SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 2

Examining consumers’ evaluations of the brands’ functional, symbolic, and experiential benefits

Markaların “işlevsel, sembolik ve deneyimsel” yararlarına ilişkin tüketici değerlendirmelerinin incelenmesi

Eyup AKIN
Mutlu UYGUN
Pages
107–122
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Through the results it is not only provided clues both to the literature and to enterprises or brand managers, but also led to develop various proposals.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This research is conducted to determine whether the products’ and the brands’ functional, symbolic and experiential benefit dimensions differentiate in terms of consumers’ evaluation or not.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Analysis of the data gathered by an appropriate scale from a sample which is consisted of Aksaray University students, indicated that the consumers’ brand and product evaluations differentiate in terms of benefit dimensions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Through the results it is not only provided clues both to the literature and to enterprises or brand managers, but also led to develop various proposals.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This research is conducted to determine whether the products’ and the brands’ functional, symbolic and experiential benefit dimensions differentiate in terms of consumers’ evaluation or not. Analysis of the data gathered by an appropriate scale from a sample which is consisted of Aksaray University students, indicated that the consumers’ brand and product evaluations differentiate in terms of benefit dimensions. Through the results it is not only provided clues both to the literature and to enterprises or brand managers, but also led to develop various proposals.

Özet

Bu araştırma, tüketicilerin değerlendirmeleri açısından ürün ve markaların işlevsel, sembolik ve deneyimsel yarar boyutlarının farklılaşıp-farklılaşmadığını belirlemek amacıyla yürütülmüştür. Aksaray Üniversitesi’ndeki öğrencilerden oluşan bir örneklemden, amaca uygun oluşturulan bir ölçek yoluyla toplanan veriler, tüketicilerin ürün ve markalara yönelik değerlendirmelerinin bu yarar boyutları açısından farklılaştığına işaret etmektedir. Sonuçlar yoluyla, gerek alanyazına gerekse işletmelere ya da marka yöneticilerine önemli ipuçları sağlamanın yanında, çeşitli öneriler de geliştirilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKIN, E., UYGUN, M. (2022). Examining consumers’ evaluations of the brands’ functional, symbolic, and experiential benefits. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 2, 107–122. https://ajindex.com/articles/438878

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Aaker, J. L. (1997). Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research 34 (3): 347-356.
  2. Allen, M. W. ve Ng, S. H. (1999). The direct and indirect influences of human values on product ownership. Journal of Economic Psychology 20: 5-39.
  3. Arnould, M. J. ve Reynolds, K. E. (2003). Hedonic shopping motivations. Journal of Retailing 79: 77-95.
  4. Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R. ve Griffin, M. (1994). Work and / or fun: measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. Journal of Consumer Research 20 (4): 644- 656 Bagozzi, R. P., Gopinath, M. ve Nyer, P. U. (1999). The role of emotions in marketing. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science 27: 184-206.
  5. Bauman, Z. (2001).
  6. The Individualized Society, Polity: Cambridge. Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research 15: 139-168
  7. Bhat, S. ve Reddy, S. K. (1998). Symbolic and functional positioning of brands. Journal of Consumer Marketing 15 (1): 32-43.
  8. Bloch, P. H., Ridgway, N. M. ve Nelson, J. E. (1991). Leisure and the Shopping Mall. Advances in Consumer Research 18: 445-452.
  9. Bloch, P. H., Ridgway, N. M. ve Sherrell, D. L. (1989). Extending the concept of shopping: an investigation of browsing activity. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 17: 13-21.
  10. Brakus, J. (2001). A Theory of Consumer Experiences. Columbia University: Columbia. Brembeck, H. ve Ekstrom, K. (2004). Elusive Consumption. Berg Publishers:
  11. Oxford. Campbell, C. (1995). The Sociology of Consumption. Acknowledging Consumption, Ed.: D. Miller, 105–122. Routledge: London. Campbell, R. M., Jr,. (2002). Measuring Consumers Evaluations of the Functional, Symbolic and Experiential of Brands. University of Oregon: Oregon. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). The costs and benefits of consuming. Journal of Consumer Research 27 (2): 267-272.
  12. Davies, A. ve Elliot, R. (2006). The evolution of the empowered consumer. European Journal of Marketing 40, (9/10): 1106-1121.
  13. Deighton, J. (1992). The consumption of performance. Journal of Consumer Research 19: 362-372.
  14. Desbarats, G. (1995). Usability: from that says function. Industrial Management & Data Systems 95 (5): 3-6.
  15. Doran, K. B. (1997). Symbolic consumption in China: the color television as a life statement. Advances in Consumer Research 24: 128-131.
  16. Elliott, R. ve Wattanasuwan, K. (1998). Brands as resources for the symbolic construction of identity. International Journal of Advertising 17 (2): 131-144.
  17. Fırat, A. F. ve Dholakia, N. (2003). Consuming People: From Political