Journals / Anadolu Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi :C-Yaşam Bilimleri ve Biyoteknoloji / 2018 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

OVERVIEW OF 3D TECHNOLOGY APPLICATIONS IN PLANTS: PHENOMIC, MAPPING WITH ROBOTIC SYSTEMS, ARCHITECTURAL DESIGNS, PLANT AND ANIMAL TISSUE CULTURE APPROACHES

BİTKİLERDE 3D TEKNOLOJİSİ UYGULAMALARINA GENEL BAKIŞ: FENOMİK, ROBOTİK SİSTEMLER İLE HARİTALANDIRMA, MİMARİ TASARIMLAR, BİTKİ VE HAYVAN DOKU KÜLTÜRÜ YAKLAŞIMLARI

Pages
239–255
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this article, we had tried to summarize studies about 3D technology on plant systems.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The fact that two-dimensional studies are insufficient about complex plant forms and allowing emerging technologies to give more detailed data leads researchers to search for new alternatives.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Also through computer algorithms which gave 3D structure of plant architectural designs, different products and artworks can be produced.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this article, we had tried to summarize studies about 3D technology on plant systems.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The fact that two-dimensional studies are insufficient about complex plant forms and allowing emerging technologies to give more detailed data leads researchers to search for new alternatives. The developments in plant biotechnology have changed rapidly over the past two decades, depending on the technological progresses such as microscopy, structural and functional plant modelling, phenotyping and genomic studies. Especially the studies which is called “phenomic” and plant researches working with phenotyping, are the popular research areas which interest to the researchers on recent years. Nowadays scientific researches and production techniques in agriculture, have been carried out more stability as digitally and visually. Fast improvements on robotic and sensor technologies come together with agricultural research have been opened up new horizons on agricultural biotechnology, for the plant architecture and even for plant tissues which is an excellent model for many researchers. Along with the phenotyping research on agricultural research, three-dimentional biotechnology is used on detection with robotic sensors and mapping. Also through computer algorithms which gave 3D structure of plant architectural designs, different products and artworks can be produced. The usage of 3D printing technologies to identify the plant tissues structure and function and for improvement of new culture systems to use at plant tissue culture techniques has been an important approach nowadays. Recently, potential of plant forms to be use in scaffold production have been studied because of the micro similarity of plant tissues with animal tissues in animal tissue engineering. Microfluidic systems, mostly used in animal cell culture techniques, are also intensively studied in research related to plant cells. The data obtained by all these techniques are used in many fields ranging from pest control on agriculture to the design of artificial organs on medicine, from the programming of computer games to forestry. In this article, we had tried to summarize studies about 3D technology on plant systems.

Özet

İki boyutlu çalışmaların karmaşık bitkisel formlar hakkında yetersiz kalması ve gelişen teknolojilerin daha ayrıntılı verilertoplanmasına izin vermesi, araştırmacıları yeni alternatifler arama yoluna itmiştir. Bitki biyoteknolojisi ile ilgili gelişmeler, sonyirmi yılda mikroskobi, yapısal ve fonksiyonel bitki modellemeleri, fenotiplendirme ve genomik çalışmaları gibiteknolojilerdeki ilerlemelere bağlı olarak hızlı bir şekilde değişim göstermiştir. Özellikle “fenomik” adı verilen vefenotiplendirme ile bitkilerin incelendiği çalışmalar, araştırıcıların ilgisini çeken son yılların popüler konularından biridurumundadır. Günümüzde tarımsal alanda gerçekleştirilen bilimsel araştırmalar ve üretim teknikleri, dijital ve görsel olarakdaha yüksek kararlılıkta gerçekleştirilir hale gelmiştir. Robot ve sensör sistemlerindeki hızlı gelişmeler; tarımsal araştırmalarlabir araya gelerek tarımsal biyoteknolojide yeni ufuklar açmış, birçok araştırmacı için mükemmel bir model olan bitkimimarisinin ve hatta bitkisel dokuların da belirlenmesi sağlanmıştır. Üç boyutlu biyoteknoloji, tarımsal araştırmalardafenotiplendirme çalışmalarının yanı sıra, robotik sistemlerle algılama ve haritalandırma alanlarında da sıklıkla kullanılmaktadır.Ayrıca bitkilerin 3D yapılarını veren bilgisayar algoritmaları aracılığıyla mimari tasarımlar yapılabildiği gibi, çeşitli ürün vesanat eserleri de üretilmektedir.Bitkisel dokuların yapı ve fonksiyonlarının belirlenmesi ve bitki doku kültürü tekniklerinde yeni kültür sistemleriningeliştirilmesi için 3D baskılama teknolojisinden yararlanılması önemli bir yaklaşım haline gelmeye başlamıştır. Sonzamanlarda, hayvan doku mühendisliğindeki mikro benzerliklerden dolayı, bitki formlarının ve bitkilerden elde edilen çeşitliürünlerin doku iskelesi üretiminde kullanım potansiyelleri araştırılmaktadır. Çoğunlukla hayvan hücre kültürü tekniklerindekullanılan mikroakışkan sistemler, bitkisel hücrelerle ilişkili araştırmalarda da yoğun şekilde ele alınmaktadır. Bahsedilen tümbu teknikler ile elde edilen veriler, tarımda zararlılarla mücadeleden, tıpta yapay organların tasarlanmasına, bilgisayaroyunlarının programlanmasından ormancılığa kadar pek çok alanda kullanılmaktadır. Bu makalede, bitkisel sistemlerde 3Dteknolojisi ile gerçekleştirilen çalışmalar özetlenmeye çalışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜLER, B., METİNER, P. S., İZ, S. G. (2022). OVERVIEW OF 3D TECHNOLOGY APPLICATIONS IN PLANTS: PHENOMIC, MAPPING WITH ROBOTIC SYSTEMS, ARCHITECTURAL DESIGNS, PLANT AND ANIMAL TISSUE CULTURE APPROACHES. Anadolu Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi :C-Yaşam Bilimleri ve Biyoteknoloji, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 239–255. https://ajindex.com/articles/438572

