.J. ve Stock, J.H. (1996). Efficient Tests for an Autoregressive Unit Root. Econometrica 64: 813-836.
  14. Engle, R.F. ve Granger, C.W.J. (1987). Cointegration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation and Testing. Econometrica 55: 251-276.
  15. Frankel, J. ve Romer, D. (1996). Trade and Growth: An Empirical Investigation. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper. http://papers.nber.org/papers/w5476.
  16. Ghali, K. (1999). Financial Development and Economic Growth: The Tunisian Experience. Review of Development Economics 3: 310-322.
  17. Ghatak, S., Milner, C. ve Utkulu, U. (1995). Trade Liberalization and Endogenous Growth: Some Evidence For Turkey. Economics of Planning 28: 147-167.
  18. Grilli, V. ve Milesi-Ferretti, G.M. (1995). Economic Effects and Structural Determinants of Capital Controls. IMF Staff Papers 42: 517-551.
  19. Grossman, G.M. ve Helpman, E. (1991). Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Boston, MIT Press.
  20. Güloğlu, B. ve Altunoğlu, A.E. (2002). Finansal Serbestleşme Politikaları ve Finansal Krizler: Latin Amerika,