Journals / Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 1

Blurring Boundaries: Facebook Groups as Digital Teachers’ Lounges for ELT Professionals

Bulanıklaşan Sınırlar: İngilizce Öğretmenleri İçin Sanal Zümre Odaları Olarak Facebook Grupları

Pages
251–272
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thus, it could be argued that these groups serve primarily asprofessionally-focused spaces of socialization, like a digital teachers’ lounge where teachers (coming from the samearea of specialty) interact with each other, socialize but also discuss work, give or ask for help on a range ofprofessional, administrative, logistical and administrative matters.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Recent years have witnessed a rapid and widespread proliferation of information technologies and internet-basedapplications and platforms, commonly referred to as social media, which powerfully infused into almost everyaspect of our lives, including teaching, teacher education and professional development.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The two-level analysis adopted lurking as a data collection strategyand thematic content analysis as an analytical lens.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus, it could be argued that these groups serve primarily asprofessionally-focused spaces of socialization, like a digital teachers’ lounge where teachers (coming from the samearea of specialty) interact with each other, socialize but also discuss work, give or ask for help on a range ofprofessional, administrative, logistical and administrative matters.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed a rapid and widespread proliferation of information technologies and internet-basedapplications and platforms, commonly referred to as social media, which powerfully infused into almost everyaspect of our lives, including teaching, teacher education and professional development. Departing from thispremise, the current study provided a systematic analysis of Facebook groups serving as networks of professionaldevelopment for ELT professionals in Turkey. The two-level analysis adopted lurking as a data collection strategyand thematic content analysis as an analytical lens. The macro analysis generated a corpus of these groups (n=55)and investigated how they positioned themselves by analyzing their group size, titles, descriptions and group coverphotos. The micro analysis focused on two of the most influential groups and shed light on the actual activities inthe form of posts occurring in these groups in June 2020 (n=189, n=1,063, respectively, and a total of n=1,252).The two-level analysis indicated that these groups could be defined as utilitarian (predominantly requestinginformation and/or providing supplementary docs, instructional videos, revision tests) and socially-oriented(social exchanges with like-minded colleagues). Thus, it could be argued that these groups serve primarily asprofessionally-focused spaces of socialization, like a digital teachers’ lounge where teachers (coming from the samearea of specialty) interact with each other, socialize but also discuss work, give or ask for help on a range ofprofessional, administrative, logistical and administrative matters.

Özet

Son yıllarda, sosyal medya olarak adlandırılan bilgi teknolojilerinin, internet tabanlı uygulamaların ve platformların öğretim, öğretmen eğitimi ve mesleki gelişim de dahil olmak üzere hayatımızın hemen hemen her alanına hızlı, yaygın ve güçlü bir şekilde nüfuzuna tanıklık etmekteyiz. Bu önermeden yola çıkarak, mevcut çalışma Türkiye'deki İngilizce öğretmenlerine mesleki gelişim ağları olarak hizmet veren Facebook gruplarının sistematik bir analizini yapmayı hedeflemektedir. Bu çalışmada kullanılan iki aşamalı analiz, gözlemlemeyi bir veri toplama stratejisi olarak ve tematik içerik analizini de analitik bir lens olarak benimsemektedir. İlk seviye olan makro analiz, bu grupların (n = 55) üye sayıları, grup isimleri, tanımları ve profil fotoğrafları yoluyla kendilerini nasıl konumlandırdıklarını analiz etmektedir. İkinci seviye olan mikro analiz ise ilgili gruplar arasında seçilen iki farklı grupta 2020 yılı Haziran ayında yapılan paylaşımlara (sırasıyla n=189, n=1063 ve toplam n=1252) odaklanarak grup içi etkinliklere ışık tutmaktadır. İki seviyeli analiz bizlere bu grupların faydacı (çoğunlukla bilgi veya öğretim videoları, revizyon testleri gibi dokümanlar isteme/paylaşma) ve sosyal merkezli (aynı mesleki temele, gündelik gerçekliğe sahip meslektaşlar arasında yapılan sosyal paylaşımlar) olarak tanımlanabileceğini göstermektedir. Bu nedenle, bu grupların, (aynı uzmanlık alanından gelen) öğretmenleri bir araya getiren profesyonel odaklı sosyalleşme alanları ve aynı zamanda mesleki, lojistik ve idari konularda etkileşime girdikleri, tartışma ve paylaşımlar yaptıkları dijital zümre odaları gibi hizmet ettiği sonucuna varılabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SELVİ, A. F. (2022). Blurring Boundaries: Facebook Groups as Digital Teachers’ Lounges for ELT Professionals. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 1, 251–272. https://ajindex.com/articles/438708

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. AERA (2011). Code of Ethics. http://www.aera.net/Portals/38/docs/About_AERA/CodeOfEthics%281%29.pdf
  2. Atmaca, Ç. (2014). To Facebook or not to Facebook? International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 7(6), 183-202. Retrieved from http://www.universitypublications.net/ijas/0706/pdf/P4RS167.pdf
  3. Aydın, S. (2012). A review of research on Facebook as an educational environment. Education Technology Research and Development, 60(6), 1093-1106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-012-9260-7
  4. Balçıkanlı, C. (2015). Facebook in teacher education: Adoption, use and educational use. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 11(3), 82-99. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1086653.pdf
  5. Bedford, L. (2019). Using social media as a platform for a virtual professional learning. community. Online Learning, 23(3), 120-136. https://doi.org10.24059/olj.v23i3.1538
  6. Bernard, C. F., Weiss, L., & Abeles, H. (2018). Space to share: Interactions among music teachers in an online community of practice. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, (215), 75-94. https://doi.org/10.5406/bulcouresmusedu.215.0075
  7. Biçen, H., Özdamlı F., Uzunboylu, H. (2012). Online and blended learning approach on instructional multimedia development courses in teacher education. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(4), 529- 548. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2012.682586
  8. Bissessar, C. S. (2014). Facebook as an informal teacher professional development tool. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(2), 121-135. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v39n2.9
  9. Börekçi, R. & Aydın, S. (2019). Foreign language teachers’ interactions with their students on Facebook. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 4(3), 217-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.12.001
  10. Carpenter, J. P. & Krutka, D. G. (2015). Engagement through microblogging: Educator professional development via Twitter. Professional Development in Education, 41(4), 707-728. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2014.939294
  11. Cinkara, E. & Yalçın Arslan, F. (2017). Content analysis of a Facebook group as a form of mentoring for EFL teachers. English Language Teaching, 10(3), 40-53. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n3p40
  12. Demiraslan Çevik, Y., Çelik, S., & Haşlaman, T. (2014). Teacher training through social networking platforms: A case study on Facebook. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(6), 714-727. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.615
  13. Delen, İ. (2017). Teaching argu