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Brodersen CR, Rodd AB. New frontiers in the three-dimensional visualization of plant structure and function. American Journal of Botany 2015; 103 (2): 184-188.
  2. Chaudhury A, Ward C, Talasaz A. Ivanov AG, Brophy M, Grodzinski B, Hüner NPA, Patel RV and Barroni, J.L. 2017. Machine Vision System for 3D Plant Phenotyping. https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.00540
  3. Wen W, Guo X, Wang Y, Zhao C, Liao W. Constructing a three-dimensional resource database of plants using situ-measured morphological data. 2016 ASABE Annual International Meeting. Orlando, Florida July 17-20, 2016. Paper Number: 162449020. Pradal C, Boudon F, Nouguier C, Chopard J, Godin C. PlantGL: a Python-based geometric library for 3D plant modeling at different scales. Graphical Models 2009; 71: 1–21. Peele B N. CS5643 Final Project: Modeling leaf venation patterns for use in 3D printing. Mechanical Engineering, Cornell University 2012.
  4. Paulus S, Behmann J, Mahlein A K, Plümer L, Kuhlmann H. Low-Cost 3D Systems: Suitable Tools for Plant Phenotyping. Sensors 2014; 14: 3001-3018.
  5. Omasa K, Hosoi F, Konishi A. 3D lidar imaging for detecting and understanding plant responses and canopy structure. Journal of Experimental Botany 2007; 58(4): 881–898. Lin Y. LiDAR: An important tool for next-generation phenotyping technology of high potential for plant phenomics? Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 2015;119: 61–73.
  6. Bietresato M, Carabin G, Vidoni R, Gasparetta A, Mazzetto F. Evaluation of a LiDAR-based 3Dstereoscopic vision system for crop-monitoring applications. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 2016; 124: 1–13.
  7. Chaivivatrakul S, Tang L, Dailey M N, Namarmi AD. Automatic morphological trait characterization for corn plants via 3D holographic reconstruction. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 2014; 109: 109-123.
  8. Dhondt S, Wuyts N, Inzé D. Cell to whole-plant phenotyping: the best is yet to come. Trends in Plant Science 2013; 18 (8): 1360-1385.
  9. An N, Welch SM, Markelz RJC, Baker RL, Palmer CM, Ta J, Maloof JN, Weinig, C. Quantifying time-series of leaf morphology using 2D and 3D photogrammetry methods for high-throughput plant phenotyping. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 2017; 135: 222-232. Chéné Y, Rousseau D, Lucidarme P, Bertheloot J, Caffier V, Morel P, Belin É, Chapeau-Blondeau F. On the use of depth camera for 3D phenotyping of entire plants. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 2012; 82: 122–127.
  10. Sodhi P, Vijayarangan S, Wettergreen D. In-field Segmentation and Identification