SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 4

The Leadership Competencies of Prof. Yılmaz Büyükerşen as the Chancellor of Anadolu University

Prof. Dr. Yılmaz Büyükerşen’in Liderlik Yeterlilikleri Anadolu Üniversitesi Rektölüğü Döneminde

Basil OKOTH
Pages
133–143
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicate that Prof.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Transformational, charismatic, visionary!
📊
Key Findings & Data:Yılmaz’s leadership competencies according to Dulewicz and Higgs (2006) framework.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicate that Prof.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Transformational, charismatic, visionary! These are some of terms that have been popularized as the prescription for successful leadership. A leader does not have to check all the boxes to be considered successful, Prof. Yılmaz did, however. The study interviewed four participants who worked under Prof. Yılmaz as the chancellor as Anadolu university to examine their perception of Prof. Yılmaz’s leadership competencies according to Dulewicz and Higgs (2006) framework. The results indicate that Prof. Yılmaz performed highly on all competencies considered and inspired a lasting mark of loyalty and commitment and admiration among his followers and peers. His ability to comprehend the emotions of his followers and his will to communicate to their feelings helped endear him to his staff. Creating a vision and formulating a strategy to reach it, then (backed with the requisite resources) being capable of communicating this vision to an empowered workforce is the total summary of Prof. Yılmaz’s (and indeed any other leader’s) path to leadership success.

Özet

Dönüşümsel, karizmatik, vizyoner! Bunlar başarılı liderlik için sahip olunması gereken özelliklerden birkaçıdır. Bir lider başarılı olabilmesi için tüm seçenekleri kontrol etmek zorunda değildir ki bununla beraber Prof. Yılmaz Büyükerşen de bu şekilde davranmıştır. Bu çalışmada Dulewicz ve Higgs (2006)’in öne sürmüş olduğu yapıya göre Prof. Yılmaz Büyükerşen’in liderlik yetenekleri Anadolu Üniversitesi rektörüyken onun altında çalışmış olan dört katılımcının algıları incelenerek ele alınmıştır. Sonuçlar Prof. Yılmaz Büyükerşen’in ele alınan tüm yetenekler için yüksek performans gösterdiğini ve onu takip edenler ile akranları açısından sadakat, bağlılık ve hayranlıkta ilham verici biçimde kalıcı iz bıraktığını göstermektedir. Takip edenlerin duygularını anlama yeteneği ve hisleriyle iletişim kurma isteği onu çalışanlarına karşı sevdirmiştir. Vizyon yaratarak buna ulaşmak için bir strateji oluşturma ve (gerekli kaynakların yardımıyla) yetkilendirilmiş işgücüne yönelik bu vizyonla ilişki kurabilme becerisi Prof. Yılmaz Büyükerşen’in (ve diğer liderlerin) liderlik başarısına götüren sürecin bir özetidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

OKOTH, B. (2022). The Leadership Competencies of Prof. Yılmaz Büyükerşen as the Chancellor of Anadolu University. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 4, 133–143. https://ajindex.com/articles/438724

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Astin, A. W. and Astin, H. S. (2000) Leadership Re-considered: Engaging Higher Education in Social Change. Higher Education. Paper 133. Avolio, B. (1999). Full Leadership Development: Bu- ilding the Vital forces in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Bass, B. (1998). Transformational Leadership: Industri-al, Military, and Educational Impact. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Bieranacki, P. and Waldorf, D. (1981). Snowball Samp-ling: Problems and Techniques of Chain Referral Sampling. Sociological Methods & Social Research, 10: 141–163.
  2. Boyatzis, R. E. (1982). The Competent Manager: A Mo-del for Effective Performance, New York, Wiley Boyatzis, R., Goleman, D. and Rhee, K. (2001). Clus-tering Competence in Emotional Intelligence: In-sights from the Emotional Competency Inventory, Unpublished paper. Braun V. and Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analy-sis in Psychology, Qualitative Research in Psycho-logy, 3: 2, 77-101
  3. Burke, W.W. (1988).
  4. Leadership and Empowerment. New York, NY: W. Warren Burke Associates, Inc. Cheng, M.I., Dainty, A.R.J., and Moore, D.R. (2005). What Makes a Good Project Manager? Human Resource Manage J., 15(1):25– 37 Cherkowski, S. (2012). Teacher Commitment in Sustai-nable Learning Communities: A New “Ancient” Story of Educational Leadership. Canadian Journal of Educa-tion / Revue canadienne de l’éducation, 35 (1), pp. 56-68
  5. Dulewiz, V. and Higgs, M. (2006), Assessing Leaders-hip Styles and Organizational Context, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20 (2), pp. 105-123
  6. Geoghegan, L. and Dulewiz, V. (2008). Do Project Mana-gers’ Leadership Competencies Contribute to Project Success? Project Management Journal 39 (4) pp 58-67
  7. Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional Intelligence: Why it can Matter More than IQ. New York, NY: Bantam Books. Gray, J. W. (1973).
  8. Communication and Leadership, The National Association of Secondary School Principals, Washington, D.C Ireland, R. D., and Hitt, O. A. (1999). Achieving and Maintaining Strategic Competitiveness in the 21st Century: The Role of Strategic Leadership, The Academy of Management Executive (1993-2005), 13 (1) Global Competitiveness, Part II, pp. 43-57
  9. Isaacson, W. (2012). The Real Leadership Lessons of Steve Jobs, Harvard Business Review. Jones, S. R., Torres, V., and Arminio, J. (2006). Nego-tiating the Complexities of Qualitative Research in Higher Education: Fundamental Elements and Issu-es, New York: Routledge. Jones, V. and Brazdau, O (2015). Conscious Leaders-hip, a Reciprocal Connected Practice. A Qualita-t