Journals / Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2

Economic constitution of Turkey and three major topics

Türkiye’de ekonomik anayasa ve üç önemli konu

Pages
71–90
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Ensuring transparency for economic and financial issues, being able to monitor economic management, and making it accountable is extremely important for preventing fraud in the economy as well as helping democracy settle in.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Abstract: The most important civil constitution creating process since the establishment of the Republic of Turkey is still ongoing.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Economic and financial provisions of our 1982 constitution are not one; in fact they are all over the place.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Ensuring transparency for economic and financial issues, being able to monitor economic management, and making it accountable is extremely important for preventing fraud in the economy as well as helping democracy settle in.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Abstract: The most important civil constitution creating process since the establishment of the Republic of Turkey is still ongoing. Economic and financial provisions of our 1982 constitution are not one; in fact they are all over the place. There is an “Economic and Financial Provision” heading under the constitution; however, it is extremely inadequate. The 1982 Constitution is not a constitution in which financial and economic provisions are listed under one section. There has never been an interest to create an Economic Constitution in Turkey until today. The same can be said for the European Union in the past. The Treaty of Maastricht (Treaty of the European Union), which came into force on 1st November 1993, sets the main outline for the fundamental elements (. The Treaty of Maastricht (Treaty of the European Union) on which an economic constitution should be based on. It is extremely important to set binding provisions for the economy under constitutions, especially in a world that is becoming global and where economic crisis is a major issue, as it has become a familiar scene that democratic governments tend to oversee economic rules. In the event that governments are majority voters in the legislative organ, it is easy to oversee such rules. If the basic principles required for a well-operated economy are incorporated into the constitution, nobody can step outside the set rules. Ensuring transparency for economic and financial issues, being able to monitor economic management, and making it accountable is extremely important for preventing fraud in the economy as well as helping democracy settle in.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARLUK, S. R. (2022). Economic constitution of Turkey and three major topics. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2, 71–90. https://ajindex.com/articles/438794

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Acar, İ. A. (2001). “Türkiye İçin Açık Bütçe mi? Denk Bütçe mi?,” Yeni Türkiye Ekonomik Kriz Özel Sayısı 7(2): 1393-1422.
  2. Akalın, G. (1994). Anayasamızın Piyasa Ekonomisi ile Uyumlaştırılması: Mali ve Ekonomik Hükümler ile Sosyal ve Ekonomik Hak ve Ödevlerin Yeniden Düzenlenmesi. Anayasa Yargısı, Anayasa Mahkemesi’nin 32. Kuruluş Yıldönümü Nedeniyle Düzenlenen Sempozyumda Sunulan Bildiriler (11): 71-78. http://www.anayasa.gov.tr/files/pdf/anayasa_yargisi/anyarg11/gakalin.pdf (erişim tarihi 23 Haziran 2012).
  3. Akalın, G. (1997). Ekonomik Demokratikleşme: Piyasa Ekonomisine Geçiş ve Anayasal İktisat, Liberal Düşünce 6(1): 13- 22. Aktan, C. C., Dileyici, D. ve Saraç, Ö. (2007). Anayasal İktisat Perspektifinden Pratik Mali Anayasa (Vergi Anayasası) Teklifleri. Kurumsal Maliye Politikası (Ed. C. C. Aktan, D. Dileyici, İ. Y. Vural) içinde Seçkin Yayınları:
  4. Ankara.
  5. Aktan, Ç. C. (1997). Anayasal İktisat. İz Yayınları:
  6. İstanbul.
  7. Aktan, Ç. C. (1999). Anayasal İktisat Felsefesi ve Ekonomik Anayasa Reformuna Yönelik Eleştirilere Cevaplar I. Demokratikleşme ve Yeni Anayasa 11.Ankara: Yeni Türkiye. Avrupa Birliği Bakanlığı, (2011). AB Ekonomik Yönetişim Sisteminde Yeni Dönem. http://www.abgs.gov.tr/files/EMPB/ab_ekonomik_yonetisim_sisteminde_yeni_donem_web.pdf (erişim tarihi 11 Temmuz 2012) Avrupa Parlamentosu, (2012). Türkiye Raporu. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&reference=P7-TA-2012-0116&language=EN&ring=B7-2012-0189 (erişim tarihi 13 Ağustos 2012)
  8. Buchanan, J. M. (1997). The Balanced Budget Amendments: Clarifying the Arguments. Public Choice 90(1):117- 138. Buchanon, J. M. (1986). The Constitution of Economic Policy. http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economics/laureates/1986/buchanan-lecture. html (erişim tarihi 1 Ağustos 2012)
  9. Caniklioğlu, M. D. (1998). Anayasa Arayışları ve Türkiye: Anayasal İktisat Eleştirisi. BDS Yayınları:
  10. İstanbul.
  11. Collignon, S. (2010a). Democratic Requirements for a European Economic Goverment. http://library. fes.de/pdf-files/id/ipa/07710.pdf (erişim tarihi 11 Haziran 2012).
  12. Collignon, S. (2010b). Europe’s Economic Government Or How To Use The Treaty For More Effecti ve Economic Coordination in the Euro Area? European Parliament, IP/A/ECON/FWC/2009_040/C10. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/document/activities/cont/201006/20100610ATT75768/20100610ATT75768EN.pdf (erişim tarihi 3 Ağustos 2012)
  13. Çağan, N. (1992). Anayasal İktisat Olur mu? Milliyet, 03.06.1992. gazetearsivi.milliyet.com.tr/Arsiv/1992/06/03 (erişim tarihi 8