SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anadolu Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi :A-Uygulamalı Bilimler ve Mühendislik / 2000 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1

Sulu çözeltilerden Cr(VI) gideriminde alüminanın rolü

Role of alumina in Cr (VI) removal from aqueous solutions

Yakup CUCİ
Halil HASAR
Pages
201–206
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Although the removal percentage of Cr(VI) on activated alumina under optimal conditions is high, in practice, it could not be used as a potential sorbent for removal of Cr(VI) because high dose of adsorbent.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper presents the adsorption characteristics for the removal of Cr (VI) from aqueous solutions using alumina obtained from Etibank Aluminum Plant.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In order to define the optimum conditions, the effects of contact time, activation process, pH of solution, initial concentration, adsorbent dose and salinity on the removal of Cr (VI) have been investigated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Although the removal percentage of Cr(VI) on activated alumina under optimal conditions is high, in practice, it could not be used as a potential sorbent for removal of Cr(VI) because high dose of adsorbent.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This paper presents the adsorption characteristics for the removal of Cr (VI) from aqueous solutions using alumina obtained from Etibank Aluminum Plant. In order to define the optimum conditions, the effects of contact time, activation process, pH of solution, initial concentration, adsorbent dose and salinity on the removal of Cr (VI) have been investigated. It is shown that the Freundlich Isotherm Model adequately described batch adsorption data. Although the removal percentage of Cr(VI) on activated alumina under optimal conditions is high, in practice, it could not be used as a potential sorbent for removal of Cr(VI) because high dose of adsorbent.

Özet

Bu makale, Etibank Alüminyum Fabrikasından temin edilen alumina ile sulu çözeltilerden Cr(VI) giderimi için adsorpsiyon karakteristiklerini sunmaktadır. Optimum şartları tayin etmek amacıyla, temas süresinin, aktivasyon prosesinin, çözelti pH'nın başlangıç konsantrasyonunun, adsorbent dozajının ve tuzluluğun Cr(VI) giderimindeki etkisi incelenmiştir. Freundlich İzoterm Modelinin adsorpsiyon verilerini oldukça iyi tanımladığı görülmüştür. Optimum şartlarda Cr(VI)'nın aktif alumina üzerindeki giderim yüzdesi yüksek olmasına rağmen, yüksek adsorbent dozajı gerektirdiğinden uygulamada Cr(VI) giderimi için potansiyel bir sorbent olarak kullanılamaz.

🔖

Cite This Article

CUCİ, Y., HASAR, H. (2022). Sulu çözeltilerden Cr(VI) gideriminde alüminanın rolü. Anadolu Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi :A-Uygulamalı Bilimler ve Mühendislik, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1, 201–206. https://ajindex.com/articles/438536

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Ajmal, M., Khan, A. H., Ahmad, S. and Ahmad, A. (1998). Role of Sawdust in the Removal of Copper (II) from Industrial Wastes. Water Research, 32,3085-3091
  2. Alaerts, G J., Jitjaturant, V. and Keldarman, P. (1989). Use of Coconut Shell Based Activated Carbon for Chromium (VI) Removal. Water Science and Technology, 21, 1701-1704.
  3. Beas, A. U., Okuda T., Nishijima, W., Shoto E. and Okada, M. (1997). Adsorption and Ion Exchange of Some Groundwater Anion Contaminants in an Amine Modified Coconut Coir. Water Science and Technology, 35, 89-95.
  4. Chakravarty, R., Prasad, G. and Raupainwar, D.C. (1998). Static Removal of Copper (II) from Aqueous Solutions by Hematite. Environmental Technology, 19,315-322.
  5. Chand, S., Agarwal, V.K. and Pavankumar, C. (1994). Removal of Hexavalent Chromium from Wastewater by Adsorption. Indian Journal of Environmental Health, 36, 151-158.
  6. Cici, M. and Keles, E. (1990). Removal of Chromium (VI) Ions from Solutions with Active Carbon Prepared from Rice Hulls. Pakistan Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, 33, 347-350.
  7. Kapoor, A. and Viraraghavan,T. (1998). Use of Immobilized Bentonite in Removal of Heavy Metals from Wastewater. Journal of Environmental Engineering ASCE, 124,1020-1024.
  8. Lee, C.K. and Low, K.S. (1989). Removal of Copper from Solution Using Moss. Environmental Technology, 10, 395-404.
  9. Low, K.S., Lee, C.K, and Wong, S.L. (1995). Effect of. Dye Modification on the Sorption of Copper by Coconut Husk. Environmental Technology, 16, 877-883.
  10. Mckay, G.,Blair, H.S. and Garden, J.R. (1982). Adsorption of Dyes on Chitin I. Equilibrium Studies. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 27, 3043-3057.
  11. Morris, J.C. and Weber, WJ. (1963). Kinetics of Adsorption on Carbon from Solution. Journal Sanitation Engineering Division PASCE 89(SA2), 31. Munah, E., Zein, R.( 1997). The use Rice Husk for Removal of Toxic Metals from Wastewater. Environmental Technology, 18, 359-362.
  12. Özer, A., Tümen, F., and Bildik, M. (1997). Cr(VI) Removal from Aqueous Solutions by Depectinated Sugar Beet Pulp. Chimica Acta Turcica, 25, 113-118.
  13. Periasamy, K., Srinivasan, K, and Murugan, PR.(1991). Studies on Chromium (VI) Removal by Activated Groundnut Husk Carbon. Indian Journal of Environmental Health, 33,433-439.
  14. Raji, C., and Anirudhan, T.S. (1998). Batch Cr(VI) Removal by Polyacrylamide-Grafted Sawdust: Kinetics and Thermodynamics. Water Research, 32(12), 3772-3780.
  15. Ramos, R.L., Martinez, AJ. and Coronado, R.M.G. (1994). Adsorption of Chromium(VI) from aqueous