Journals / Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 4

Comparative analysis of the effects of Basel II Accord on Turkish and EU banking sectors with SWOT-AHP model

Basel II düzenlemelerinin Türk ve AB Bankacılık sektörü üzerine etkilerinin SWOT-AHP modeli ile karşılaştırmalı analizi

Pages
133–150
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Some policies and strategies have been suggested for the beneficial and correct implementation of Basel II to Turkish banking sector.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Basel Accords in banking have been the most important regulatory structures shaping and regulating global financial system since 1988.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Making international financial standards to regulate the functioning of international money and financial systems has been the common effort of developed countries in the last 20 years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Some policies and strategies have been suggested for the beneficial and correct implementation of Basel II to Turkish banking sector.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Basel Accords in banking have been the most important regulatory structures shaping and regulating global financial system since 1988. Making international financial standards to regulate the functioning of international money and financial systems has been the common effort of developed countries in the last 20 years. Until today, all of the academic work on the effects of Basel II regulations has dealt with the effects of the criterias one by one on a single basis. Particularly, we have not found any work examining the effects of Basel II regulation as a whole and in a comparative way. For this reason, in this study, while the potential effects of Basel II regulations on Turkish Banking sector have been considered with a comprehensive point of view, at the same time those potential effects have been comparatively analyzed with the effects of Basel II rules on EU banking sector. In the study SWOT-AHP methodology has been used. Some policies and strategies have been suggested for the beneficial and correct implementation of Basel II to Turkish banking sector.

Özet

Bankacılıkta Basel uzlaşıları, 1988’den bu yana global finansal sistemi şekillendiren ve düzenleyen en önemli yapılar olmuşlardır. Uluslararası para ve finans sisteminin işleyişini regüle edecek genel kabul görmüş birfinansal düzenleme son yirmi yıldır dünyanın gelişmiş ülkelerinin ortak çabası olmuştur. Bugüne kadar BaselUzlaşılarının etkilerini konu alan çalışmaların tümü Basel Uzlaşısının içerisinde genellikle tek tek kriterlerin etkileri üzerinde durmuştur. Özellikle Uzlaşının etkilerini bir bütün olarak ele alan aynı zamanda karşılaştırmalı olarak inceleyen bir çalışmaya rastlanmamıştır. Bundan dolayı, çalışmamızda Basel II Uzlaşısının TürkBankacılık sektörüne muhtemel etkileri bütünsel bir bakış açısıyla ele alınırken aynı zamanda Avrupa Birliğibankacılık sektörü üzerine Basel II’nin etkileri ile karşılaştırmalı olarak analiz edilmiştir. Çalışmada SWOT-AHP modeli kullanılmıştır. Basel II Uzlaşısının TürkBankacılık sektörüne uygulanması esnasında izlenebilecek strateji ve politikalar önerilmeye çalışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOPAL, H., AFŞAR, M. (2022). Comparative analysis of the effects of Basel II Accord on Turkish and EU banking sectors with SWOT-AHP model. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 4, 133–150. https://ajindex.com/articles/438798

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Andersen, H. (2011).Procyclical implications of Basel II: Can the cyclicality of capital requirements be contained? Journal of Financial Stability, 7 (3), 138- 154. Antao, P. and Lacerda, A. (2011). Capital requirements under the credit risk-based framework. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35 (6), 1380-1390.
  2. Artus, P. (2005). De Bâle 1 à Bâle 2: Effets sur le marché du crédit. Revue économique. 56 (1), 77-97. Bank of International Settlements [BIS] (2008). BIS Review 53/2008,
  3. Speech by Dr Nout Wellink, President of the Netherlands Bank and Chairman of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, at the 36th Economics Conference 2008, held at the Austrian National Bank, Vienna, 28 April 2008. (http://www.bis.org/review/r080430a.pdf Erişim Tarihi: 15.03.2010)
  4. Barnes, S. et al. (2010). Minimising risks for imbalances in European banking. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 828, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5km33srnz5nt-en, (Erişim Tarihi: 15.07.2011)
  5. Barrell, R. et al. (2010). Bank regulation, property prices and early warning systems for banking crises in OECD countries. Journal of Banking & Finance,34, 2255-2264
  6. Barth, J.R. et al. (2008). Reassessing the rationale and practice of bank regulation and supervision after Basel II. In Current Developments in Monetary and Financial Law. Washington:IMF Publications. Benink, H. A., Schmidt, R. H.(2004). Europe’s single market for financial services: views by the European Shadow Financial Regulatory Committee. Journal of Financial Stability, 1, 157-198.
  7. Blundell-Wignall, A. ve Atkinson, P. (2010). Thinking beyond Basel III: Necessary Solutions for Capital and Liquidity. OECD Journal: Financial Market Trends, 1, 1-23
  8. Borio, C. and Zhu, H. (2008). Capital regulation, risk taking and monetary policy: a missing link in the transmision mechanism?. BIS Working Papers, 268, Basel: BIS pub. Cheng, E., Li, H. (2002). Construction partnering process and associated critical success factors. Journal of Management Engineering, 18,194-202.
  9. Chiu, Y.H. et al. (2009). Basel II and bank bankruptcy analysis, Applied Economics Letters, 16, (18), 1843- 1847 Chorafas, D.N. (2004).Economic capital allocation with Basel II: Cost, benefit and implementation procedures. Great Britain: Elsevier Pub Chortareas, G.E. et al. (2010). Bank supervision, regulation and efficiency: Evidence from the European Union. Conference Paper presented at European Economics and Finance Society 9th Annual Conference 3th-6th June 2010,Athens,Gree