Journals / Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 4

A two-phase model for strategic decision making: Activation of scenarios with cognitive maps and an application on automotive industry

Stratejik karar almada iki aşamalı bir model: Senaryoların bilişsel haritalar ile etkinleştirilmesi ve Otomotiv Endüstrisinde bir uygulama

Pages
85–100
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Also this study is supported by an application on future of automotive industry.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In recent years, using different decision making methods has become a requirement in decision making processes which have high uncertainty and variability.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study is to suggest an usage of scenario analysis and cognitive maps together in strategic decision making process, by this modeling, offer a structure for the qualitative scenario texts by cognitive maps and establish a hierarchical structure with targets, strategies, actions which will give input to the decision making process.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Also this study is supported by an application on future of automotive industry.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In recent years, using different decision making methods has become a requirement in decision making processes which have high uncertainty and variability. The aim of this study is to suggest an usage of scenario analysis and cognitive maps together in strategic decision making process, by this modeling, offer a structure for the qualitative scenario texts by cognitive maps and establish a hierarchical structure with targets, strategies, actions which will give input to the decision making process. Also this study is supported by an application on future of automotive industry.

Özet

Son yıllarda karar alma süreçlerinde görülen yüksek derecedeki belirsizlik ve değişkenlik, farklı karar alma metotlarının birlikte kullanımını gerekli hale getirmiştir. Bu çalışmada, stratejik karar alma sürecini desteklemede senaryo analizi ve bilişsel haritaların birlikte kullanımı önerilmektedir. Bu modelleme ile senaryo analizi sonucunda elde edilen nitel senaryo metinlerinin bilişsel haritalar yoluyla yapılandırılması, yorumlanması ve karar alma sürecine girdi oluşturacak; hedefler, stratejiler, aksiyonlardan oluşan hiyerarşik yapının kurulması amaçlanmaktadır. Çalışma, Otomotiv Endüstrisinin geleceğine ilişkin bir uygulama ile desteklenmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖKAY, G. E., KABAK, C., SARAÇ, M. (2022). A two-phase model for strategic decision making: Activation of scenarios with cognitive maps and an application on automotive industry. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 4, 85–100. https://ajindex.com/articles/438882

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Ackermann, F., Cropper, S., Cook, J. And Eden, C, (1992). Getting Started With Cognitive Mapping. 7th Or Conference, University Of Warwick, 13h-15th April, ss. 65-82
  2. Axelrod, R. (1976). Structure of Decision: The Cognitive Maps of Political Elities. Priceton University Press.
  3. Beck, P.W. (1982). Corporate Planning for an uncertain future. Long Range Planning.15(1): 12-21
  4. Bood, R.P. and Postma, T.J.B.M. (1998). Scenario analysis as a strategic management tool. Research report SOM 9805, University of Groningen. Carbonara, N. and Scozzi, B. (2006). Cognitive Maps to Analyze New Product Development Processes: A Case Study.Technovation, 26:1233-1243
  5. Casey, P J.(2002). Remembering what we do, not what we view: The plasticity of everyday cognitive maps. Australian Journal of Psychology, 54(1):, 8- 16 Calori R, Johnson G, Sarnin P. (1994). CEOs’ Cognitive Maps and the Scope of the Organization. Strategic Management Journal, 15 /6:. 437-457)
  6. Checkland, P. (1981).
  7. Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. John Wiley & Sons. Chichester. Chen J.L. and Stanney K.M. (1999). A theoretical model of way finding in virtual environments: Proposed strategies for navigational aiding. Presence, 8(6):671-685
  8. Chermack, T.J. (2004). A Theoretical Model of Scenario Planning. Human Resource Development Review. 3(4): 301-325
  9. Clarke, I. and Mackaness, W. (2001). Management Intuition: An Interpretative Account of Structure and Content of Decision Schemas Using Cognitive Maps. Journal of Management Studies. 38 (2), 147-172
  10. Cornelius, P., Van de Putte, A., Romani, M. (2005). Three Decades of Scenario Planning in Shell, California Management Review. 48(1): 92-109
  11. Crowther, K.G. and Y.Y. Haimes, (2008),
  12. Scenario Analysis, Cognitive Maps And Concept Maps. Forthcoming In Wiley Handbook Of Science And Technology Of Homeland Security, Wiley. Damodaran, A., (2007), Strategic Risk Taking- A Framework For Risk Management, Wharton School Publishing. Diffenbach, J. (1993). Influence Diagrams for Complex Strategic Issues. Strategic Management Journal. 3: 133-146.
  13. Eden, C. (2004). Analyzing cognitive maps to help structure issues or problems. European Journal of Operational Research. 159 (3): 3673-68
  14. Hodgkinson, G.P., Bown, N.J., Maule, A.J., Glaister, K.W., Pearman, A.D. (1999), Breaking The Frame: An Analysis of Strategic Cognition and Decision Making Under Uncertainty. Strategic Management Journal, 20(10): 977-985
  15. Hong, T. and Han, I., (2002). Knowledge Based Data Mining of News Information on the Inte